The universe shouldn’t exist, scientists say after finding bizarre behaviour of anti-matter

 

The most elite scientists in the world are still struggling to find why exactly our universe didn’t destroy itself as soon as it came into existence. That’s what science says should have happened – but it clearly hasn’t, since you’re here reading this, as far as we know.

Science has derailed.

Share
  • Drunk by Noon ✓

    The White Male patriarchy!

    • BillyHW

      That’s the best patriarchy.

      • Drunk by Noon ✓

        It’s true!
        All other patriarchies are inferior.
        Oh my God, now I’m a western chauvinist TOO!

  • Malcolm Y

    Oh, see the little doggy.

  • DaninVan

    Contrary to local consensus I’m still here. 🙂
    Mind you the scientists’ consensus about AGW was wrong from the getgo also…
    Probably had something to do with converting Imperial to metric (I told them that was a big mistake, but did they listen to me? NOooo.)

    • DaninVan

      My Late neighbour was a career Experimental Physicist; he had NO use for Theoretical Physicists. Claimed they were totally incompetent.
      Since he’s gone back to being stardust I guess I can’t get his opinion on THIS

      development.

      • canminuteman

        I think they make stuff up to get grant money.

  • Brett_McS

    I’m hoping that it turns out – as is being tested now – that anti-matter falls up instead of down. Hover-boards at last!

  • Lightstream

    I’m Christian and I believe that God made the universe and that’s why it doesn’t destroy itself.

    • tom_billesley

      Or is God the Universe? Endless scope for thought.

    • David Murrell

      As a church-going Baptist and ministry worker, I agree.

    • PaulW

      So do I, but I also believe that He wants us to understand as much as we can – there’s nothing wrong with trying to fathom the nuts and bolts of the universe’s creation (though perhaps a hopeless task).

      • Lightstream

        I agree.

  • tom_billesley

    The “most elite scientists” are often outdone by the lowliest.

  • Is it a calf, a camel, a pony? Notice its left index finger pointing up.

    • Science moves forward by asking difficult questions and looking for possible answers. If no questions were asked or allowed, no answers would be found. That a question is raised is not proof of the stupidity of science, but proof of (ideally) its honesty and objectivity. When science proposes a theory, it is putting forward the best idea it has found so far – without meaning to claim that this is its final position.

    • Turtle.

  • Barrington Minge

    I’m a star man waiting round the ……..sings

  • simus1

    This is a difficult scientific chasm to get across. Much more beer will be needed.

    • Clausewitz

      Scotch and Drambuie is my preferred means of contemplation.

  • canminuteman

    Maybe they should go back and recheck their assumptions, data, and calculations.

  • JoKeR

    They would know all the answers if only they looked towards the science of Islam!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POJdu4HV-Ng