Trump Embarrasses the ‘Elites’

Donald Trump is still the most popular politician in America.  Despite the best efforts of a Deep State–supporting, fake news–peddling, globalist-puppeteering Axis of Evil dedicated to his disposal, President Trump still stands.  That any man could be so continuously pummeled by the corrupt efforts of America’s criminal (in)justice system, sociopathic officeholders, shady spies for hire, and propaganda-spewing press and yet rise with such vim and vigor is a sight to see!  Courage and resilience in the face of unrelenting torment and scorn tend to galvanize those witnessing the bloody spectacle to the sufferer’s cause.  To remain undefeated while the torturers’ whipping arms become weak and weary inspires legions to remain undefeated, too.  How do great and powerful systems come toppling down?  When one man stands fearlessly before the rot and rancidness with a giant mirror and says, “Look at what you’ve become.”  

Share

If Durham Is So Worthless, Why Is the Ruling Class Worried About His Final Report?

His critics crow over his losses but fear his future findings so much that they are already calling on the Biden DOJ to block them.

The chattering class is crowing over Justice Department special counsel John Durham’s failure to convict Igor Danchenko, the sham primary “source” for the “Steele dossier” that Hillary Clinton financed. Danchenko was obviously guilty of lying to the FBI, but the jury didn’t care. It looks like a cynical acquittal, a product either of the jury’s liberal bias or of its contempt for FBI agents who lie themselves. Jurors may have concluded that these two sets of liars — Hillary’s smear merchants and FBI agents willing to pay them hundreds of thousands of dollars for their smears — deserved each other.

Share

DOJ prosecutors believe they have enough evidence to charge Trump after Mar-a-Lago raid: Report

Justice Department prosecutors in the Mar-a-Lago raid case believe they have enough evidence to charge former President Donald Trump with obstruction of justice, according to a new report.

The team of prosecutors “believe there is sufficient evidence” to charge Trump for obstruction, according to “people familiar with the matter” cited by Bloomberg, but the outlet said that “the path to an actual indictment is far from clear.” The outlet said the DOJ group “has not yet made a formal recommendation” to Attorney General Merrick Garland and that their sources said it is “also unlikely officials would bring only obstruction charges amid several other Trump investigations into potential crimes.” The outlet said charges are unlikely to be filed or revealed prior to the November midterm elections.

Share

Disgraced FBI Agent Says ‘9/11 Is Nothing Compared to January 6’

The September 11 terrorist attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people, were “nothing compared” with the storming of the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, the disgraced former FBI official Peter Strzok said on Sunday.

“I think if you look at the scale in terms of a threat to democracy, I mean, 9/11 was a tragedy, we lost thousands of lives in a horrific way. We still mourn to this day. But when you look at something that is an attack on democracy, something that could actually bring about a fundamental change to American governance as we understand it, 9/11 is nothing compared to January 6,” Strzok told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, one of the lowest-rated hosts on network television.

Share

Will James Comey and Robert Mueller Be Prosecuted for Lies John Durham Uncovered?

While special counsel John Durham’s prosecution of Steele dossier source Igor Danchenko appears to be headed toward acquittal, Durham has used the trial to make public a number of revelations that cast the entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative in a fresh light.

Most prominently, Durham revealed that on Oct. 3, 2016, the FBI had offered dossier author Christopher Steele up to $1 million to provide any information, physical evidence, or documentary evidence that could back up the claims in his dossier. But despite the huge reward on offer, Steele did not provide any such information.

Share

The Danchenko Trial Is a Window on the Corrupt Ruling Class

We will soon learn even more disgraceful details.

The Igor Danchenko trial, which started this week, has already yielded embarrassing revelations about the “Steele dossier” fiasco. The FBI, it turns out, offered Christopher Steele, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s opposition researcher, $1 million to prove his claims about Trump–Russia collusion. He couldn’t do it. But that didn’t stop the FBI from using his tissue of lies to obtain a search warrant against Carter Page, a hapless Trump campaign volunteer.

Share

Utter proof the FBI framed Trump and shielded Hunter Biden

Igor Danchenko is on trial, but so is the FBI.

That is the theme of Russiagate special counsel John Durham’s prosecution of Danchenko, heading into its third day of trial in Alexandria, Va., federal court.

