“Anti-White Racism”

White working-class students are excluded from almost all Oxbridge diversity scholarships, an analysis by The Telegraph has found.

More than a dozen scholarships, bursaries and financial aid schemes are available to Oxford and Cambridge university students based on their ethnicity and not their socioeconomic backgrounds.

While all of the schemes can be used by students from black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds, they almost entirely exclude white working-class students, who are one of the most under-represented groups in higher education.

White flight from urban areas was a widespread phenomenon throughout the ‘60s and ‘70s, and into the ‘80s, but not all whites retreated to the suburbs. The fate of those left behind, mostly elderly whites, does not get reported. If the progressive press does mention them, it treats them with the same contempt that it reserves for the Afrikaners in South Africa. It dismisses them as racist relics that deserve whatever fate befalls them. But what was their fate? History books are mute on the subject. The reality was harsh for those elderly whites trapped in their homes as the neighborhood changed around them. They did not envision spending their golden years struggling to survive in a hostile environment.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said that anti-white racism instituted by the government in Westminster has spread throughout all of British society, and so the “madness” of the Equality Act must be rooted out.

In his debut article for Substack, Brexit champ Nigel Farage accused the Westminster establishment of actively working against the native people of Britain, arguing that the government actively promotes policies which advantage minorities and hurt white British people, creating a “two-tier” system in the country.

The cases of George Floyd and Henry Nowak occurred in different countries, under different circumstances, and generated vastly different levels of media attention.

An examination of Canadian media coverage suggests that Floyd’s death received significantly more attention from major news outlets than the case involving Nowak.

A group of white supremacists gathered on Saturday in Shawinigan in the Mauricie region to rally in support of a “White Quebec.”

The demonstration took place at Veterans’ Park near the Shawinigan City cenotaph.

A group of masked individuals held up a banner adorned with two fleurs-de-lis and bearing the words “I remember a White Quebec.”

I don’t see how anyone could be “shocked” about this given the criminal abuse of immigration that has seen Canada flooded with incompatible cultures. That’s what should be called out.

So this is where wokeness has dragged us. Into a moral abyss where a boy is handcuffed by cops as he bleeds to death. Into a wasteland of virtue where an 18-year-old lad, stabbed five times, is treated as a speechcriminal as he gasps his final breaths. Into a sorry, dystopic excuse for a society where the last words a youngster hears are the defamatory cries of the man who killed him. ‘He was racist’, his murderer said. ‘I can’t breathe’, the boy begged.

n December 3rd last year, 18-year-old Henry Nowak, a first-year student at the University of Southampton, was stabbed four times by his alleged attacker, Vickrum Digwa. As a Sikh, Digwa was permitted to carry a ceremonial kirpan knife. Perhaps this wasn’t butch enough, however, so he decided to complete his arsenal with an 8-inch blade or shastar (a Punjabi word for ‘weapon’ or ‘knife’), just to be on the safe side. The trial at Southampton Crown Court has heard how Digwa “aggressively pursued” his victim, inflicted the fatal wounds, and stood over him as he bled. In Snapchat footage recorded moments before the attack, Nowak taunted Digwa to say he was a bad man. Digwa replied: “I am a bad man.” He did not call for help.

Here’s the problem for Nowak: he was white; his assailant was not. Which means Digwa was perfectly within his rights to play the race card and did so to maximum effect.

A “whites-only” community in Arkansas now faces a federal discrimination lawsuit after a woman with Jewish ancestry and a black husband was denied the ability to buy land there.In 2025, a “private membership association,” Return to the Land, acquired 160 acres to set up a settlement in the Ozark Mountains. The group says that its community is limited to people with “traditional views and European ancestry.”

Hey Grok! – Are there “Black Only” or “Muslim Only” or “Jewish Only” Communities in the USA?

Yes, there are communities in the USA that are predominantly or historically “Black only” in practice, and some that function as de facto ethnic or religious enclaves for Muslims and Jews, though explicit legal exclusion by race or religion is generally illegal under federal law.

So they should have allowed it as it is illegal under law to discriminate, however a little patience would have proved this a stunt by irritating people and the conflict would have taken care of itself.

Children are being taught that black people cannot be racist towards white people as part of an education initiative aimed at countering racism.

Teenage pupils are told that black people can be racially prejudiced towards white people but that this is not racism because that can be exhibited only by those who hold cultural power, such as white people over black people.

Children as young as seven are also being taught that white people are likely to be privileged because of the colour of their skin.

The North Carolina NAACP backed a chapter president who declared it would be ‘seriously disturbing’ for a white person to take the spot of the outgoing black mayor.

Last week, Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles revealed she would step down from her position only halfway through her term, announcing June 30 as her final day in office and stating it ‘has been the honor of my life.’

Her announcement, however, sparked questions about why she was suddenly resigning, with many pointing to backlash over her handling of the stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a tram in the city.

The New York Times (NYT) has been sued for alleged discrimination against a white male employee after he was passed over for an editor’s job that went to a multiracial woman.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) accused the newspaper of breaching civil rights law by discriminating against the unnamed male candidate based on his race or sex, according to the complaint filed in Manhattan federal court.

The unnamed complainant, who has worked at the newspaper since 2014 and says he has “considerable experience with real estate news”, was interviewed for the deputy property editor role, but not advanced to the final round.

h/t kiki9