Why Is The New York Times Trying To Rehabilitate Communism?

The New York Times has been hosting a series of fond, nostalgic recollections about the good old days of twentieth-century Communism. Have they learned nothing?

Has anyone else observed a striking pattern in the New York Times recently? They’ve hosted a series of fond, nostalgic recollections about the good old days of twentieth-century Communism—the optimism, the idealism, the moral authority. Not to mention the gulags, the squalor, and the soul-crushing conformity.

Share
  • DMB
    • Because communists have made sure since day one that they were never to be blamed.

  • tom_billesley
    • So “Lack of balance” is what they call a stinking load of propaganda and bald-faced lies in the posh circles when even the the left has to be ashamed of the mountain of proof that they’re fellow progressives are at the very least complicit in the slaughter of tens of millions of innocent people. Yah, seems a little out of balance to me too.

  • dance…dancetotheradio

    Because they are fucking commies.

  • BillyHW

    Send them all to live in Berniezuela.

    • dance…dancetotheradio

      How come socialists never migrate to socialist countries?

      • Alain

        They prefer to destroy the countries where they live, since those socialist countries have already run out of other people’s money for the most part.

  • simus1

    Briliant top level western marxists were put off by uncouth monsters like stalin and mao. So their choice was patience and slow incremental subversion of the west. The western world is much more to their liking today so rewriting history to sell a fictional past with a much smoother straighter road is helpful.

  • terrence22

    “Why Is The New York Times Trying To Rehabilitate Communism?” Because they are stone-cold-stupid, irrational, moronic, brain-dead, idiotic fools.

  • txfella

    The Left; They remember everything and learn nothing.