In Cakeshop Case, One Side Argues Sexual Behavior Is Akin To Race, The Other For Speech And Religious Freedoms

The ACLU characterizes the core issue in Masterpiece as not free speech or the free exercise of religion, but discrimination comparable to racial division in the 1960s.

On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, arguably one of the most important free speech and free exercise cases in 50 years. There are not only varying legal interpretations of the case, but political and cultural divisions, typically along partisan lines.

  • Tooth&Claw

    To me it’s simple. If I don’t want to bake you a cake and use my artistic skill to decorate it…you can’t make me. All your money can’t buy my services, and slavery is illegal.

    • It’s not about fairness or labour. It is about special-interest groups using the power of the State for force people to do their bidding.

  • So does this mean that Christians can go to a Gay-run bake shop, and demand cakes for an anti-Gay marriage conference? With decorative writing like: “God Created Adam & Eve; Not Adam and Steve”?

    Not that Christians would do that, because they have better things to do than get into other people’s faces, contrary to homosexual militants.

  • dance…dancetotheradio

    Fags hate cakes.
    It’s got to be the reason they keep picking on bakeries.

  • Uncommunist

    Marxist terrorists have taken over.