
College professors insist all private activity in space must be regulated, by them
“This has been for too long dominated by old white men,”
h/t Lord Dilligaf

College professors insist all private activity in space must be regulated, by them
“This has been for too long dominated by old white men,”
h/t Lord Dilligaf

If you’ve heard that the diversity, equity and inclusion agenda is going away, don’t believe it. An emerging practice at elite medical schools segregates students by race to teach them about alleged structural racism in healthcare.
The University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine requires that first year students take a class called “Structural Racism and Health Equity” as part of the standard curriculum. In one exercise for the course, students divide by racial group and retreat to different areas to discuss antiracist prompts.
This is known as racial caucusing, a teaching device that UCLA describes as an “anti-racist pedagogical tool” to “provide a reflective space for us to explore how our positionality—particularly our racial identities as perceived within clinical spaces—influence our interaction with patients, colleagues and other staff.”

In recent months, we have witnessed a critical mass of antisemitic Canadians willing to vandalize Jewish businesses, protest relentlessly for a Palestinian nation-state “from the river to the sea” and even threaten police officers with death.
It’s not entirely clear how much of the blame for this despicable behaviour can be placed on the fundamentally racist ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion that has been allowed to fester in universities for years, and how much is a result of the erosion of shared values among Canadians.
Give this a read, it nails what we have discussed on this blog for years. I am frankly surprised a mainstream media source printed it.

Amanda Blanc, the chief executive of insurance company Aviva, has revealed that no white males can be recruited to senior posts without her say-so. Speaking last week at a Treasury Select Committee hearing on sexism in the finance industry, Blanc said that there can be ‘no non-diverse hire at Aviva without it being signed off by me and the chief people officer’.

While it may once have been scandalous for employers to exclude white men from their recruitment process, fast forward to 2023 and most hiring panels appear to have decided it’s riskier to include them. Infuriated by the failure of equality to produce equal outcomes, our liberal culture demands a bogeyman, and in the straight, white male, it found the pantomime villain of its dreams. Whatever your grievance, the patriarchy will shoulder the blame because any alternative culprit is simply too ‘offensive’ to countenance—no matter how well the facts support their claim.
Its CEO has admitted no white male hire is made without her approval. Many would call it discrimination

So there we have it. Laid bare for all to see, the pernicious effect of our national fixation with “diversity, equality and inclusion” (DEI). Aviva’s chief executive Amanda Blanc this week told MPs on the Treasury Select Committee that there is no senior “non-diverse” (white male) hire made at the company without her personal approval. There is no need, she implicitly admitted, to sign off on the appointments of non-white people and women. Most people would call that clear evidence of discrimination.
The good news is that Brit courts in recent years have found for white males who have encountered blatant discrimination such as this.
A former Facebook diversity program manager pleaded guilty to scamming the social media giant out of more than $4 million through a scheme in which she faked business deals in exchange for kickbacks, the Justice Department said.
Barbara Furlow-Smiles, who served as lead strategist and global head of employee resource groups and diversity engagement at Facebook, used the stolen funds to live an extravagant lifestyle that spanned from California to Georgia, prosecutors said.

Social justice is a signature mission of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has promoted it with incessant virtue signalling. Yet it is unraveling due to an amoral, self-contradictory ideology and incompetent execution. As a result, Canada is a more divided country, riven by interpersonal and communal tensions and afflicted by the worst outbreak of antisemitism in our history.
This is multiculturalism, this is diversity, this is mass immigration you bigots! Now if you’ll excuse me I have a DEI session to attend where I’ll learn all about my white privilege and have my heritage denigrated. https://t.co/K2vVzJRg3q
— Fancypants Maloney (@fancypants_s) December 5, 2023

