Meghan Markle must not get royal title – petition

I give the marriage 3 years before she gets bored and goes looking for the next sucker.

Meghan Markle is “unsuitable” for royalty, according to angry petitioners. They insist she must not get an official title when she marries Prince Harry.

Furious royalists say Markle would bring shame on the royal family as a divorcee who has been outspoken on issues like Trump and Brexit, as well as appearing on TV with little clothing on.

Markle appears to have the backing of the entire royal family, and was the first unmarried partner to receive an invite to Sandringham for Christmas this year.

However, some members of the public are not so taken with her. An online petition is circulating as hundreds try to stop Markle getting a title.

  • DMB

    What have the royals done in the last 50 years that brought upon honor to that family. They are nothing but a government funded reality t.v. show family with special privileges.

    • The Monarchy will not survive the likes of Harry, I do suspect Charles will be the last King.

      • Blind Druid

        I think they will endure, at least until the Caliphate takes power. Look at all the horrible things their predecessors have done. Lopping heads left and right and killing wives, Popes, other royals and Archbishops. This crew are mild by comparison. Tradition is very strong in the U.K.

      • Norman_In_New_York

        If the monarchy can survive Uncle Andrew, it will survive Harry.

    • Millie_Woods

      More like a freak show.

      • DMB

        You will find more class at Cinderella castle in the magic kingdom at Walt Disney Resort than at Buckingham palace.

  • Ed

    Now we gunna get “black girl tears,”

  • canminuteman

    I have admired Harry is the past, but he is being an idiot now.

    • He was a Lad’s Lad as they say, now he’s just another silly leftist on the public tit.

      • BillyHW

        I totally thought he was gay.

  • Blind Druid

    Some say that Princess Diana was whacked on purpose in revenge for shagging a Camel Jockey. She caused “loss of face” for the House Of Windsor. I would not be surprised, but a tin foil hat does not feel good on my head.
    Regardless — The Royal Boys must have a helluva time dealing with “The Epidemic Of Gold Digging Whores” that they must be constantly exposed to.
    Note: — That phrase has been made immortal by the amazing Bill Burr.

  • deplorabledave

    Another halfrican looking for a soft landing.

    • BillyHW


  • Ho Hum

    I don’t know what purpose the Monarchy serves in the UK but as long as it exists Royal titles should be reserved only for those born into nobility. Prince Williams wife Kate was born a commoner and yet was given the title “Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cambridge”. As a commoner she does not deserve this Royal title and neither will Markle. For example when the Duke of Windsor married Wallis Simpson she did not receive a Royal title. Her official title was “Her Grace the Duchess of Windsor”. Kate Middleton’s title should be “Her Grace the Duchess of Cambridge”. If and when William becomes King Kate should not receive the title Queen but rather the title “Her Grace Katherine Queen consort of England”. The more commoners that marry into the House of Windsor the less mystique the Royal family will have and it will lose the only reason for it’s existence.

  • ntt1

    lots of politics brewing over wedding invites. Harry an megan want both the obamas to be there, but no trump. a terrible mistake if it goes that way. The marriage is unfortunately a bit of a state affair; to snub President Trump would be another nail in the coffin for the monarchy and the consequences of a snub will cost. This will be the last hurrah for the monarchy anyway, prince chuck will bumble it into insignificance

    • pettifog

      Really? You’re not looking forward to twenty years of Charles lecturing/boring us about sustainable farming or global warming?

  • WalterBannon

    bring shame on the royal family?

    a family filled with douches like Charles and Harry?


    time to dump the windsors and bring back the tudors

    • Clausewitz

      I’d settle for the Stuarts.

      • DVult

        Bring ’em back. Lop off the empty head of the impostor Archbishop of Canterbury and a few dozen others. Boot out all the third world moochers. Get some discipline with the lash if necessary. More to follow.

  • At least she’s getting into the whole stupid hat thing, like a real royal.

  • Uncommunist

    Rumour has it that the Invictus Games only allows left leaning veterans an opportunity to participate by excluding necessary paperwork of conservative veterans. Oh and f you Harry.

    • David_Martin

      They also concocted a BS restriction that only nations that fought with the Brits would be allowed to compete, which conveniently excludes Israeli vets but includes vets from virtuous countries like Iraq and Afghanistan. Welcome to the Bizzaro World.

      • Uncommunist

        Would be fun to show up there this year and protest night and day. I’m game. Know any Israeli vets in Aussieland ?

  • David_Martin

    Toronto Star (and Crescent) Op Ed about the “Royal Wedding”…will they or won’t they invite the “lecherous Donald Trump”?
    Regardless you can be damn well sure that a shitload of Arab/Mo dictators will be there.

  • ismiselemeas

    Hey, if it’s ok for Trump’s missus to do soft porn photo shoots it’s ok for Harry’s missus as well.

  • John

    He’s just like his dad…prone to making very poor choices when it comes to women. Markle’s mother is a a bit of an idiot and I suspect that Meagan, when push comes to shove, isn’t far behind.

  • Haven

    They are a lovely couple and she is demonstrating already how she perfectly fits in.