Very premature baby’s survival causes pro-choicer to think

From Faith Moore at PJ Media,

Last week, an article on CNN reported that, at three years old, the “most premature baby” ever born is now thriving. Born at just 21 weeks and four days gestation (possibly the earliest any baby has ever been born and survived), baby girl Stensrud is now a “fun-loving, spunky” little girl who shows no ill effects from being born so early. Her premature birth and subsequent survival without any noticeable ill effects is giving doctors hope that, as Dr. Kaashif Ahmad, baby Stensrud’s doctor, says, they will be able to push the boundaries of “how premature a baby can be born and not only survive but have a positive developmental outcome.”

Abortion is one of the most contentious issues in our country today. Because of what each side believes, there can be no compromise. For a long time I was pro-choice. But a miscarriage I had after nine weeks of pregnancy convinced me, for a variety of reasons, that what I had lost was not a clump of cells, but a baby. Which necessarily caused me to flip suddenly (and somewhat reluctantly) from being pro-choice to pro-life. More.

Reality check: One suspects that most pro-choicers will embrace infant euthanasia (“the compassionate choice”) sooner than they will say no to late term abortions.

See also: Taylor Swift vs. the feminist ugly “As proof of her feminist failures, editor Kadeen Griffiths listed Swift’s many faults: not criticizing President Trump, not “publicly support[ing] organizations” like Planned Parenthood and not attending the Women’s March (her tweet apparently wasn’t enough.)”

Share
  • Felix_Culpa

    “One suspects that most pro-choicers will embrace infant euthanasia (“the compassionate choice”) sooner than they will say no to late term abortions.”

    Yes, of course–the sexual revolution takes no prisoners.

    • Clausewitz

      Remember when Obama as a State Senator helped pass legislation that allowed abortions of children partially born? Remember the MSM’s outrage? Yeah me neither……… Progressivism is the first step to the Eugenics Wars. KHHHHAAAAANNNNNNNN.

  • deplorabledave

    Is the number one issue for women the right to kill their unborn children?

    • Clausewitz

      Certainly it is for feminists.

  • Gary

    Sorry Dr.Ahmad….but all of Justin’s Muslims MP’s had to be Pro-Choice to condone killing the baby in the 9th month prior to birth and even if it’s a girl
    in the early stage.
    Justin doesn’t care what value allah and islams put on a human life.
    When Science finds the Gay markers… Justin will defend the right of women to murder a gay baby too .

  • I refuse to call such people “pro-choice”. If they can look at a premature infant, deny his humanity and be fine with killing him, they are pro-abortion or pro-infanticide.

    • Clausewitz

      They are pro choice in a Dr. Mengele sort of way.