New York Times Admits That Embassy Move Didn’t Lead To Mass Violence

Hope she went easy on the garlic.

President Donald Trump’s decision to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem hasn’t lead to the violence predicted by many in the media, according to a Saturday report in The New York Times.

While editorial boards and cable news talking heads blasted the supposed reckless decision (even a Times editorial published right before the president’s announcement said the move would raise “new tension in the region” and could incite “violence”), instead a “mood of hopeless resignation” overshadows the Palestinians.

Share
  • taxpayer

    Shouldn’t he be “shields down”? Fehzhors on “stun”? Wouldn’t want to get any on him.

  • tom_billesley

    Guatemala announces embassy move to Jerusalem.
    Brace yourselves for more riots.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-42475253

  • Alain

    Normal people already knew the move had nothing to do with the never ending Muslim rioting, just as they knew that a home-made video had nothing to do with the attack on and the killing and raping of the American ambassador.

  • Hard Little Machine

    The Times ran a piece yesterday – a continuation of their annual series at this time of year about how Jews destroyed Bethlehem and all the peaceful peaceloving ‘palestinians’ of peace are sad and miserable there because……..the Jews.