Gun Rights

One of the most ridiculous refrains I hear from gun control advocates is how we supposedly know that gun control works.

Every study they cite has massive problems, but they still cite them. However, three men in California were arrested for basically making gun control look bad.

There is nothing in the Constitution that allows the executive branch to unilaterally redefine a longstanding provision within federal law.

One must wonder if, at this late stage in Joe Biden’s imperial presidency, the assorted courts of the United States have asked their I.T. mavens to install a keyboard shortcut on their computers that, if pressed in anger, outputs a reminder that Article I vests all legislative power in Congress rather than in the presidency. In theory, such a tactic could save a great deal of time. In the controversy would come, and, as might a worker on a production line, the judge could simply press Ctrl + Fn + 1 to issue forth yet another admonition that, however passionate he might be about a given topic, the American president is still not a king.

Joe ain’t there. They must have an automated rubber stamp issuing his decrees.

Four years ago, the federal government prohibited “1,500 types” of “assault-style” firearms. Has public safety improved as promised?

Fact-checking is an odd industry. We’ve seen plenty of examples of “fact-checks” that seemingly dispute the actual facts, ignoring the plethora of evidence supporting an initial claim, all because the fact-checker really wanted the claim to be false.

The Trudeau government is losing a key ally in its efforts to take hundreds of thousands of military-style firearms out of circulation, jeopardizing one of the top items in its public security agenda.

Launched in 2020, the federal government’s plan to buy back and destroy firearms it has banned — such as AR-15s — has long been vilified by firearms industry groups and the Conservative Party of Canada.