Rotherham Muslim rape gang scandal: Compensation body told abuse victim she ‘consented’

A woman who was sexually abused as a child by a Rotherham grooming gang was refused compensation by a government body that claimed she consented to it.

Sammy Woodhouse was told by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) that she was not “manipulated” despite her evidence helping to convict a ringleader of the gang last year.

She said: “If an adult can privately think that it’s a child’s fault for being abused, beaten, raped, abducted, I think you’re in the wrong job.”

Woodhouse, one of the most prominent survivors of the Rotherham sex-grooming scandal, is one of nearly 700 child victims of sexual abuse who have been refused payments by CICA.

Share
  • Blacksmith

    Everyone of these assholes in positions of authority including the cops and their bosses needs to be tried as accomplices and put into the same prison as those they enabled.

    • WalterBannon

      by prison, I hope you mean hanged from a lamp post

      • Blacksmith

        Well I wanted them to experience some of what they inflicted on these poor children, I would be okay with them all being hung after the pisslamist had violated them for a while, then the pisslamist can be hung too.

    • At the least.

  • Drunk by Noon ✓

    An underaged girl “consented” to rape?
    How many Muslims are on the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA)?
    This needs to be looked at.

    • That’s what I want to know.

      • Frances

        Actually, probably from the same lefty social group that totally ignored the problem in the first place, labeling the young victims as slags and sluts who were totally deserving of their fate.

  • roccolore

    They wanted to compensate the rapists because their “human rights” were violated.

  • Uncommunist

    This is, ime, a prime example of the ‘deep state’ in action.

  • AlanUK

    What is the “Compensation Board” talking about??

    In English Law*:

    “The age of consent to any form of sexual activity is 16 for both men and women. The age of consent is the same regardless of the gender or sexual orientation of a person and whether the sexual activity is between people of the same or different gender.”

    Hence

    “It is an offence for anyone to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 16.”

    NO Ifs
    No buts
    SHE COULD NOT HAVE GIVEN CONSENT.
    SHE IS THE VICTIM, many times over.

    *Reference:
    http://www.fpa.org.uk/factsheets/law-on-sex

    • k2

      Yeah, but … islamophobia!

  • Norman_In_New_York

    The feminist reaction to this: “Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.”

  • vimy

    By compensating her, they would be admitting the system failed her in the first place. Not gonna happen.

    • A Hamilton Guy

      Oh yeh, and the money and all those others who where abused. What a bunch of hypocritical bastards.