As a psychologist, I have tried to understand the phenomenon of what is casually termed “crazy liberal women,” or “AWFLs” (Affluent White Female Liberals) — those obnoxious, shrieking, irrational, intensively hateful, intrusive women whose mouths are a verbal sewer and who are forever drawing attention to themselves. One cannot view the women of The View, for example, without recognizing that there is something seriously wrong with them.
Young women have never had more freedom, more education or more money. So why are so many of them so miserable – and so hostile to men? Everyone has a theory. Jonathan Haidt blames the smartphone: girls’ anxiety and depression began soaring around 2012, just as Instagram took hold. Others point to the pandemic, to economic gloom, to universities steeping students in grievance politics, to years of #MeToo messaging teaching girls to see menace in ordinary male behaviour. The results show up in the polls. Only half of young British women now view men positively, against 72% of young men who view women positively – and among women under 25, the figure is barely a third.
All of these explanations play a part. But I think we’ve missed something vital – something that set the stage long before the first iPhone.
“Many men rape; many men giggle encouragingly, or shrug indifferently, when their friends rape. Many men rape, and few seem to think that it’s a very big deal. If anything, cases like the alleged incident at Chi Phi – and many others – show that rape can be a bonding activity for men, a way they celebrate their shared status as men.”
—Moira Donegan, “The horror of the Cornell rape case is how ordinary it is”
If ever I hear of a person who shares my working-class origins but who feels sorry for violent criminals, I know that they’re either a gangster themselves or a raging wet-wipe who’s had their nuts taken off by contorting themselves to fit in with the prison-visiting classes.
Arecent survey shows that a majority of young, Democratic women believe that “the challenges that women face in American society” are due in great part to the behaviors or actions of men.
It’s difficult to assess the prevalence of the Clancy phenomenon, in which a female-dominated consensus, sentimental and vicious, formed swiftly around the alleged suffering and humanity of a woman who killed her three children in a premeditated act.
A YouGov poll from early in September showed that the difference between men’s and women’s reactions to the trial was not as stark as one might have expected from the public furor (women were more likely by about 10 points to support a verdict of not guilty).
It seems like just yesterday that Euphoria actress Sydney Sweeney – who embodies, literally, the traditionally feminine ideal of beauty that drives anti-beauty feminists into a frothing, jealous rage – sparked controversy over her American Eagle ad which facetiously proclaimed that she has “great jeans.” Now she is facing Left-wing backlash for another teasingly sexualized ad campaign, this time for sports trading app Novig, which launched last month.
Novig is doing an ad with Sydney Sweeney. This is what Nike needs…
pic.twitter.com/kIPGbsWW7x— Seth (@seth_fin) September 9, 2026
here’s a little clip from an upcoming documentary making the rounds on social media. It’s from a film called You Can See Everything, which chronicles the final days before convicted felon Elizabeth Holmes is sent to prison.
If you don’t remember who Elizabeth Holmes is, she’s the erstwhile CEO of Theranos —a medical technology company that saw its value rise astronomically during the early 2010s based on claims that it possessed potentially revolutionary medical technology, making Holmes a fortune and winning the accolades of the corporate media for her trailblazing status as the youngest self-made female billionaire.
Following her death last Wednesday at age 92, Gloria Steinem has been described as “a woman who mattered,” “a feminist icon,” and even “the personification of the women’s movement.”
Here, I look at some of Steinem’s early essays (1962-82) outlining her views.
Recently, Peachy Keenan, the pseudonym of a well-known cultural commentator, writer, and critic of modern feminism, asked a question on her X account that succinctly summarizes the state of American feminism and the white liberal woman…
The ideologically-driven stupidity of leftists has been remarked many times, whether on declaring that eunuchs in dresses are real women and can get pregnant, getting the Covid vaccines two, three, four times and still becoming infected with Covid, or the blue-haired Karens with their cow-like rings in their noses. This stupidity is due to fanaticism, and fanaticism tends to halve a person’s IQ.
It’s difficult to be surprised by last month’s Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, entitled “Confronting Antifeminist Ideologies in Canada”—but it is nonetheless remarkable that such tone-deaf anti-male pap continues to preoccupy the Canadian federal government.
The Standing Committee on the Status of Women is the bureaucratic arm of Canada’s radical feminist movement. Its grip on power, consolidated in 1991 with The War Against Women, produced after the Montreal Massacre, is now essentially unchallenged. The Committee is made up of feminist Members of Parliament who consult with feminist academics, organizers, and advocates to advise the Canadian government on its gender policies.
The group of radical female congresswomen who call themselves “the Squad” was supposed to be a triumph for feminism, but behind the scenes they serve as meal tickets for very shady men.
The latest scandal involving the “Squad Husbands” was the dead body of a teenage girl turning up in a house owned by Conan Harris: the husband of Squad member Rep. Ayanna Pressley.
We’re all used to his cringeworthy antics, but last month the Australian Prime Minister excelled himself. Watch him here trying out some schoolboy humour at the expense of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.
In June, the government of Canada’s Standing Committee on the Status of Women submitted a parliamentary report titled “Confronting Antifeminist Ideologies in Canada.”
The report is proof of how petty and out of touch with reality — and with the real threat to women’s rights in this country, i.e. gender ideology — that the federal government truly is. I simply don’t know where to start.
Report Pdf below.
