Iran cracks down on ‘vulgar Western’ dog owners by seizing pets for ‘vaccination’ then destroying them

The confiscations were the result of a crackdown launched by local prosecutor Mohsen Boosaidi, according to local reports.

Boosaidi said: ‘Keeping and caring for dogs is haram (forbidden) according to religious leaders.

‘If we find out that anyone is keeping and caring for dogs and so is promoting vulgar Western culture, we will deal with them firmly.’

Share
  • That guy is so western I could have sworn he lived in the Annex!

    • Sid Falco

      Every Islamic country, the people are dressed like tramps and winos.

  • Dana Garcia

    Islam hates dogs and music — what else do you need to know?

    • And beer and hot dogs:

      • Dana Garcia

        Yes, beer; they hate the perfect beverage.

      • Minicapt

        Hot dog: the dog that feeds the hand that bites it.
        – Dr Larry Peters.

        Cheers

    • Alain

      The only things not hated are raping, killing, beheading, stoning and honour killings.

  • Hard Little Machine

    Sadly this is the probably the ONLY thing that could turn western liberals against them.

    • Linda1000

      Doubt it, west libtards are too blind. Arabs are typically cruel to dogs but I guess Iran has to get in on the act now.

    • UCSPanther

      These freaks could encase kittens in concrete (Warren Jeffs’ FLDS was accused of doing the same thing as a threat towards a member who dared to commit apostasy) and the left would still defend them to the bitter end.

  • canminuteman

    That’s interesting because I understand that coursing with hounds has been big in some of these places forever. This is where Salukis and Afghan hounds come from.

    • Islam is a crazy maker.

    • Sid Falco

      not as pets though.

    • Alain

      I believe that started pre-Islam and was ignored when Islam arrived since it was such an ingrained tradition. The tribes depended greatly on hunting and that was the reason for the dogs. Falcons were also used by the wealthy guys at the top of the ladder. Still you are correct.

      • B__2

        There are Shari’a rulings that prohibit pet dogs, but the Qur’an expressly still allows hunting dogs (Qur’an 5:4). The bond between man and dog is too great for even Allah to break. This indicates that the Arabs who were prepared to accept a death penalty on homosexuals were not willing to accept the banning the deep bond between a man and his working dog – both of which are part of man’s nature.

        • Alain

          I stand corrected. Thanks for the details.

          • B__2

            My apologies – everything you said was correct – my comment was more a clarification and an addition, not a correction. The domestication of dogs has gone on for at least 14,000 years, and there is genetic evidence that dogs diversified from wolves between 30,000-100,000 years ago with speculation that man’s domestication of wolves being responsible for this. There truly is a case to be made that dogs are human’s best friend. The obvious use of dogs was a force multiplier in hunting: a mutually beneficial co-operation improving the survival of humans and dogs in a hunter-gatherer world.

            And then Mohammed turns up and says that dog’s saliva is unacceptable and unclean (haram), but considers game caught by a dog to be clean and edible (halal). The only way a dog can catch game is via its mouth and so it will inevitably be touched by dog’s haram saliva. This is one of the many contradictions in Islam, but probably because to ban hunting dogs would cause the deaths of many people who relied on them for survival of the family and tribe.

            There is obvious joy of a dog at being reunited with their humans, compared with the indifferent reactions of cats, and universally experienced (and filmed to be put up on Youtube). Dogs are always there for you, cats or hunting falcons are not.

            Qur’an 5:4 mentions hunting dogs and hunting birds, as your comment originally says.

  • Sid Falco

    Dogs were/are sacred under Zoroastrianism, that’s why these iranian “muslim*” scum want to destroy them.

    * the Sunnis are correct, Shi’ism is a vile, syncretic pile of shite and if the Iranians had any guts at all they would throw off their Arab slave religion and re-embrace Zoroaster.

    • UCSPanther

      The Ayatollahs are agents of Ahriman himself…

  • Spatchcocked

    Now if Justine and his election team had promised to bring in 25,000 Syrian canine refugees I would have voted Lieberal.

    • B__2

      Could possibly happen if Justine could find a way to legislate these immigrant dogs to legally vote liberal, and only liberal.

  • jack burns

    They have a superstition that dogs can see into their souls. They routinely torture them. Indians are terrified of dogs too. First hand experience of this.

  • Dog-hating wankers…

  • Alain

    Give us your dogs and keep your Muslims. I have no problem with that.

  • simus1

    Dogs can often detect the presence of lurking government spies and other evildoers in primitively governed total shitholes like iran.

  • Minicapt

    Next? The fat cats!

    Cheers