NASA: Global Warming Observations Need a Further 19% UPWARD Adjustment

NASA researcher Mark Richardson has completed a study which compares historical observations with climate model output, and has concluded that historical observations have to be adjusted, to reconcile them with the climate models.

  • Denis

    as a retired engineer I always thought that you changed the model to agree with reality! Silly me and after 45 years I will finally get it right!

    • Gary

      For me it was about 36 years ago that a University level Astronomy book featured each planet and it had an example of the Earth’s air and heat circulation caused by the Sun.
      Cold air from the Poles had a pattern as did the Equatorial zone on top of the friction in that zone as the Earth’s surface rotated at about 1100 miles per hour ( angular momentum , my City at 44 degree North is about 740 MPH ) within the various upper Sphere’s from the Stratosphere ( O zone thickness ) to the thinning meso, thermo and exo.

      About 7 years ago I was researching weather patterns and the Tornado alley in the USA for a shipping route by Truck or train . That’s when I wanted to find that Image from NASA to compare it to the areas of the USA . But what i found was a new version that was produce by the people behind the Global Warming hoax that changed how the Sun affected the surface to radiate heat or absorb it which made the Clouds and the Winds.

      The 2D image in colour was much different from the old example, so when I read the notes on the page it was posted at it was just a climate Theory and also a theory for Greenhouse gases.
      Since the IPCC excludes the Sun for how the climate changes because they are bent on fitting their Narrative to blame Humans……I suddenly saw the hoax where they pushed this new Model to match their hoax .
      The image attached does have some factual aspects , but it’s like a very thin veneer of Chocolate on a toxic Mothball where someone assures you it’s safe and just eat it….trust me .

    • WalterBannon

      That was science.

      this is neo-science

      aka cargo cult or junk science

  • Martin B

    What bald-faced fraud.

    All paid for by taxpayers to boot.

  • BillyHW

    Dear Scientists: You’re doing it backwards.

  • Minicapt

    If I remember correctly, Dr Time Ball began his career sorting through Arctic climate records collected by the Hudson Bay Company, beginning in the mid-1670s.


    • dance…dancetotheradio


      • Minicapt

        Hudson Bay Company was established in 1670. Its factors wee required to report on atmospheric phenomena in their reports back to London. That archived material ended up at the University of Winnipeg in the early 1970s when the company’s HQ moved to Winnipeg. Apparently Dr Ball was one of the few people who recognised the value of the archive.


      • El Martyachi

        Oh hey, that reminds me.. belated birthday present…

        • dance…dancetotheradio


    • mauser 98

      Tim Ball has been dragged thru courts trying to shut him up,,basically warming whacks with unlimited gubmint tenure $$ have bankrupted him

  • tom_billesley

    They’ll adjust upwards again when their masters get greedy and decide that they’d like “justification” to accelerate carbon taxes and opportunity-rich green projects.

    Who cares about objectivity when you can bribe or intimidate enough scientists to form a convincing majority. It’s the number of scientists that matter not their quality and integrity.

    Deniers will be prosecuted.

  • mauser 98
  • barryjr

    If the facts disagree with you replace the facts.