Hillary Clinton: ‘Imagine the Deaths’ If Stephen Paddock Used a ‘Silencer’

Following the heinous attack that resulted in 400 injuries and 50 deaths at a Las Vegas concert venue, Hillary Clinton tweeted that she could not “imagine the deaths” that would have occurred if the gunman had used a “silencer.”

  • The Buddhist Butterfly

    These people think they are intelligent.

  • dance…dancetotheradio

    Imagine the deaths if Hillary had been elected.

    • J. C.

      Yep. All that uranium she sold the Russians would be exploding all around us…

  • Is this woman senile?

  • tom_billesley

    Progressives want to block any easing of control on silencers

  • robins111

    They’d be a lot deader if he used a silencer

  • Hard Little Machine

    Imagine if he was tossing statues of Robert E Lee off the roof into the crowd?

    • J. C.

      Or homos…

  • She’s gotta lay off the bottle.

  • Slickfoot

    A ‘silencer’ AKA suppressor, would quiet a 5.56 X 45mm down to around 120 decibels… she’s seen too damn many movies.

  • Solo712

    Hillary has the imagination of a professional “hitperson”!

    • DaninVan

      That’s a slur on hitpersons.

  • Watchman

    Further proof that Hillary Clinton regards everything she sees on TV as fact – which would be surprising as she has long been in the business of turning fantasy into MSM ‘facts’ and facts into fantasy on that same MSM.

    For those unaware, silencers don’t turn any gun’s firing sound into a squirrels fart: that’s just movie tradition and fiction. A fiction, just like people being shown backwards by impacts of bullets, or cars bursting into flame the moment they head off a road down a steep slope. A ‘silencer’, or more accurately a ‘suppressor’ only reduces the sound signature of a gun firing not eliminating it.

    Here’s what happens when you put 700 rounds through a suppressor. The suppressor bursts after around 200 rounds, after which it does nothing at all to the sound. Due to the physics of a suppressor, firing a gun in full auto almost negates the effectiveness of a suppressor. At the receiving end in this particular shooting, the bullets are travelling faster than sound and can sound as loud as a gun going off. Anyone close to the path of these bullets would be in no doubt that they were being fired at, regardless if a suppressor was being used or not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BczhT1ByrXA

    • UCSPanther

      Back in the olden days, airguns were vilified and banned because they were “silent assassin weapons”. Of course, crossbows were also vilified as well at one time as well

      Now, both crossbows and airguns are more common than ever. The same will happen with suppressed firearms…

  • ontario john

    She is one sick bitch. Its a good thing the Toronto Star and people in downtown Toronto still love her.

  • Brett McS

    Those Bosnian snipers had silencers. They were so effective that no one else noticed the gunfire.

  • moraywatson

    Imagine the deaths if M103 creates a silencer.

  • mauser 98
  • David Murrell

    Touching thing to say just after mass murder.