Britain needs a “Skip an heir” rule…

Diana reveals she caught Prince Charles sitting on the loo talking dirty to Camilla on the phone and says she would do ‘everything possible’ to stop him becoming king in newly unearthed interview

Note: I’ve tried very hard to avoid posting on these latest “revelations”, sorry if I am deemed to have failed you.

Share
  • tom_billesley

    All I will say is long live the Queen.

    • marty_p

      I bet that every morning when Camilla’s Tampon is shaving as he looks in the mirror – he is muttering to himself “Hurry up and die already”.

  • DMB

    With England so rapidly changing I don’t see too much of a future for the British royals. If Prince Charles does take the throne it will not last long due to his unpopularity and age. I do not see this legacy lasting beyond Prince William.

  • andycanuck

    The Commons will go right to Prince William and I doubt the Lords will fight it. Plenty of precedent for it and not just Charles I and for that matter inviting Charles II back.

  • Tooth&Claw

    Revolting, spoiled, self centered, …he and Prince Selfie should find an island somewhere where they can impress each other and leave the rest of us in peace.

    • Clausewitz

      There is a precedent already sent. Remember how Elizabeth II’s father came to be King.

  • Blacksmith

    That is the understatement of the century.

    • DaninVan

      Hear, hear! (But not here!!)

  • ntt1

    if prince chuck manages to ascend it will probably destroy the monarchy in the commonwealth. and Britain itself will have to weigh having an islamophilic twit as head of their Church,and I doubt that will go over well,

  • TruthSerum

    Likely nothing energizes Queen Elizabeth more than knowing this twit will succeed her.

    Long live the Queen!

  • David Murrell

    Unsaid in the article is that Prince Charles is an unmitigated pro-Arabist, much like T.E. Lawrence of a century ago. I don’t look forward to Charles as king. Btw, there is no chance to skip a generation, so much as we want to..

  • Felicia Scott

    Why would Queen Elizabeth, an honorable and admirable monarch, will her throne to a bed-wetting whiner who married a wretched bag lady after abusing his amazing wife Diana, to death? Charles will never be King.

    • Will Quest

      One must never ever forget SAINT ‘ Flutter-eyes ‘ !

  • canminuteman

    When Britain is minority Briton, the monarch no longer serves any purpose at all.

  • laja kurc

    Charles is a weakling just like his great uncle Edward VIII. They were both drawn to unattractive sexually experienced domineering women. Edward should never have sat on the throne and was finally forced to abdicate, supposedly because he chose twice divorced Wallis Simpson over being the King. In reality, both he and his wife were great admirers of Herr Hitler and war with Germany was imminent. He was exiled to the Bahamas where he could do the least amount of damage possible. Charles is not fit to be King and that’s probably why Elizabeth will hold on as long as she can. But it really doesn’t matter because England is over anyway.

    • canminuteman

      I understand that in Anglo Saxon Britain (before the Normans), the kings oldest son wasn’t automatically king. The king would choose the next king. It might be his oldest son, a younger son, a brother, cousin, whoever. It was likely a family member, but not automatically oldest son.

      • Felix_Culpa

        A good system!

  • Hard Little Machine

    The next king will be Muslim

    • Clausewitz

      You’re right if it’s Charles.

  • Nermal

    I believe that Commonweath countries can actually choose who they want as monarch.

    As a New Zealand royalist I put first dibs on King Harry!