Muslim tells Supreme Court it’s normal to butcher wife in front of children

Australia – A RADICALISED Muslim who removed his wife’s right eye before slaughtering her in front of their children told police it was “normal” behaviour in the Middle East.

The brutal killer, who cannot be named to protect the identities of his three children, is facing life behind bars after he pleaded guilty to the horrific killing in June last year.

The Supreme Court heard on Friday how the Broadmeadows man had set out on a “prolonged and vicious” knife attack on his wife at their family home.

He removed her right eye in what is believed to be inspired by the Islamist one-eyed antichrist Dajjal, and cut off two of her fingers while she was still alive.

She bled to death after suffering deep lacerations across her face, neck, arms, legs, back, hips and genitalia.

Share
  • David_Martin

    “Muslim Tells Supreme Court It’s Normal To Butcher Wife In Front Of Children”
    You won’t see this in the MSM.

  • tom_billesley

    We’d feel so enriched and strengthened by diversity such as this, but then he goes and spoils it all by saying something stupid like “it’s normal”.

  • Thinking From First Principles

    Accurate reporting would not say “radicalized Muslim.” It would say “Muslim acting out on his beliefs.”

  • John Boy

    Islamic family values.

  • David Murrell

    Six weeks in a minimum-security prison, to be served on weekends!

  • Hard Little Machine

    Yeah good to know, thanks.

  • Editor

    So, which type of muslim is he? A misunderstander, a mentally ill one, one who’s motives are unclear, a #not all one, a systematically oppressed one? I can’t wait to see how the MSM will spin this one.

  • CodexCoder

    Not all cultural values are equal. This is the big lie of multiculturalism.

    Would the accused in this case have been acquitted if he had been in Ottawa under the precedent of “cultural incompetency”? It is good that the prosecution in the spousal sexual assault trial in Ottawa are challenging the ruling because it sets a very bad precedent.

    Liberals still have to deal with the cultural values of Islam which are implacable.There is no abrogation in Islam. And yes, we need to discriminate against values which defy our legal codes, even if it means being called bigoted or racist or Islamaphobic.

  • David_Martin

    On a positive note – at least Mo did not engage in cannibalism.

  • Observer

    If this had happened in Canada he would have been given an additional penalty of being forced to take $10 million from the government!

  • If this behaviour is “normal”, why have more of it?