Since mid-April, Joseph Kidd of the Northern Alberta city of Grande Prairie, has been arrested on sexual assault charges three times and released shortly after each arrest, only to allegedly reoffend within a matter of days.
Anyone wondering whether the justice system is failing Canadians need look no further than the Kidd case. Should the charges against him stand up in court, you’d have to wonder why he was put back on the streets to reoffend after the first time, much less the third.
As Britain reacted to an eruption of anti-migrant violence in Belfast earlier this month, seeing images of burnt-out terraced housing and hearing accounts of African nurses apprehended at checkpoints, a parallel story was unfolding 6,000 miles away, albeit on a much larger scale. In the Sherwood suburb of Durban, South Africa, some five-dozen immigrants from Malawi were taking refuge in a field beside a mosque, having been chased from their homes by protesters demanding they leave the country.
It seems incredible that what could be described as a ‘he said / she said’ between US president Donald Trump and Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni has become an international incident. In the aftermath of Trump claiming Meloni ‘begged’ him for a photo at last week’s G7 summit in France (a claim categorically denied by the Italian PM), Italian foreign minister Antonio Tajani cancelled his scheduled meeting with US counterpart Marco Rubio next month. The rhetoric between the two countries has only escalated since, with Trump accusing Italy of being an ungrateful ally.
Each of the major Anglo states is struggling with shame for their past, and, to cope, has turned to a new philosophy of anti-West, anti-white, decolonial, self-obliterating multiculturalism that elevates foreign above familiar. But it’s Canada, of all places, that seared this way of thinking into its Constitution and social matrix without democratic debate.
The policewoman left bloodied and sobbing from a broken nose after an attempted arrest at Manchester Airport turned violent has today branded her attacker a ‘coward’.
As university dropout Mohammed Fahir Amaaz was jailed for three-and-a-half years, Lydia Ward accused him of showing ‘not one ounce’ of remorse for using her ‘as a punch bag’.
Delivering her powerful statement directly to the 21-year-old, the officer – now promoted to sergeant – told him: ‘You changed my face.’
Public unrest is usually treated as a problem the government must solve. Disorder appears, the public grows anxious, politicians step forward, and the state promises to restore calm. On the surface, it sounds reasonable. Isn’t that what government is supposed to do?
But what if unrest is not merely a problem for the government, but an opportunity? What if fear, anger, and division become the raw material from which governments manufacture more power?
A nightmare scenario has been playing on eastern European minds with increasing intensity since Donald Trump returned to the White House: what if Russia attacks and the US does not join the fight?
On the rare occasions the question is posed out loud, nobody much likes the answer. In mid-May, at a gathering in Tallinn, the US undersecretary of state Thomas DiNanno was asked directly whether American troops would fight if Russia invaded the Baltic states. He shifted uncomfortably in his chair, then gave a meandering answer. It did not include the word “yes”.
The Canadian government’s recent cut to mental health services for migrants has some progressive professionals criticizing the decision. They argue that the remaining funded hours per year are not enough for migrants to “heal from their trauma.” There are two questions that should be asked. The first is why professionals such as psychologists and social workers are concerned about who receives funding for their services. The second is why the Canadian government is funding the services at all.
A decade ago, it was all “Russians! Under my bed!” everywhere. Those Russians were fictional, for the most part, part of a campaign organized by Clintonistas to explain away her humiliating defeat, and magnified by various Deep State operatives into an effort to discredit and weaken the first Trump term. (The previous sentence counted as conspiracy theory then; now it’s unexceptionable truth, like so many of those conspiracy theories.)
But while the Russians weren’t actually calling the shots, the the Latté Communist Party, more officially known as the Democratic Socialists of America, has been seeking out election victories everywhere. And winning some.
After years of criminal justice reform that included a lighter touch for some offenders, the federal Liberal government has done an about-face and enacted stricter policies to tamp down on crime rates that have become a political liability in some vote-rich parts of the country.
While much of the public’s attention has been focused on the U.S. trade dispute and persistent affordability concerns, the Liberal government’s legislative agenda in the most recent parliamentary sitting was heavily weighted toward a crime crackdown.
Justice Minister Sean Fraser restored some mandatory minimum sentences, mostly targeting firearms and child sex crimes, and tightened bail laws designed to keep more repeat, violent offenders locked up for longer.
Law and order? As in a surveillance state with two tiered justice.
This is a commercial for soy milk and low testosterone. pic.twitter.com/qUT9LlNblt
— Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) June 25, 2026
On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced in a meeting with NATO allies in Brussels that the Pentagon would begin a six-month review of U.S. military involvement in Europe. This review, he asserted, “will be designed to ensure that NATO is moving fast and irreversibly toward Europe leading, stepping up to take primary responsibility for the defence of Europe.”
"If you don’t believe in climate change, you’re a fckıng idiot… In the last 24 hours, we have now had 32 worldwide earthquakes."
pic.twitter.com/BfgD5ZayLu— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) June 26, 2026
OTTAWA — For a fifth consecutive record-breaking year, the number of new immigration cases pouring into Canada’s Federal Court has surged and may exceed 30,000 files in 2026 — nearly five times the volume handled before the pandemic. Among the steepest increases is one that exposes the systemic crisis and illuminates a legal backlash against border enforcement efforts.
Urgent motions to halt deportations have jumped 54 percent in a single year, the court says.
Carney is flooding the zone with crisis after crisis.
Healthcare, food insecurity, the housing shortage, absence of official accountability, policing, foreign influence, Islamist entryism, the unwillingness to protect our borders, with almost all having their root cause linked in whole or in part to the LPC’s criminally exploitive mass immigration scam.
Immigration is supposed to benefit the host nation, in Canada it is used as a weapon by Carney and his profiteers to keep us under heel.
Before leaving London this morning, I finished watching one of the most terrifying films I’ve ever seen: Uwe Boll’s ‘Citizen Vigilante’. It is not a good movie, technically speaking: it’s propagandistic, and full of holes (e.g., there are a hundred ways the Vigilante makes it easy for cops to identify him and track him down, but they never seem to do it). Narratively, it is a total mess. But technical excellence is not its point. It’s not even a good movie in the moral sense, more on which later. Not gonna lie, I felt dirty watching it.
But I’m glad I did, because it is an extremely powerful movie, for one reason: it tells forbidden but widely known truths about life in lawless Europe overrun by migrants, and it speaks deeply — deeply — to the sense of suppressed outrage that many ordinary Europeans feel towards the film’s twin villains: migrant criminals and the European establishment (law enforcement, courts, politicians) that allow them to tyrannize innocent Europeans. The academic David Betz warns of civil war coming to Europe if those in power don’t do something serious about migration and the problems it causes. This movie shows you exactly what he means.
Why is it always “fascist” when we defend ourselves?
