Systemic racism is so rare in America, the media just can’t stop lying about it

The process works like this: First, liberal media outlets instantly parachute in to cover the story from the scene. Live coverage and interviews play on emotions, since the facts are murky at best. Anchors earnestly remind viewers “race is an explosive issue in America.

Share
  • Dana Garcia

    Some problems are just too important to be solved.

    Spokeholes gotta have jobs — what would Al Sharpton do without fake racism to yap about?

    • Shebel

      At least he fermented something to bitch about.

  • Shebel

    You gotta admit that most of the ‘deadbeats’ in that room are White.

  • Shebel

    The only thing that stands out in the room is the Lady in green on the Left and the Lady in Red on the Right.
    Can you imaging sitting around all day and doing sweet fuck-all—and getting paid for it.
    What a useless fucking existence.

  • Shebel

    I betcha at least 80% of those assholes in that room have absolutely no clue as to why they are there -looking like idiots.

  • Shebel

    Ah works for the Govmint—-
    Ah am one important mutha fuker.

  • Shebel

    Why don’t 50% of you assholes get up and trash the fucking room ?
    You sit there all day waiting for some ‘jerk-off’ to say that he we will need another day to come to a conclusion because he can’t remember what the fuck he was there to discuss.
    No body cares why any of you are there.
    Nobody cares what you discuss.
    You just there so some brain dead politician can go on TV and say that I have instructed some my best people to have a Private sojourn—
    So that they can advise me – how to move forward with extreme Confidence.
    He has no clue what He moving FOREWARD with—–
    And nobody cares including his Boss.

  • Watchman

    This is why the term ‘Systematic Racism’ had to be invented for racism so subtle, so insidious, so carefully hidden by whites, that there is no evidence that it exists and the only ‘proof’ tendered that it exists is the supporters pointing towards the disparate demographic of minority races in some field compared to the societal racial demographic.

    There is an equivalent, the ‘Systematic Sexism’ which posits the same argument, but uses any occurrence of less than 50% women in any field as positive proof of gender discrimination, as there is no evidence otherwise that such discrimination existing.

    • Shebel

      I never even considered the term ‘Systematic Racism’.
      What do you mean by systematic racism ?

      • Shebel
      • Watchman

        Oops, I meant the ‘Systemic Racism’, but ‘Systematic Racism (and Sexism)’ is also an appropriate term.
        http://grammarist.com/usage/systematic-systemic/

        Systemic is an inherent feature to some body, whereas Systematic claims a planned process towards some goal.

        • Shebel

          Yes- but what do you mean by the term- however you spell it ?
          I am pretty sure that I know what I mean.

          • Watchman

            ‘Systemic Racism’ is just an attempt to gain an advantage based on a claim that the underrepresentation or underperformance of a minority racial group in any area is all that is needed to prove that the majority is guilty of Racism.

          • Shebel

            Shit. I think we are chewing at this same snake from opposite ends.

            That is not it at all. Those fucking double negatives.

            You picked the usual bullshit— to make the White guy a Racist.

            How about over-representation in prison and under performance in school.

            WHITE or whatever colour is in Gov’t people have got to take much of the blame

          • Watchman

            Yeah, I’m pretty sure we’re not disagreeing. I need to consider the whole matter from the viewpoint of those who claim ‘Systemic Racism’ as you have to understand what they believe and why they believe it in order to understand how to dispute this. The only ‘Systemic Racism’ I would agree might exist is the preference of any group, culture, race, or species for others that share the similarities. This is natural though, and I believe it is built in to us through evolution. It does mean that most of us do have to continually monitor our own behaviour to avoid such biases when we have shifted our allegiances from the family, clan and tribe to a larger multi-cultural and multi-racial community.

          • Shebel

            Maybe some of us don’t feel very comfortable shifting to a larger multi-cultural and multi-racial Society.
            That is NOT racism.
            Especially if the shift is all one sided. .

            You just had to go International. .

            Here—- Our whole Society is predicated on keeping the dog down and in his place . .
            It is about using money to turn men into eunocks.
            Destroy the Male—and you destroy the Family. .
            You destroy the Family , You destroy the Culture.
            And then you set up a social system —just to finish off the fucking job.

            I am not wrong.

        • Shebel

          Actually, I think systematic is more accurate and methodical.

          • Watchman

            It probably is, but ‘Systemic Racism’ is a stronger argument for the claimants to receive compensation or to demand that our culture be destroyed to eliminate it. If Racism is so embedded that it cannot be removed, then either the system must be destroyed or permanent compensation must be awarded to compensate for this.

          • Shebel

            A or B . This or That. Tit for Tat.
            You should really get the word Racism out of your head and also this nonsense of permanent compensation.
            You are absolutely correct that the system must be destroyed.
            It is self-destructive.

  • Shebel

    Aww well— no body wants to talk to me—It is OK
    https://youtu.be/0cYCjbfjGkA