It’s official that the duke and duchess of Sussex have exhausted the American public. They are now finding themselves embroiled in federal court here after the Heritage Foundation sued the U.S. government for access to the duke’s visa application, which they suspect was given preferential treatment despite Harry’s admission to breaking U.S. drug laws.
If Harry was smart he’d ditch Meggie & use this as an excuse to head back to England.
The Joe Biden administration has been accused of “stonewalling” a legal bid to uncover details of Prince Harry’s US visa application using Freedom of Information laws.
A request to have the application fast-tracked on the grounds of exceptional public interest has been turned down, which has been described as an “outrageous” decision by the Washington-based think-tank pursuing the case.
Hope for Harry? – Prince Harry has ‘finally woken up to the truth’ about Meghan, royal expert says
London’s police are not simply available for private hire
Today, Prince Harry lost a court case. If the law of averages is to be believed, he has involved himself in so many that it was inevitable that at least one was not going to go his way. Still, this particular defeat is likely to be difficult for the Duke of Sussex to take, as it involves one of his most cherished concerns; that of his personal security. The High Court has ruled that the British Home Office’s decision that Harry will not be allowed to pay the police to protect him when he is in the United Kingdom is fair and legal. The Home Office had argued that it would be setting a dangerous precedent if the Duke was to be allowed to rent serving police officers, as if they were private security contractors, and a judge agreed with them.
Harry and Meghan’s “near-catastrophic car chase” happened because they were too cheap to pay for a hotel, sources have revealed.
The entitled couple allegedly demanded the Carlyle — the late Princess Diana’s favorite hotel — give them a discounted room for their New York City visit this week.
Royal moochers.
It’s a car chase that’s turned into a public relations car crash.
Friends of the British Royal Family are reportedly mocking Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s “unraveling” claim that they were caught up in a “near-catastrophic” car chase on Tuesday night.
The Sussexes’ spokesperson released a statement saying the couple was hounded by “a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi” after they left the Women of Vision awards in Manhattan, resulting in a “relentless pursuit” with “multiple near collisions” that lasted more than 2 hours.
I hope this is the beginning of the end. I can’t think of two more unjustifiably entitled individuals.
Two unwelcome imports arrived in New York this week. You may have heard about Harry and Meghan’s big night in the city.
Accounts of their time here differ.
According to the couple themselves they suffered the ordeal of a two-hour, “near-catastrophic” car-chase with paparazzi tailing them all the way.
They have no shame.
The Duke and Duchess of Exaggeration are at it again. They simply cannot stay out of the limelight for long because they value their privacy (or something). Meghan Markle was accused during the coronation of calling paparazzi to take photos of her while she was hiking. There doesn’t seem to be any other explanation for how paparazzi would show up in exactly the right place on a deserted California hiking trail to catch the complaining Duchess mid-hike. American magazines aren’t so interested in the Harkles (as they’re called by some) that they are stalking them, are they? Or is it more likely that the attention-starved woman who didn’t get an invite to the coronation wanted to make sure she wasn’t forgotten?
Piers Morgan, Megyn Kelly and Caitlyn Jenner have all trashed Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s claim that they were caught up in a “near-catastrophic” two-hour car chase in Manhattan on Tuesday night.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex released a statement on Wednesday morning saying that they were hounded by snappers after they left the Women of Vision Awards and headed to a private residence on the Upper East Side.
The New York Police Department responded on Wednesday to reports that Prince Harry, his wife Meghan Markle and her mother Doria Ragland were involved in a “near catastrophic car chase” with paparazzi while visiting New York City on Tuesday night.
NYPD Deputy Commissioner Public Information officer Julian Phillips issued a statement to The Daily Wire confirming the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were escorted by officers while in the city, but said that there were no “collisions” or “injuries” involved in their transport.
Desperate.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are “extremely upset and shaken” after being involved in a “near-catastrophic” paparazzi chase in New York City on Tuesday night.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who were traveling with Markle’s mom, Doria Ragland, were frighteningly pursued by photographers after leaving the Ziegfeld Theater — where the former actress was honored by Gloria Steinem at the Women of Vision Awards — in Manhattan.
Seems like Harry and Meghan were out guarding their privacy again.
Police officers cannot be bought as “private bodyguards for the wealthy”, the Duke of Sussex has been told.
Government and police lawyers said on Tuesday that specialist protection officers “put themselves in harm’s way” and that this should only be done in the public interest. They are defending a judicial review action by the Duke against the Home Secretary for the decision to refuse his request for police protection.
Two questions preoccupied the media in the run up to the coronation of King Charles III: how ‘multicultural’ should the coronation be? And should the royal family atone, or even make financial recompense, for its role in slavery? Last month, the king himself refused to rule out paying reparations for the transatlantic slave trade. Then, on the day of the coronation, we had Bridgerton star Adjoa Andoh complaining on ITV that the royal line-up on the Buckingham Palace balcony felt ‘terribly white’ and unrepresentative of modern Britain.
While the newly crowned monarch was at the heart of many positive stories, commentators were not so charitable about Prince Harry
The coronation of King Charles dominated front pages around the globe, with many observers reflecting that the ceremony marked the modernisation of the British monarchy.
A glowing commentary by Michael Higgins in Canada’s National Post saying that Canadians could “rejoice in our new King”. However, he rejected the “homage of the people”, writing: “Whoever thought it was a good idea that the public — whether they be at home or abroad — should pledge allegiance to the King should be put in medieval stocks befitting a medieval idea. There is something deeply anachronistic and unsettling at expecting the ‘common man’ to pay homage to their monarch. Serfs have served their time.”
LONDON— King Charles III presides over a monarchy in robust financial health. Behind this is a booming real-estate portfolio of bucolic farms, wholesale warehouses and prime London offices that has helped cover a royal spending spree.
No one outside the palace is exactly sure how rich the monarchy is, or of the personal wealth of its incumbent, Charles, who was crowned on Saturday. The institution’s income comes from a variety of sources, including taxpayers, profits from large tracts of land and undisclosed privately held investments.
This disparity will be the Monarchies downfall.