Danchenko is charged with five counts of lying to the FBI about two of his sources for what became the infamous “Steele dossier” — a compilation of faux intelligence reports, mainly authored by former British spy Christopher Steele, that portrayed the GOP’s then-presidential candidate, Donald Trump, as a clandestine agent of Russia.

Share

Durham witness: FBI offered Steele $1M for proof of dossier claims, but he had none

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia — The FBI offered British ex-spy Christopher Steele an “incentive” of up to $1 million if he could prove the allegations in his since-discredited anti-Trump dossier, but the former MI6 agent was unable to back up his claims, according to new court testimony.

The bombshell revelation came during special counsel John Durham’s false statements trial against Steele’s main dossier source, Russian-born lawyer Igor Danchenko, who has been charged with repeatedly lying to the bureau about his sourcing for information he provided for the dossier in 2016. Danchenko has pleaded not guilty.

Share

Trump wanted to swap Mar-a-Lago documents for Russia investigation files: Report

Former President Donald Trump tried to cut a deal with the National Archives and Records Administration to exchange boxes of material held at Mar-a-Lago for documents related to the FBI’s investigation of his ties to Russia, according to a report.

Although they never pursued it, Trump floated an idea to aides to try trading Mar-a-Lago documents later raided by the authorities for confidential documents he thought would exonerate him on Russia, per New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Michael Schmidt.

Share

Prosecutors lay out sprawling case against Oath Keepers

Federal prosecutors on Monday laid out their sprawling case against Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and four other members of the far-right militia as it brings rarely used seditious conspiracy charges in one of its most high-profile trials against those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Rhodes is on trial alongside Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins and Thomas Caldwell, each accused of conspiring to use force to overthrow the government — a crime that carries a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.

Share

Submarine Spy Couple Enters Guilty Plea, Again

After a federal judge threw out Jonathan and Diana Toebbe’s previous deal, the Maryland couple agreed to the possibility of a longer prison sentence.

The Maryland couple who tried to sell sensitive submarine nuclear propulsion secrets to a foreign country again pleaded guilty on Tuesday, accepting the prospect of longer prison sentences after a federal judge threw out their original deal as too lenient.

Under the new deal with prosecutors, Jonathan Toebbe, 43, a former Navy nuclear engineer, could serve 27 years or longer in a federal prison. Diana Toebbe, 46, his wife and a former teacher at an Annapolis, Md., private school, could serve more than a dozen years.

Funny how The Times leaves out this little tidbit – Libs Betray America: Submarine Spy Couple Radicalized by Anti-Trump #Resistance

Share

The ‘jail Trump’ mania reaches its sad end

The latest Letitia James lawsuit is so much ado about nothing

New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump, three of his adult children, and other senior members of the Trump Organization on Wednesday. Her suit alleges business and insurance fraud as well as conspiracy for the same, and marks the end of a three-year investigation into Trump and his business.

Share

Key Dossier Source Confirms He Was Paid by FBI for Years

A key source for the anti-Donald Trump dossier paid for by Democrats has confirmed that he was on the FBI’s payroll for years.

Igor Danchenko, who provided information to dossier author Christopher Steele, “was a vital source of information to the U.S. government during the course of his cooperation and was relied upon to build other cases and open other investigations,” lawyers for Danchenko said in a filing lodged in federal court in Virginia.

Share

Lawsuit Accuses Former President Trump of Profiting from a ‘Staggering’ Fraud

Donald J. Trump, his family business and three of his children lied to lenders and insurers for more than a decade, according to the New York attorney general, Letitia James, who accused him of fraudulently overvaluing his assets by billions of dollars in a sprawling scheme. She is seeking to bar the Trumps from ever running a business in the state again.

More TDS.


Trump blasts ‘racist’ NY AG Letitia James for ‘witch hunt’ lawsuit

Former President Donald Trump blasted New York Attorney General Letitia James for filing a “witch hunt” lawsuit against him on Wednesday — as he accused her of being a “fraud” and a “racist.”

“Another Witch Hunt by a racist Attorney General, Letitia James,” Trump raged on his Truth Social platform soon after her office filed a $250 million civil lawsuit against him, his company and his three eldest kids.

Share