“China eats weird animals disease”

Last month the Justice Department filed criminal charges against Dr. David Morens of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for using his private email to conceal official activities from the public.

According to federal prosecutors, Dr. Morens tried to keep taxpayer dollars flowing to the EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak. He was the middleman in NIAID’s dealings with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which also, prosecutors charge, handed out gifts to Dr. Morens.

Time is running out to prosecute Dr. Anthony Fauci. After May 11, Fauci — the man touted as “America’s doctor” during the pandemic and who led the US response — will be clear of the five-year statute of limitations. Past that date, he can’t be indicted over allegations that he lied to Congress about the origins of Covid or the US government’s role in funding research that may have led to the pandemic.

Six years after a contagion that killed millions and wrecked the global economy, one of the great unanswered questions of Covid is, how did it begin? Today, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject what in 2020 was more or less the official (but outlandish) story: namely, that the novel coronavirus sprang from a wet market in Wuhan, China, and somehow jumped from bats — or pangolins? — to humans.

The Covid Inquiry’s Module 4 report, published this week, claims that 475,000 lives were saved by vaccination in England and Scotland. A further 7,000 are attributed to Wales. These figures are presented as findings. They are not findings. They are the outputs of a WHO model.

The inquiry itself has already identified this as a problem in a different context.

In its Module 2 report, Baroness Hallett found that scenarios were wrongly treated as forecasts, that ministers failed to grasp the distinction and that the reasonable worst-case scenario was what Professor Whitty called a “slippery concept”. The inquiry recommended multiple scenario planning precisely to guard against treating a single modelled worst case as a prediction.

I’m wondering if at this point, we can all agree that the Covid shot was a bioweapon? Check out this data, originally from VAERS, compiled and organized by a website known as openvaers.com…

Five years after their wide deployment, first on a voluntary basis, then under threat of firing for nearly 100 million Americans at the direction of the White House, COVID-19 vaccines for at least low-risk groups may be on the way out amid higher regulatory requirements and indifference to the jabs by the vast majority of Americans.