“Environmentalists”

David Suzuki showed off his hypocrisy once again at a speech in Toronto, where he called for urgent climate action at the Draw the Line protest and criticized wealth accumulation, despite owning multiple high-value properties.

‘Magical fairy dust’: A city report shows strong support for burning Toronto’s trash. Climate advocates are calling for the study to be scrapped

As Toronto’s landfill approaches capacity, there’s “strong support” from residents to consider incinerating the city’s trash, according to a new report that’s already drawing the ire of climate advocates.

A city report released Friday provided the results of public consultations held earlier this year on long-term plans for Toronto’s trash. The city-owned Green Lane Landfill southwest of London, Ont. is the current destination for almost all of Toronto’s garbage, but is expected to reach capacity by 2035.

The city has been exploring options that include either building a new landfill or using an existing one, as well as switching to so-called “energy-from-waste” technology, better known as incineration.

You might have gotten the impression that the Great Barrier Reef—the aquatic wonder off Australia’s coast—is in grave peril. Last month, headlines shouted in unison: Great Barrier Reef suffers worst coral decline on record. Environmental journalists paint a picture of immense devastation driven by climate change.

The truth is much less alarming. Australian scientists have meticulously tracked the reef’s coral cover since 1986. For many years, they published an annual average coral cover figure. The data show that the reef was mostly stable until 2000, then began declining, and by 2012 it had shrunk to less than half its original cover.

NOAA, the “experts,” predicted an “above-normal” hurricane season this year. Of course they predict that every year, and the public has been told for decades that humans and our use of natural resources is the cause of increased activity.

After Hurricane Katrina, the public was told that hurricanes would be more numerous and active than ever. Instead hurricane activity was extremely calm for ten years after Katrina. It was a record low for hurricanes.

In April of this year, at the height of the DOGE movement, President Donald Trump ditched 400 climate cultists who were slated to prepare the “National Climate Assessment.”

The howling from the elite media and eco-extremists was extraordinary.

h/t SM

If an international court told the Western world to jump off a cliff, would we do it? We may be about to find out. The UN’s top court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), ruled on Wednesday that wealthy nations must meet their environmental targets, or else face being sued by the states most affected by climate change.

The case was brought to the ICJ by a group of law students from the Pacific Islands—where countries like Vanuatu are particularly at risk from rising sea levels—and was supported by 132 nations in total. As part of the ruling, Judge Yuji Iwasawa also called climate change an “urgent and existential threat,” said that a healthy environment is a human right, and declared that “states must cooperate to achieve concrete emission-reduction targets.” Those who fail to reduce their fossil fuel consumption could expect to cough up “full reparations to injured states in the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction provided that the general conditions of the law of state responsibility are met.”

Related: Was this Carney’s plan to implement his eco-nuttery?

“Canada”, is officially over.@fancypants_s https://t.co/ABc6LPVy5r pic.twitter.com/Ng2SyNbKP5

— Auntie Polly (@auntie_polly) July 26, 2025

h/t Auntie Polly

On Wednesday, PBS’s Amanpour & Company featured eponymous host Christiane Amanpour interviewing and lamenting to Vanuatu Minister for Climate Change Ralph Regenvanu that rich countries will ignore the United Nations’s International Court of Justice ruling that rich countries must pay reparations to poor countries over climate change.