We won’t give back a cent of Harvey Weinstein’s tainted $250,000 says the Clinton Foundation

The Clinton Foundation told DailyMail.com it will not return as much as $250,000 in donations from Harvey Weinstein, saying on Sunday the money had already been spent on the organization’s programs and used for charitable purposes.

The foundation’s decision comes as politicians and philanthropic groups grapple with whether to return donations they have received from Weinstein, after numerous women stepped forward this month to accuse the movie mogul of sexual assault, harassment and rape.

Over a dozen Democratic politicians have said they will give back or donate Weinstein’s campaign contributions to charity.

  • Dave

    “charitable purposes” Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Good thing I wasn’t slurpin’ back some coffee, I’d need a new keyboard!

  • BillyHW

    The wedding has already been paid for.

  • BillyHW

    Now how the heck are they supposed to track down each and every one of those dollars, so that they can be given back? They could be anywhere by now. Impossible.

  • pike bishop

    Ewwwww. Did the quarter million touch Harvey’s taint?

    • UCSPanther

      He probably touched it with his peen after he jacked it into a potted plant…

      • pike bishop

        It was funny on the Muary Povich show when they turned those blue lights on in the motel and hotel rooms. The high end hotels had just as many turkey tracks as the cheap motels.

  • The Clinton’s hands are so dirty already (and ditto their empty black “souls”) that they can’t distinguish and remove the dirt from that particular source.

  • Because that is simply not what the Clinton Foundation does.

  • HalcyonDaze

    How many other “charities” do the Clintons have under their Jim Baker like empire that they could send this “tainted” money to and appease their idiotic masses?

  • Shebel

    They bombed the Serbs , the Christian Serbs—-
    To make way for the Muslims.

  • Shebel

    I guess the Future of any Democracy is to be Minority White
    and Majority Muslim.

  • David Murrell

    By the $250,000 going to “charitable purposes”, the Clinton’s mean to fat salaries at the CF headquarters.

  • Shebel

    I have theory on why the Clintons only have only ONE ugly daughter.

    It is because they didn’t want TWO of them. —