Puzzled by leftists and Islamists working together?

Okay, readers aren’t, but our neighbours and colleagues may be. From Najat AlSaied at Gatestone:

I just wonder where those feminists and John Kerry were when millions of Egyptian women needed their support when they marched against the Muslim Brotherhood, asking for America’s help. Where were they when thousands of Syrian and Iraqi women were enslaved and raped by radical ISIS militants?

While not a single voice among these liberal feminists spoke out against these inhumane acts perpetrated against Muslim women by radical Islamists, a Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer, Linda Sarsour, co-organized the anti-Trump Women’s March on Washington. What’s worse, these liberal feminists want Sarsour to represent all Muslim women, while in fact she speaks for nobody except herself and those who fund her.

Sarsour’s interview with Rachel Maddow on MSNBC was full of false information, yet she was still cheered by several prominent liberal leftists. She said that Muslim children are being executed in the United States [a lie], that Muslims are prohibited from practising their faith [a lie] and that there is opposition to the building of mosques [a lie: There are more than 2,106 mosques in the US]. She also admitted that she wants Islamic sharia law to be applied in the United Sates and is offended that 22 states are opposed to this. All of these lies and allegations were not challenged by MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow. In fact, she agreed with Sarsour by saying, “What is happening domestically around issues about bigotry is spooky”. More.

Reality check: So neither group actually cares about the welfare of women but both want power. Later, they’ll fight it out at our expense and the Islamists will win. There’s a start in understanding our future if we cater to leftist-driven legislation against “Islamophobia.”

See also: Anti-Islamophobia legislation is just the beginning, of course. Much that is considered Islamophobia today consists in baldly stating unpopular facts, such as that Mohammed married a nine-year-old girl and that the Koran gives men the right to beat their wives. Or that a disproportionate number of terror attacks are linked to Islam. How convenient for the Islamist if he is the only one allowed to raise such issues.

Survey results: Political correctness makes people stupid: Part I – the CBC

and

Survey results: Political correctness makes people stupid: Part II Maclean’s

Share
  • Shuali

    Sarsour should be known for what she is – a terrorist hack!!

  • jayme

    A number of people have suggested that the Leftists (tools and dupes as they themselves will be in the end if their alliance with Islam triumphs) are the larger menace, and I agree with that. If there are any true moderate Muslims (I’m personally ambivalent on this point, but I rather suspect there are a very few bona fides) they have no hope of making headway when the Left joins with the head-covering, head-chopping crowd. The Left is and has always been a poisonous, putrid canker on humanity.

    • bargogx1

      If any moderate Muslims dared to speak up against the more repressive aspects of their religion, the Left would surely accuse them of “Islamophobia” and attempt to shout them down. In fact, I think it has already happened.

      • Alain

        Actually the Left already does that.

  • Alain

    What puzzle? They are sister ideologies that share the following traits: totalitarian, collectivists, seek to silence in whatever way it takes those who dissent and disagree with their ideology and bring destruction wherever they go without building anything constructive. Oh, and neither accept the concept of individual liberty and freedom.