Blasphemy Laws? — Dodgy Data Islamic Group Demands Google Censor ‘Anti-Muslim’ Results,

Self-proclaimed hate crime recording group Tell MAMA has demanded that Google review its algorithms to ensure that searches on topics such as grooming gangs and terrorism do not yield “anti-Muslim” results.

Share
  • mobuyus

    When I looked at that picture I automatically thought “this is what the M249 SAW was meant to cut down”.

  • Ed

    Typical tribal mindset. You’re either with us, or you’re the enemy. Can’t peacefully coexist with anyone.

  • Del Evans

    Muzzies are sub human, inbred trash.

  • tom_billesley

    Will Google ensure that a search on the topic “Islam” does not yield “anti-Muslim” results That’s going to be a challenge.

    • Watchman

      It will all be about Peace, Harmony and Light from the religion of islam. Links will be only to media outlets like The Guardian and the BBC with articles about the wonders of islam and how well muslims are fitting in with the xenophobic locals. Any negative articles will never detail the event that triggered it, but will moan about the threat that islamophobia presents and the fear of the backlash against the local muslim community and how some small muslim girl is afraid of leaving her home after an attack killing dozens of kuffar, which itself will be obliquely referred to as an ‘incident’.

  • marty_p

    This is the next step for/in Canada – if you dare say anything (factual or not) against a certain religious group – it’s hate speech.
    What you end up with is the equivalent of Toronto Newscast all points bulletins that proclaim “Police are looking for a man…have you seen a man?…if so call Crime Stoppers at 222-TIPS.

    • Watchman

      So far. In the future of LGBTUVWXYZ politics, gender will be one of those casualties. Then your Toronto warning will become, “Police are looking for a person…have you seen a person?…if so call Crime Stoppers at 222-TIPS.”

  • Watchman

    To me this is one of the symptoms of a failing society, a civilisation on the brink of collapse. We are not taking care of our young. We have social workers believing that the young and inexperienced have the right to pretty much do anything they like: all rights and no responsibilities. Drink yourself up, drug yourself up: it’s freedom. The unwillingness for the state and the state’s institutions to support parental control, the question remains: where were the parents?

    How could it have been handled at the start? The following link gives a hint: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/southall-sikhs-attack-muslims-in-feud-1269779.html. The Sikh community has a reputation for handling accusations of Sikh girls being enticed into sexual slavery without involving the police. Not really surprising since the Sikh religion grew out of the muslim invasion of India and the repression of its people.

    It was difficult – at least two British fathers were arrested by police after trying to save their girls from a grooming gang. http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/239615/uk-police-arrested-parents-trying-stop-muslims-daniel-greenfield

    I’m seeing our civilisation deliberately destroyed by Progressives, SJWs and I’m trying my best to stop it.

  • Literally Hitler

    Yes I’ve often wondered how all the perps named Stephen, Chaim and Theresa in stories of suicide bombings, beheadings and vehicular mass murder never surface. There must be a conspiracy.

  • canminuteman

    In a normal sane society, news like this would lead to pogroms.

  • marty_p

    We can have some fun predicting what search results would be candidates for the “ban”:
    Some examples – feel free to add to my list:
    Followers of what religion have produced absolutely no contribution to science/technology/medicine/human development?
    Followers of what religion have never won a war in the last 200 years unless it was against other followers of the same religion?

    • Shebel

      United Church?

  • Ego

    Know your sharia:
    Reliance of the Traveler (aka sharia), Book R, Section r2.2:
    SLANDER
    Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a person that he would dislike (…).
    Notice that you are slandering a person even if what you say about him is factually true. E.g. calling a person who has beheaded someone and is just wiping his knife a murderer is slander if he doesn’t like to be called a murderer (and he sure doesn’t, he is just obeying Islam, see Book O, o9.1: “The Obligatory Character of Jihad”).
    All “Tell MAMA” is demanding is more Islam.