‘Detailed But Irrefutable’: Trump To Present Report On 2020 Election Fraud In Georgia Next Week

Donald Trump is fighting back against Monday’s indictment by the Fulton County District Attorney and remains confident that he will be fully exonerated of the charges. The Republican frontrunner announced that he will be defending his stance that the 2020 election was “[r]igged.” This announcement by former president Trump was posted on Truth Social.


Here are the 91 counts Trump is facing in four different cases

Former President Donald Trump is facing a total of 91 charges across four criminal cases — including 13 new raps related to his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia.

A Georgia grand jury indicted Trump, 77, on Monday and charged him with felony racketeering, conspiracy, false statements and asking a public official to violate their oath of office.

h/t Mauser

Share

Trump rages ‘the Witch Hunt continues’ as he is charged with ‘operating a ‘criminal enterprise’ to overturn 2020 election in Georgia with 18 other co-defendants

Donald Trump was indicted on Monday in Georgia for his alleged roles in trying to overturn the 2020 election, with prosecutors using statutes normally seen in mob trials and accusing the former president of being head of ‘a criminal organization’.

Fani Willis, the district attorney for Fulton County, Georgia, secured the 41-count indictment from a grand jury on Monday, and told a press conference the indictment alleged ‘violations of Georgia law arising from a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the election in this state.’

Trump called her ‘an out of control and very corrupt District Attorney’, and declared that the charges were part of a ‘witch hunt’.

Share

Special counsel obtained search warrant for Donald Trump’s Twitter account

Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained a search warrant for Donald Trump’s Twitter account, @realDonaldTrump, earlier this year, according to newly revealed court documents.

Twitter’s initial resistance to complying with the Jan. 17 warrant resulted in a federal judge holding the company, now called X, in contempt and levying a $350,000 fine. A federal court of appeals upheld that fine last month in a sealed opinion. On Wednesday, the court unsealed a redacted version of that opinion, revealing details of the secret court battle for the first time.

Share

Networks Heap 335 Minutes on Third Trump Indictment, 71 Times More Than Biden Mentions

Between the Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning flagship news shows on ABC, CBS, and NBC, the 331 minutes and 56 seconds number ticked up slightly to nearly 335 minutes (344:40) on the third Trump indictment.

This new numbers is 71 times larger than the time these same networks have spent in the same time period (the evening of August 1 through the morning of August 9) on any and all Biden scandals, which remained unchanged at four minutes and 50 seconds.

Share

Could Trump win again?

The legal witch hunt against him has backfired spectacularly.

Whisper it: but Donald Trump could be the next US president. The attempt to bring Trump down via a slew of often-questionable indictments – the latest one for ‘conspiracy to defraud’ the US, over Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election – has not only dragged America closer to banana-republic territory, normalising the pursuit of political candidates through often-stunning feats of legal acrobatics, performed by an increasingly politicised justice system. It has also failed spectacularly. So far, at least.

Share

Can Trump Get an “Impartial Jury” in DC? What the Law Requires

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the accused the right to “an impartial jury.” But it also states that the trial should take place in “the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.” What should happen, therefore, when it is virtually impossible for the defendant to get an impartial jury in that state or district?

Share

The Historic Trump Indictment Looks Like a Stretch

Democratic Ahabs finally caught their Moby Dick. This past week, former President Donald J. Trump appeared before a federal judge to answer for crimes surrounding the January 6 attack on the Capitol. Despite public fatigue with Trump’s many legal problems, Americans should not misreckon the gravity of the case. This is the most important criminal trial in the history of the Republic. But like in the great Herman Melville novel, the pursuit of the great white whale might end up dooming the voyage, not the whale.

Share

NYT Columnist Asks, ‘What if We’re the Bad Guys Here?’ The Answer: Yes, You Are.

In an op-ed piece for the New York Times on Wednesday, David Brooks had the headline, “What if We’re the Bad Guys Here?” In it, Brooks struggles with the question of why Trump has a commanding lead over the other GOP hopefuls and why he seems essentially tied with Joe Biden on a national basis. All of this despite the fact that Trump continues to rack up indictments like a grandma on a winning bingo streak at The Villages.

Share

Trump’s Third Indictment Is Ludicrous

The case should be dismissed for failure to state an offense.

Under the brave new theory of criminal liability set forth in the election conspiracy indictment of former President Donald Trump, former Vice President Al Gore and the members, advisers, and lawyers of his 2000 presidential campaign belong in prison. The same goes for actor Martin Sheen and other Hollywood celebrities for their actions in the wake of the 2016 election.

Let me explain.

Share

Trump indicted for the THIRD time: Ex-President hit with FOUR charges for trying to overturn the 2020 election and accused of stoking ‘violence’ on January 6 with ‘false claims of fraud’

Former President Donald Trump’s legal woes deepened after he was hit with federal criminal charges linked to his attempts to cling to power after losing the 2020 election.

Trump is facing four counts including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and obstruct the electoral count for trying to overturn the 2020 election. The 45-page indictment says he was ‘determined to remain in power’ despite ‘having lost.’

He is already facing 40 federal charges in Florida relating to his handling of sensitive government documents after leaving office, and is due to stand trial in New York next year accused of falsifying business documents after making a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.

Share

Joe Rogan suggests Jan. 6 Capitol riot was a set-up to bring down Donald Trump

Joe Rogan suggested that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot was a set-up by the US government’s intelligence agencies to take down former President Donald Trump.

“The Jan. 6 thing is bad, but also, the intelligence agencies were involved in provoking people into the Capitol building. That’s a fact,” the controversial podcaster said during a nearly three-hour episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience” on Friday.

Share

Trump Faces Major New Charges in Documents Case

Federal prosecutors on Thursday added major accusations to an indictment charging former President Donald J. Trump with mishandling classified documents after he left office, saying he told a maintenance worker at Mar-a-Lago that he wanted security camera footage there to be deleted.

The new accusations were revealed in a superseding indictment that named the maintenance worker, Carlos De Oliveira, as a new defendant in the case.

The revised indictment also added three serious charges against Mr. Trump — attempting to “alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal evidence”; inducing someone else to do so; and a new count, the 32nd, under the Espionage Act stemming from a classified national security document he showed to visitors at his golf club in Bedminster, N.J.

Share

From Behind Bars, January 6 Defendant Tells the Sun, ‘We Will Keep Donald Trump Out of Prison’

From behind bars at the District of Columbia Jail, a January 6 rioter awaiting trial on 11 criminal counts, Edward Jacob Lang, tells the Sun, “If we win this, it will clear the house” — meaning the jail — “and keep Donald Trump out of prison.”

Mr. Lang is referring to an appeal he has lodged at the Supreme Court, which he ventures “may be the most important case of the last decade.” It concerns the applicability to the mayhem of January 6, 2021, of a provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Section 1512 (c)(2) of the United States Code, meant to combat financial crime.

Share