Why are councillors in London running for office in Bangladesh?

Tower Hamlets

The east-London borough of Tower Hamlets has long been a byword for the failure of multiculturalism in the UK, with the area’s large Bangladeshi Muslim population increasingly voting along ethno-religious lines.

Reports on Friday that members of the local council are seeking election in Bangladesh are therefore, to put it mildly, not a good look. According to the Standard, three Tower Hamlets councillors have won the endorsement of the Bangladeshi National Party to fight the 2026 elections, slated for February. The Westminster government has described it as ‘unacceptable’, but so far the councillors are unrepentant. A spokesperson for Tower Hamlets council has insisted that the councillors have broken no law, in England or Bangladesh.


Meanwhile in Minnesota

Share

The treatment of British Jews proves the lie at the heart of multiculturalism

London

If you want proof that multiculturalism is a lie, look no further than the plight of British Jews. Targeted on our streets; threatened and spat upon as they go to and from synagogue; their children’s schools hidden behind prison-like security; seldom able to open their communal newspapers without seeing a report of a fanatic calling for the slaughter of fellow Jews in Israel.

This is Jewish life in the UK today. Only part of it, of course, for there are also the sweet hopes of Rosh Hashanah, the sukkah-building and celebrations of Sukkot, and the lights and latkes of Chanukah. But whatever their level of involvement in communal life, few British Jews live their lives unaware of the grim mood music.

Share

Michael Murphy: British multiculturalism has failed

LONDON — Now we know what globalizing the intifada looks like. In Manchester last week, a rabbi addressed his congregation in a robe stained with blood. Hours earlier, on Yom Kippur, Judaism’s holiest day, a jihadi terrorist rammed a car into worshippers at the gates of a synagogue before going on a stabbing spree. By the time officers shot the attacker, two were dead and four more injured, some from accidental police fire.

Share

For centuries Britain was a bastion against anti-Semitism. Now we have imported it.

It’s the fact that it happened in Britain that is so disturbing. We can no longer tell ourselves that this is a safe country, a country that elevates civic order and religious tolerance, a country that leaves anti-Semitism, along with other forms of extremism, to excitable foreigners.

Until this week, British Jews had been spared the horrors visited on their co-religionists in even our nearest neighbours. France has seen stabbings at a Marseilles synagogue, children shot in a Jewish school in Toulouse, a hostage siege in a kosher supermarket in the Île-de-France, a knife attack on a Jewish community centre in Nice and hundreds of incidents of desecration, intimidation and abuse.


Like Great Britain Canada imported Islam.

Who thought inviting a cult that hates us was good idea?

Share

Canadians are fed up with woke identity politics

In the April 2025 federal election, the New Democratic Party was nearly wiped from the Canadian electoral map. The NDP was reduced to seven parliamentary seats, five short of the 12 needed to gain official party status. NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, one of the worst politicians in recent memory, lost his own seat. The once-proud standard-bearer of Canadian Leftism was reduced to a mere 6 percent of the popular vote.

Share

The Crumbling of Cologne’s Multicultural Consensus

Last week, news of a round-table agreement banning criticism of immigration in Cologne made headlines—not least because it caught the attention of Elon Musk. Seven parties, from the center-right Christian Democrats (CDU) to the SPD, Greens, and Left Party, had signed the so-called Fairness Agreement, pledging not to criticize asylum seekers or migrants during election campaigns. The agreement has existed since 2017, but now, ahead of the municipal elections on September 14th, it has finally cracked.

Share

Racist Canada should just let everyone in to please the Star

Canada’s immigration approach is becoming more exclusionary. It’s not the direction we should be heading

In 2023, Canada marked the 100th anniversary of the Chinese Exclusion Act, a law that explicitly banned nearly all Chinese immigrants for nearly a quarter century. Many see it as a black mark in Canadian history because it deliberately targeted and expelled the very Chinese labourers who had done the dangerous, back-breaking work of building the Canadian Pacific Railway, only to be cast aside once their labour was no longer needed.

The centenary was a moment of reflection. But since then, Canada has become more restrictive, not less. Rising immigration refusal rates, while not racially explicit, are carrying the pattern of exclusion forward.


