Mother on run with children amid custody battle with wife claims authorities ‘blinded’ by gay rights

A woman who left her wife and went on the run with their daughter amid a custody battle has claimed that the authorities have been “blinded” by gay rights.

Lauren Etchells, a teacher originally from north east England, is accused of child abduction and police have ordered an international hunt.

Now the 31-year-old has come forward to describe why she left her marriage to Tasha Brown and justifying the reasons for leaving their home in Canada with their two-year-old daughter Kaydance and her baby son.

  • The Butterfly

    Poor kid.

  • ismiselemeas

    Marriage is a binding legal contract. The child was removed from the jurisdiction and contract in contravention of the Hague Convention. It doesn’t matter what the biological mother thinks. She has abducted a Canadian child and taken it overseas. The law is very clear, she has and continues to break it.

    • And I bet she gets away with it.

      • NORMAN DOSTAL

        nope

    • Kathy Prendergast

      She doesn’t sound like she’s the sharpest knife in the drawer, to begin with. She’s obviously prone to make very impulsive decisions, considering that over a few years she’s married a woman, had a child with her by a sperm donor, left her, and had another baby by the same sperm donor. Unless the woman she married was physically abusing her she had no right to run off with the child when she had allowed her to be recognized as a legal parent.

  • WalterBannon

    hoisted on own petard

    good to see gay marriage is working out so well

    • NORMAN DOSTAL

      please STFU-=we are doing it much better than straights-our divorce rate is 5% lower-eat it, bigot!!

      • Clausewitz

        Seems another progressive troll has found our happy home. Don’t you have some puppies to go kick?

        • Will Quest

          He’s got to cover the killer Dyke phenomena…… the lovee is trying to throw a burka on the issue of rampant domestic violence in gay-paradise …..Whip-me-hurt-me-love-me !

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            that’s been debunked a while now-domestic violence is highest among starlight couples-particulary Midwest area

        • NORMAN DOSTAL

          im a troll because I stand up to anti gay nasty backward hate their lives bigot? OK then! seriously though-is it disturbing that we outnumber you now? Gays and their supporters? No more redneck crap of refusing blacks and gays and jews?

          • Clausewitz

            No you’re a troll because you jump immediately to foolish and incorrect conclusions based upon little or no facts. You believe that anyone that disagrees with you is either a homophobe, a Nazi, or a fool. You’re sense of misplaced self superiority is not in the least bit tolerable on a board that will defend your right to spout such stupidity even when you try to shut down debate through personal attacks.

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            No, phuckwit, that isn’t what Im doing at all. You don’t get it-you cant “disagree” with someone being gay and deserving equality, just like you cannot do that to blacks or Jews. Remember, religious bigots wanted to refuse blacks service in eth 60s because of the Curse of Ham (no souls). But the govt stepped in and forced bigots to comply. It worked, mostly. Same goes for gays-we cannot allow “my god done said” shiit to infest our society. Keep your god at home or in church. Your god is what you make it-most people nowadays don’t go for the “god hates gays” nonsense. ADJUST YOUR GOD OR WE WILL ADJUST HIM

          • Clausewitz

            Yep, case proven.

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            Thank you, finally!!

          • NORMAN, it is at least arguable that your definition of “equality” is more than a little tendentious. Gay activity can be discriminated against in the sense that lots of types of sexual behaviour can (and must, really) be. To paraphrase Camille Paglia (I’d have to look up the quote verbatim), “no woman has ever wanted to have sex in a public toilet”. My point being that a lot of (male) gays tend to be abnormally promiscuous and exhibitionistic. And laws against sexual exhibitionism, and procurement in public places, are merely civilized. Someone’s got to look out for property values.

            Laws against private consenting-adult sexual behaviour are wrong. And haven’t existed anywhere civilized since the 1960s.

            By “equality” I suppose you mean gay “marriage”. But marriage by definition is fundamentally procreative. Gay sex, by definition, and no pun intended, fundamentally isn’t.

            Do you know what’s real marriage discrimination? (Discrimination I 100% support and then some, by the way)? The ban on polygamy. Polygamy, which reduces women to the status of chattel, is a real live human institution that has existed for millennia. The right of one high-status man to marry several women and maybe keep a few concubines is a real, actual thing that is understood throughout most societies on the planet. It had to be stopped. As in wiped out. As in abolished. Basically by the Church, but the pagan Romans and Greeks didn’t go in for it much either. The right of two chaps or gals who like to get it on to call themselves “spouses” and play house and demand everyone keep a straight (NPI) face? Not a thing.

            So, basically, I have no interest in ruining your fun, provided you don’t outrage public morals too much while having it. (For definition of “outrage public morals”, check out footage of any Gay Pride Parade.) But this ridiculous demand to redefine a bedrock civilizational and indeed human institution is really f*cking stupid.

