Trump Derangement Syndrome

Today’s ruling class wants to maintain its power and privilege indefinitely.

Every now and then, liberal elites bluntly say what they think about Americans who support former President Donald Trump. Barack Obama accused them of “cling[ing]” to their religion and guns. Hillary Clinton placed them in a “basket of deplorables” (“racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic”) and advocated their “formal deprogramming.” President Joe Biden has called them a “threat” to democracy. Keith Olbermann said that Trump supporters “must be removed from our society.” MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough claimed that Trump supporters “hate America.” David Frum simply called them “jerks.” In the New Republic, Brynn Tannehill wrote that Trump supporters “love fascism.” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre says that Trump Republicans “fit the definition of fascism.” Sportscaster Bob Costas branded Trump supporters as a “toxic cult.” Most recently, former NBC television host Katie Couric described Trump supporters as “anti-intellectual.”

Friday afternoon featured one of the more disturbing incidents one will ever see on live TV as, amid rolling coverage on cable news and streaming platforms of the Trump trial brought by far-left Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg, a man lit himself on fire in the so-called protest space outside the New York City courthouse.

His conspiracy names both Biden and Hillary why does only Trump get blamed?

The Donald Trump trial took a pause on Friday when a man set himself on fire near the courthouse over a cryptocurrency beef. After the police and medical personnel rushed to the scene, the trial resumed and a jury was seated to begin the case in earnest on Monday. In the words of a dismissed juror to the judge, “Good luck.” 

Judge Juan Merchan’s anti-Trump bias is so bad he isn’t even pretending to make the jury selection process fair.

Earlier this week, Fox News’ Jesse Watters reported on how the process has been rigged against Trump, and he brought up how liberal activists are trying to sneak onto the jury. 

Initial estimates that it would take weeks to seat a jury appear to have relied on a handful of mistaken assumptions.

Monday evening, after the first day’s slog of jury selection in former president Donald Trump’s so-called hush-money trial in Manhattan criminal court, it was being estimated that the process of finding twelve jurors and six alternates could take close to a month. But the pace picked up markedly Tuesday. By the end of the session, seven jurors had been seated.

Just over a third of American voters believe former president Donald Trump acted illegally in the hush-money case brought against him by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, according to a new AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research survey.

If the MAGA movement really were driven by “anti-intellectualism” as Katie Couric asserts, then what in the world does that say about the people who promote Slow Joe Biden to the top tier of non-MAGA, or Democrat leadership?

A dozen Republican-led states plan to send a letter to Bank of America demanding an explanation for why it allegedly de-banked Christian and other conservative groups.

The letter obtained first by DailyMail.com, led by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, demands that the financial institution turn over documents related to its account cancellation policies and requested that the bank update its terms of services to not discriminate against clients with certain political or religious beliefs.

The notice comes after it was revealed that Bank of America sent the FBI and U.S. Treasury private consumer financial data to help the agencies investigate crimes related to the January 6 Capitol protest.

The first day of the first-ever criminal trial of a former president has officially concluded. Defendant and former president Donald Trump was present and called the proceeding an “assault on America.”

At the outset, lawyers spent hours arguing about how much of Trump’s tabloid-fueled sex life should be described to the jury. New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan made clear he wanted the lawyers to show restraint, and at one point when things started to get tense, the judge urged lawyers to “sit down, relax.”

There’s nothing at all funny about putting a former President of the United States of America on trial for misdemeanor record-keeping offenses and turning those into felonies through a badly done magic trick. The underlying reason why the George Soros-selected prosecutor put Donald Trump on trial starting Monday, however, is yet another reason why this case should be laughed out of court.

Get ready for more collusion hoaxes.

It seems that some wokesters in the New York Times newsroom like Israel even less than they like the United States. But maybe the newspaper’s problems go beyond young staffers who learned in college never to tolerate reasonable viewpoints. With general election season upon us, even middle-aged Timesmen are giving every indication that they’re planning to repeat all the mistakes they made covering the first Trump administration.

In the aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, federal prosecutors had to decide what charges to bring against hundreds of participants in the pro-Trump mob that disrupted the certification of a presidential election for the first time in U.S. history.

In more than 350 cases, they included a federal charge that carries a hefty 20-year maximum penalty and is part of a law enacted after the exposure of massive fraud and shredding of documents during the collapse of the energy giant Enron.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, says that he’s in contact with another whistleblower from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ office who intends to expose Willis’s misuse of federal funds.