Clinton and the Rosenbergs: Let’s Dare Call It Treason

To some, any comparison between the Clintons and the Rosenbergs is a bridge too far, yet both gave aid and comfort to a strategic enemy, Russia, aid that enhanced the capability of America’s enemies to wage nuclear war on the United States. The Rosenbergs trafficked in the design of nuclear weapons while the Clintons trafficked in the raw material for nuclear weapons — uranium. It is a distinction without a difference not lost on former deputy assistant to President Trump, Sebastian Gorka.

  • The Clintons belong in jail for these and many other reasons. Also should be in jail, in a sane/just world, Obama.

  • Shebel

    and in the top left hand corner you have –“Race Results”.
    There are many things that we don’t know.

  • Jay Currie

    It is a bridge too far. The Rosenbergs were in it for the ideology; the Clintons were in it for the money.

    You can make a case for the Rosenbergs.

    • k1992

      The reasons one betrays one’s country are not relevant to the validity of the charge of treason. The actions are either treasonous or not; again, motivation is irrelevant.

      • Jay Currie

        Read it again k1992, that was my point.

  • simus1

    The Rosenbergs were chump change. But the principle never changes even on up to Hitlery’s crowd. The crown jewels are carelessly left around and if the loss of secrets is ever detected, it is pinned on the sacrificial silly self important goats put in place to take the rap and shield the priceless higher up real perps. “Hello” Klaus Fuchs and others.