‘Ban Cars to Stop Terror’ Says Sweden’s Best-Selling Newspaper After Stockholm Attack

Cars and other vehicles “have turned into deadly weapons”, and should be banished from cities to stop attacks like the one in Stockholm from happening in future, according to Aftonbladet editorialist Eva Franchell.

  • Alain

    Yes indeed, anything to avoid the only common sense solution: ban Muslims and Islam.

    • They live in Cloud Cuckoo Land.

    • BillyHW

      They will ban infidels first.

  • Martin B

    Here we have Karl and Bertha Benz out for a drive in their Benz Viktoria, circa 1894. They don’t look like terrorists to me. I’m thinking it’s not the horseless carriages that need to be banned.

    • Gary

      Karl owes his success to Bertha because the engineers couldn’t figure out how to get gasoline in the engine at the right point and in the right amount.
      One day he saw Bertha using the perfume bottle with pump ball that shot of the fluid as a mist from the tile nozzle.

      Bingo. The carburetor for which Karl was credited for invented the automoblie.

  • Millie_Woods

    I wonder if all Swedes are retarded or if it’s only the ones that have some kind of soapbox to proclaim their retardation?

    Just kidding, they’re all fucking retards.

    • Their entrenched political class certainly is.

    • BillyHW

      The proper term is “chromosomally gifted”.

      • Millie_Woods

        Ya, I’ve noticed most of them are women. They have a problem with too many women in influential positions over there.

    • David Murrell

      Who in their right mind would actually pay money to read the Aftonbladet newspaper?

  • El Martyachi

    What a Saab story.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    A considerable amount of right-wing political terror would do that country a lot of good.
    Now think about the insanity that I just uttered and how sane it sounds when viewed against the current status-quo that is the political reality in Sweden and Western Europe.
    Yeah, interesting times indeed when right wing death-squads are the harbingers of personal liberty.
    Any smart people want to debate that statement with me?
    I’m all ears and would love to be convinced that I’m actually wrong.

    • Jay Currie

      As I said earlier, it needs to get worse, much worse, before these loons wake up.

      And, ya know, further on in the article, the loon writing notes that most cars are driven by men and that banning them would give more “space” to women…So a feminist issue as well.

      Much worse…then better.

      • Drunk_by_Noon

        How much worse?
        I say 10,000 dead Swedes, even in one fell swoop of Islamic terrorism still won’t be enough.
        So then what?
        I say the lowest (in human) costs way out is a French Revolution like purge by their most radical right wing fringe elements of their government and institutions and media.
        I just don’t see any other options for Sweden. They are past the point of self-correction, and so under no moral obligations in conduct.
        Their rational middle has been hollowed out and all that is left are a bunch of Pol Pot idolizing Maoists who will either get all of Sweden enslaved or killed if they are not stopped.
        All roads in Sweden lead to darkness and then to pitch black.

  • occupant 9

    Sweden needs to ban everything that might be picked up or moved by a Muhammadan, from the smallest to the largest object, from thimbles to refrigerators.

  • canminuteman


    “It’s not about the nail”.

  • tom_billesley

    The dozy bint. A truck not a car was used in Stockholm, Berlin and Nice.

    • Solo712

      Ok, why don’t we then ban anything that moves on wheels – just as a precaution ?

  • Oracle9

    Ban progressives and solutions will appear.

  • Hard Little Machine

    It wasn’t a car it was a beer truck. Ban beer and trucks.

  • Brian Jones

    Someone needs to explain to those bimbos that if you ban cars and trucks from the downtown core, it becomes very difficult and expensive to bring goods into the shops in the downtown core. Which in itself would irk most feminists, who tend to be consumerists as well. (Many of them are also quite lazy and would not want to hoof it everywhere within the ban zone, but they’ll never admit to it.)

    But aside from that, all that happens is 1. since within the ban zone buses are the main mode of transport, bus bombings become common, and 2. the outlying areas not affected by the ban will start being the go-to places for shopping and gathering, and over time the Muslims notice this and start running over infidels out there. So you either have to move the ban zone or expand it.

    Or, y’know, do what Alain suggested and be rational and get rid of the Muslims and see if that fixes things, but of course that sort of thinking makes you a bad person or whatever, so never mind.