          • NORMAN, it is at least arguable that your definition of “equality” is more than a little tendentious. Gay activity can be discriminated against in the sense that lots of types of sexual behaviour can (and must, really) be. To paraphrase Camille Paglia (I’d have to look up the quote verbatim), “no woman has ever wanted to have sex in a public toilet”. My point being that a lot of (male) gays tend to be abnormally promiscuous and exhibitionistic. And laws against sexual exhibitionism, and procurement in public places, are merely civilized. Someone’s got to look out for property values.

            Laws against private consenting-adult sexual behaviour are wrong. And haven’t existed anywhere civilized since the 1960s.

            By “equality” I suppose you mean gay “marriage”. But marriage by definition is fundamentally procreative. Gay sex, by definition, and no pun intended, fundamentally isn’t.

            Do you know what’s real marriage discrimination? (Discrimination I 100% support and then some, by the way)? The ban on polygamy. Polygamy, which reduces women to the status of chattel, is a real live human institution that has existed for millennia. The right of one high-status man to marry several women and maybe keep a few concubines is a real, actual thing that is understood throughout most societies on the planet. It had to be stopped. As in wiped out. As in abolished. Basically by the Church, but the pagan Romans and Greeks didn’t go in for it much either. The right of two (and why just two!?!) chaps or gals who like to get it on to call themselves “spouses” and play house and demand everyone keep a straight (NPI) face? Not a thing.

            So, basically, I have no interest in ruining your fun, provided you don’t outrage public morals too much while having it. (For illustration of “outrage public morals”, check out footage of any Gay Pride Parade.) But this ridiculous demand to redefine a bedrock civilizational and indeed human institution is really f*cking stupid.

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            I think youre letting your bigotry blind you. Gays dont do anything most straights do, so there’s nothing wrong with their sexual activity. And youre a little ignorant about gay history-gays had to go into “public” places to hide, to have secretive sex-not so much anymore. You clearly dont know many women-ive slept with several women that liked to have dangerous sex-in public, outdoors, etc. Maybe your life has been a little too pristine? How old are you?
            Sodomy laws were on the books up until 2003 I believe-which effectively outlawed gay sex-your dates are off 🙂
            Marriage was NEVER about procreation-that a lie-easily provable. Marriage was created primarily for inheritance reasons -its never, in the USA, been about procreation. Its about legal protection.
            Polygamy almost always victimizes persons-its biblical in origin and most of the bible contains polygamous relationships. Im not against it-if they want to fight for it-I just think there need to be protections in place for abused women.
            I have no interest in public “morals” because most of the loudest shouters are driven by religious nonsense. We will forbid such nonsense in law.
            What you want is really irrelevant-marriage is redefined every few decades. Most of history is polygamy, then 200 years ago it was same race only, then fifty years ago it opened up to interracial marriages, then about ten years ago gays were added, Hardly a bedrock”
            Maybe you should check out a Mardi Gras parade-maybe loosen that pearl clutching a little bit too 🙂

          • “…had to go into “public” places to hide…”

            You’re not firing on all cylinders, mate.

          • Just an FYI Norman, your predilection for inserting your penis into another man’s anus gives you zero moral authority on any matter.

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            Actually, the “none of your phuckign business” clause gives you ZERO moral authority in judging me. Why on earth would you be thinking of me having sex? I certainly don’t picture you and your three billed lady doing it! shudder!

          • Clausewitz

            I meant the case that you’re on insufferable troll. Keep digging.

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            Youre the one on a gay thread, idiot

          • Clausewitz

            I’m on every thread, it’s called keeping informed.

          • NORMAN DOSTAL

            Its called being a closet case with a weird fascination for all things gay, pinky

      • Will Quest

        Trouble in paradise….
        Domestic violence in lesbian relationships
        From

        2 Studies That Prove Domestic Violence Is an LGBT Issue

        From

        A Same-Sex Domestic Violence Epidemic Is Silent

        From

        Lesbian Partner Violence Fact Sheet

        From

        DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RATES ARE HIGHER FOR HOMOSEXUAL COUPLES THAN FOR HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES

        From

        Hush- now HUSH …………………

  • NORMAN DOSTAL

    she must be found and locked up-she is dangerous and damaging her daughter with her evil thinking

  • Kathy Prendergast

    Anyone who names their child “Kaydance” has already forfeited their parental rights, IMO. But in seriousness, it sounds like this woman came to her senses too late and realized that it’s abusive to deny a child a father; she allowed this woman she married to be recognized as her child’s second “mother” on the birth certificate so biology or not, that woman retains the legal right to have access to this child, if not full custody. She should have thought about all this before deciding to experiment on a child’s life, which is what gay couples do whenever they produce these sperm-donor babies and try to pretend to themselves and the world that they made the child together and that they are all the child needs. I wonder how many of these kids really grow up perfectly happy to have “two mommies” and no daddy, or vice versa. Get married to anyone you want, have a baby any way you want, but do not try to convince me that it will be just fine for the child.

  • Behold the train wreck.