“Islamophobia”

This election showed how urgent it is that we fight back to preserve our civic and democratic values

The intimidation started on the streets. On October 7, as Jewish families were being butchered by Hamas terrorists, Islamists celebrated in London. They danced with joy and flew Palestinian flags from car windows. A large group cheered and set off fireworks. No Jew could feel entirely safe anywhere near these celebrations of a racist massacre.

Muslims openly call today for a pan-Islamic embrace of shari’a and the return to the dhimma and the jizya. This plan excludes Blacks, LGBT, Christians and of course, Jews.

Boy, have we done a great job educating the last few generations. DEI, CRT, woke progressivism.

Now we have Queers for Palestine. It takes a certain kinda stupidity to be Queer for Palestine.

Jess Phillips reveals the moral cowardice of the elites

A rabbi rounded on by a mob and denounced as a ‘snake’. An election candidate hounded off the streets by people calling him a ‘Zionist devil’. Young female leafleteers harassed by older men bellowing ‘genocide’ in their faces. Voters told they will face the wrath of God if they make the wrong decision in the polling station. Tyres slashed, campaign offices daubed with the deathly slur, ‘Zionist child killer’, in blood-red paint. Where did these sectarian obscenities occur? Iran, perhaps? Turkey? Actually, it was right here, in Britain, in 2024, during the General Election.

When the circus finally arrived, it offered the usual attractions. The old rituals were a comfort. John Curtice, the swing-o-meter, Laura Kuenssberg and Jeremy Vine performed the familiar motions, not to mention the irrepressible Count Binface.

But while the Labour celebrations and the Tory misery felt routine – even after we had grown used to them in opposite roles – under cover of darkness, a shocking new act crept into the tent.

An insurgent force has entered British politics. The Muslim Vote had no rosette and advanced no meaningful manifesto beyond a set of deeply sectarian principles. It stood candidates tactically, and owed their allegiances purely to religious and ethnic interests.