A Muslim Ban Is Logical, Moral, And Even Libertarian

CNN’s Jake Tapper wanted to know if there was anything that could have prevented the murderous rampage, in Manhattan, by a Muslim immigrant, who had been recruited to live in America for no good reason. Once upon a time that was known as a rhetorical question. To ask the question would have been to answer it.

Share
  • tom_billesley

    Islam will so improve our society …
    Egyptian cleric Mazen Al-Sersawi of Al-Azhar University says men can marry their own daughters provided they are born out of wedlock.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5049199/Egyptian-cleric-says-men-marry-daughters.html

    • Martin B

      Genes are un-islamic.

    • Solo712

      Good to know!

  • vwVwwVwv

    There is no Letter P in Arabic, the language of Islam because there is no Peace with Islam.

    • tom_billesley

      Taking the “P” out of Arabs is so easy.

      • vwVwwVwv

        Really they don’t have a P, watch!
        https://youtu.be/276sHUxK4nk

        • tom_billesley

          Yep. Taking the P. is a British euphemism for “Taking the Piss”, which is to ridicule someone or something. I like the video.

          • vwVwwVwv

            Now I got you, thanks.

  • Observer

    Islam is nothing to lose your head over.

  • JoKeR
  • Exile1981

    If there was a P in islam it would be islamp….. given the dimness of the average follower that lamp would have a 20 watt bulb.

  • Norman_In_New_York
    • That bastion of free speech and open discussion? Say it ain’t so!

  • Raymond Hietapakka

    ..come here, nothing to offer, hard realism hits that they’ll be just bums here all their life, re-set and go into muzzle’em victim default mode of Anger…

  • No. It is Islam that should be banned, not Muslims. Banning Muslims would be hideously difficult, hideously expensive, hideously time-consuming, and hideously fraught with inconsistencies, injustices and outright cruelty. Islam, on the other hand, could be banned with a single courageous stroke of a pen, and would require no pogrom of what are mostly passive, cruelly brainwashed Muslims. Islam is the problem, not Muslims.

    Islam is a collective, like an insect colony, and all its Muslims are programmed through “prayer” to serve it and only it. Take away the control mechanism – Islam – and the Muslims will just mill about like headless chickens, devoid of any guiding brain. All mosques should be demolished, all Imams deported, and all references to Islam removed from the public sphere, apart from critical analysis.

    There will be issues, for sure, but this would address the disease rather than just its symptoms. Whatever they say about “online radicalisation” I think it is safe to say that most of the trouble is fomented in the mosques, where children are clearly programmed to hate long before they can read.

    Peddling Islam can then be treated simply as a crime, like peddling drugs, and punished accordingly and ruthlessly. There is thus no sweeping “demonisation of a faith”, or a people, and no hatred of individuals or lifestyles. There is just the simple banning of an organisation on the grounds that it is detrimental to your society.

    The authorities are quick enough to do that for some babbling bunch of neo-nazis that meet in a pub now and then, and sometimes wander the streets shouting. Why is it so difficult to do it for an organisation that, like a cancer, insinuates itself into every tiny corner of your culture with the openly expressed aim of destroying it; one that is responsible for literally millions upon millions of deaths around the world and over the years?

    But our pathetic Western leaders treat Islam – despite overwhelminmg evidence to the contrary – as some wonderfully peaceful and beneficial influence on our lives. They justify this by refusing to draw a distinction between Muslims and Islam, invariably trotting out arguments the equivalent of “I met a Muslim once and he seemed alright”.

    How can anyone with sufficent brain to tie their own shoelaces possibly accept that nonsense? Are our leaders really that stupid? Or are the Americans correct in advising investigators of any problem to “follow the money”?