Canada: Land of opportunity for Muslim rapists

Man is found NOT guilty of raping his wife as court rules he genuinely believed he could have sex with her whenever he wanted

A man has been cleared of raping his wife after a judge ruled that he did not know his behaviour was criminal in Canada.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith said prosecutors had failed to establish that the man knew it was against the law to have sex with his wife without her consent.
Justice Smith explained: ‘I find that the accused probably had sex with his wife on many occasions without her specific consent, as both he and she believed that he had the right to do so.’

The case related to an alleged assault in 2002, when the Palestinian woman – who became the man’s wife in an arranged marriage in Gaza – claimed he pulled her pants down and had sex with her despite her asking him three times to stop.

More… Ottawa man not guilty of sexual assault because he thought he could have sex with wife anytime

Share
  • Tooth&Claw

    Then perhaps these men (and I use the term loosely), and women, need to be educated on OUR laws before they immigrate.

    • Liberal Progressive

      But why wouldn’t the judge use sharia law to make the ruling in an Islamic country like Canada?

    • Editor

      It was probably included in the “barbaric practices” section of the Welcome to Canada guide that Justin got removed.

  • Drunk by Noon ✓

    Why is she still married then?

    • BananaSlam

      Death. That is why. You “do not just” divorce a Muslim man…

      That would be fatal. “Honorably” fatal… See what I did there? 😛

      Remember kids: Women are slaves of Islam, and Islam is happiness! So therefore, happiness is Islam and there is NOTHING more better than being happy… ehm, right…?

      So many “happy” women in trash-bags-cloth… I am surprised this is even a topic!

      *over 9000 sarcasm mode off*

      • Drunk by Noon ✓

        Looking at it from an Islamic perspective, why is he keeping her around then?
        This is also from 15-years ago.
        I’m not defending him and it’s not nice to rape your own wife… but then, why are they still together?

    • k1962

      Didn’t they separate in 2013?

      • Drunk by Noon ✓

        Yeah, it look like it.
        They also BOTH thought it was hunky-dory until the wife heard otherwise.
        A better third-possibility of a verdict is to deport them both. Neither of them should be here.

        • k1962

          Our idiot PM thinks that diversity is our strength. And we are getting plenty of these people coming here and they are anything but our strength.

  • deplorabledave

    Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith said prosecutors had failed to establish that the man knew it was against the law to have sex with his wife without her consent.

    The absurdity is too much. That a Supreme Court judge would buy into such stupidity is almost beyond belief.

    • John Boy

      Does that mean that if I can prove I didn’t know that robbing a bank was a crime it isn’t… oh wait, I’m white and not Muslim.

  • Drunk by Noon ✓

    This incident was 15-years ago. I think there might be more to it than we think.

  • Hard Little Machine

    That was settled in the US in the famous 1978 Rideout case in Oregon. You maple suckers are pretty far behind the times.

    • We have an especially strong strain of stupid virtue signaler.

    • Drunk by Noon ✓

      They reconciled immediately after he was acquitted.
      Most feminists that were pushing for the marital rape statute leave that part out.

  • Martin B

    If a Mohammedan believes it, it’s legal. What a fabulous precedent to set.

    • Yes it is a new dawn in Canadian jurisprudence.

      • WalterBannon

        its why vigilantism will eventually come back in this socialist dystopia

    • Yo Mama

      But Mo said I should be choppin’ off da heads of the Kaffur so it must be legal. It’s in da holey koran!

  • laja kurc

    At the very least it was a physical assault. The prosecutors should have also charged him with that crime. Crowns are lazy and not that smart (they’re government employees afterall) and far too many judges are PC.

    • disqusW6sf

      The few smart gov’t employees are LPNs OR licensed practical nurses. They deal with real life and they do not have a baccalaureate degree.

  • k1962

    I guess Kellie Leith’s values test wasn’t so stupid after all. If we are going to take in people from the third world who are raised with Islamic values, we cannot just assume they will learn what is right and wrong in Canada on their own. And since when does not knowing that something is against the law allow someone to be found not guilty of a crime? We are in big trouble.

  • simus1

    Ah divorce court tactics.
    Richard Pryor’s (comedy skit routine memories) experience:
    “We gets to court. I looks ’round. I can peg everone ‘cept …………… I ax my lawyer “Who the 14 year old honey looking fine over there? She a witness to what?”
    Lawyer say “That’s your wife.”
    “I’m fucked” says I.
    “You sure are, he say.”

  • Sid Falco

    Multicultural Canada has failed.

    • Liberal Progressive

      Actually, it has succeeded just like our late leader Pierre Trudeau intended!

  • ontario john

    Another victory for Canadian feminism. Perhaps all three Ontario parties can vote in favour of this Islamic tradition.

    • ImNoDhimmi

      This is not a victory for feminists or for any Canadian. Different rules for different religions? Sharia law arrives in Canada!

  • ALL of Canada is a land of opportunity for rapists.

    How many women are permitted even to own batons (let alone guns) for self-protection? How many rapists plead to lesser deals? Sentencing circles?

  • WalterBannon

    after a judge ruled that he did not know his behaviour was criminal in Canada.

    Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith said prosecutors had failed to establish that the man knew it was against the law

    what part of ignorance of the law not being a defense does inJustice Robert Smith not get?

    disbar him, remove him from the bench

  • clearsky

    Canadian courts started enforcing Shariah.

  • Exile1981

    What happened to the rule that not knowing the law didn’t exempt you from the consequences of breaking the law?

  • marty_p

    They’re Palestinians – give the guy a beak – he was traumatized by the Israeli occupation.

  • Fleshlam

    “Ottawa man not guilty of sexual assault because he thought he could have sex with wife anytime”

    Well doh! Woman + Islam = slave = toy. Put a rag over it and enjoy NOBODY giving two shits about i! Perfect hiding place – in plain sight! 😀 ” Sex Toy ” on demand, any time, any place… Islam. I So Love All Matriarch. (I.S.L.A.M.)

  • In a weird way, I can sort of see the judge’s point here. Maybe the rapist really wasn’t compos mentis as we understand it, and maybe his poor unwilling wife wasn’t. Maybe the judge was simply very literal-minded, to wit: “these people really are from another planet. Do you want me to say they aren’t?”. After all, he presumably didn’t have anything to do with importing them.

  • Bless his heart

    F(*** deleted) CANADA.

    Islam Must Die.

  • Marius K

    “Your Honour , the prosecutor has failed to establish that the client could perceive, comprehend and acknowledge the law in his drunken stupor. He even did not know where and why he was driving”