About the “author” Yvonne Su is an associate professor in the Department of Equity Studies at York University and a visiting scientist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Share

Defending Savagery in the Name of Multiculturalism

What’s not to like about multiculturalism? After all, isn’t diversity our strength? Don’t cultural influences from around the world add spice and flavor to the bland, Eurocentric West, which some people even say has no culture of its own? Take food, for example; as everyone always points out when this topic comes up, different cultures bring a smorgasbord of vibrant cuisines to the West! Also rape gangs, no-go zones, and machete attacks, but that’s a small price to pay for a corner kebab stand.

Share

Harehills, Leicester and the other riots we don’t talk about

This week marks the first anniversary of the ferocious stabbing spree at a dance class in the Merseyside town of Southport, in which three little girls were murdered by teenager Axel Rudakubana. In the days that followed, riots rocked Southport and other towns across England, fuelled by false claims that the perpetrator was an illegal Muslim migrant. More than 1,500 arrests were made and hundreds were imprisoned.

Share

We are coming apart: How asylum, multiculturalism and contempt for the masses turned Britain into a tinder box.

It’s been almost a year since the Southport massacre. That sunny morning, etched forever in infamy, when Axel Rudakubana committed his barbaric, depraved murders of three young girls at a dance class in the Merseyside seaside town. It sparked the worst anti-migrant riots Britain has seen in modern times, fuelled by false claims Rudakubana was a Muslim, small-boats asylum seeker. But to anyone who had been paying attention, the seeds of that horrific unrest were sown long before that.

Sounds familiar.

Share

What if British culture is part of the problem?

Islamism has thrived thanks to the cowardice and evasiveness of the UK’s liberal elites.

The claim that ‘no culture is better than another’ often tips over into an asymmetrical elevation of ‘the other’ and an abasement of the self. In Britain, advocates of hard multiculturalism tend to celebrate cultures belonging to migrants and their descendants, and to denigrate the culture of the historic, indigenous majority.

Share

Britain’s blasphemy laws were made by multiculturalism

Many had warned that Britain would soon have ‘blasphemy laws by the back door’. And so it came to pass on Monday, when Hamit Coskun was found guilty of a religiously aggravated public-order offence for setting fire to the Koran. Yet while there has been justified outrage at the decision, there remains a failure to grasp the true meaning of this landmark verdict. It represents not merely the return of blasphemy law by the back door, but also the advancement of ‘hard multiculturalism’ through the front door.

Share

Japan-China War being Refought In Canada

China anti-Japanese propaganda poster

Anti-Japanese Museum in Canada Draws Criticism from Lawmakers

On May 27, 2025, Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker Masahisa Sato raised concerns in the House of Councillors Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee over a museum in Canada run by a Chinese-Canadian organization. It was not the first time he had done so. The museum, he said, conspicuously promotes anti-Japanese narratives through exhibits shown to large numbers of local high school students. He first raised the issue at an April 17 committee session.

According to those familiar with the matter, the museum in question opened in June 2024 in Toronto, Ontario. Called the Asia Pacific Peace Museum, it was reportedly spearheaded by a local Chinese-Canadian organization called Alpha Education. Its exhibits include references prominently reflecting China’s viewpoint on the Nanjing Incident and comfort women.


Fact: Japan was a brutal aggressor that committed war crimes on a massive scale in China.

Their treatment of allied prisoners of war while inhuman pales in comparison to the Rape of Nanking and other grotesqueries. 

China went communist and the west needed allies post WW II so Japan’s atrocities were largely swept under the rug. 

But why does Toronto have to have a Museum dedicated to this war?

Has it become fashionable that all ethnic groups rekindle their historic blood-feuds here in the Magic Kingdom of Multiculturalism and Diversity?

Or is this just more ChiCom feckery?

Share

Why I changed my mind about multiculturalism

When Blackburn MP Adnan Hussain complains about an opponent believing ‘free speech means protecting the right to offend Muslims’, you feel an instinctive response gathering in your throat. You’re damn right it does. It means the right to burn the Qur’an, mock the Hadith and doodle cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed performing in a rainbow-flag hijab on RuPaul’s Drag Race. In a liberal society, people should be free to blaspheme against any and all religions, even pretendy ones like Anglicanism.

Share