How far will the world let anti-Semitism spiral out of control?
Protesters storming school board meetings, pushing blood libels on Jews, and even a seeing menorah lighting cancelled – these are dark times.
A corner was turned in Canada on Oct 7.
Islamoleftism revealed itself to be far more malignant and far more widespread than most believed possible.
The most surprsed are the absurdly numerous Kumbaya Kool-Aid drinkers who believed Islamists were instantaneously made non-death culty on contact with our magic Canadian soil.
A reckoning is afoot and I speculate Oct 7 will result in the birth of a tribalized right.
On an individual level I doubt many who hold anti-semitic, sorry anti-Zionist beliefs will have a change of heart and the idiots who insist you can appease the crocodile will always be with us so long as the croc needs them.
What should worry Canadians is the looming shadow of institutionalized anti-white racism and the politicization of our justice system.
One of Britain’s wealthiest charities is changing its entire Board of Trustees as part of an anti-racism diversity drive after branding itself ‘white and privileged’.
The Tudor Trust is undergoing a woke makeover that has meant stopping all grants for 20 months while it ‘re-thinks’ its future and staff learn about ‘racial justice’ and ‘white supremacy culture’.
The organisation, which has assets of around £288million and gives about £20 million a year to good causes, was founded in 1955 by a bequest from Sir Godfrey Mitchell, founder of building giant George Wimpey, and several of his descendants are trustees.
h/t Mauser

The wheels are falling off Canada’s diversity bus
Ethnocultural diversity is a prominent concern for businesses, educational institutions and governments nationwide. Canada chose the path to be a multicultural nation in 1971 when prime minister Pierre Trudeau introduced policies that promoted the inclusion of diverse perspectives and contributions while honouring Canadians’ unique differences. This commitment to diversity was enshrined within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, and in 1987 Canada took a groundbreaking step by passing the Multicultural Act.
Fast forward to 2023, and the message from the federal government remains consistent, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently affirmed, “We’re a place that does diversity better than just about anywhere else.”
… Perhaps as a society, we haven’t fully embraced this vision. In our survey, we shared a list of nine values and asked Canadians to tell us how strongly they associated each one as a core value of being Canadian. Four values — democracy, freedom of speech, Canada’s social safety net, and equality of genders — were strongly associated with by a small majority of respondents. Is it concerning that multiculturalism and tolerance for different religious faiths took the bottom two spots on the list?
Canadians are rebelling at being force fed the slow poisons of multiculturalism and diversity but for some reason the article fails to mention the negative impact mass immigration is having on Canadian society.
This piece is written by the Leger people so perhaps that explains it, gotta keep those government contracts comin so don’t mention immigration.

Ask yourself: Would a young white male of the type that at one time comprised the bulk of the armed forces recruitment pool but is now a rara avis really be interested in defending Hamas supporters?
Immigration built Canada: does it now risk tearing our country apart? That is the troubling takeaway from a Leger report published this weekend in the National Post. The research firm asked 1,500 Canadians their opinions about protests in Canada related to the Hamas-Israel War, as well as the recent spike in hate crimes. Their answers reveal great concern about these issues and the way ethnocultural diversity has shaped our response, as well as that of our politicians.
Multiculturalism and diversity are code for anti-white racism.
On Oct. 21, I posted a message on my X feed that went viral. It has garnered nearly 11 million views over the past month. I reproduce it here


Despite the frequent Trudeau government declaration that “diversity is our strength,” a new poll finds that Canadians — both white and non-white — are skeptical of the maxim, and believe that diversity can bring “problems” as well as benefits.

But we all knew Multiculturalism was about identity politics and pandering to ethnic strongmen who could deliver votes.
Why isn’t similar content to be found in English media?
[Ouch]
“They appoint (unelected) representatives of ethnic, religious, sexual “communities” (which only have a real existence in the discourse of their self-proclaimed representativeness) in the hope that the members of said “communities” » give their votes in return to the… pic.twitter.com/ahna9SWIUj— Norman Spector (@nspector4) November 23, 2023
Beyond the Bochra Manaï affair – NB – Google translate
When Bochra Manaï was appointed commissioner for the fight against racism and systemic discrimination at the City of Montreal, Valérie Plante assured Montrealers that she had been selected following “a very rigorous process” which was “guarantee of quality of the person who had been chosen” and that the latter knew that she was now serving an “institution” and understood well “her [new] role”.
Many Montrealers were indeed worried about the fact that the main person concerned had made herself known above all as a spokesperson for the National Council of Canadian Muslims and that as such, she had publicly criticized Bill 21 on the secularism of the State and Quebec as a whole, which has become, according to her, “a reference for supremacists and extremists around the world”. Could we really think that someone who had made such provocative and unobjective remarks a few weeks earlier (she had gone so far as to associate Bill 21 with the attacks in Quebec and Christchurch, New Zealand) was going to change instantly, by the magic of an appointment, as an impartial commissioner?
The crux of the problem is there. We recruit political activists to make them civil servants who are supposed to be objective and impartial and we are then surprised that they have remained above all… activists.