How Christian universities will feel good about dying out

From Carl R. Trueman at First Things:

Tradition ascribes to the Duke of Wellington the saying that the Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton. Today, I suspect the cultural Battle of Waterloo will be won—or lost—on the campuses of Christian colleges, and that in two ways.

The first way is obvious. The expansion of the scope of Title IX legislation by the Obama administration makes colleges that hold to traditional Christian moral positions on homosexuality and transgenderism vulnerable to loss of government funding and to damaging legal actions. We might add the related matter of accreditation: Failure to conform to Title IX will be punished with notations and probable loss of accreditation. Perhaps even more deadly than these threats is the role of the NCAA, as schools that are not “friendly” to LGBTQI students will find that they are unable to compete in sporting events. Sadly, while the choice between sport and one’s faith should not merit a second thought, I expect that this will be the point at which many colleges crack.

How Christian colleges respond to all this will be critical. The desire expressed by some to dialogue with their opponents on this matter is not a good sign. At worst, it represents the cynical prelude to capitulation: “We listened, we heard, we changed.” More.

Reality check: There was a time when scholarship did not depend on government approval. Learning will wither in this atmosphere because any compliant mediocrity beats any non-compliant genius.

See also: Bookstore employee frets at selling un-PC book

Share
  • There is one hell of a lot of mud in the swamp.

    Keep draining it.

  • From the article:

    “The desire expressed by some to dialogue with their opponents on this matter is not a good sign.”

    You cannot reason with mad people.

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      Nor should you compromise with them or accommodate their beliefs.
      Meeting an honorable and well meaning opponent “half-way” should only be reserved for the honorable and well-meaning.

      • How can there be an “honourable compromise” with bigots who target Christian bakeries for easy lawsuits?