First, Let’s Get the Facts on Saudis and Iranian Involvement in 9/11

The 9/11 attacks were not civil torts. They were acts of war. It is important to keep that fact in the front of our minds as we press for long-overdue disclosure of evidence linking the Saudi Arabian government to the mass murder of nearly 3,000 Americans, to say nothing of the even more overdue investigation of Iran’s contributory role — an investigation that should have been in high gear immediately after the planes struck their targets.

  • Norman_In_New_York

    This was a great article. However, the National Review took to extensively bashing Donald Trump, the candidate most likely if requested to pursue the author’s recommended course of action, while pushing Jeb Bush, from the the family that did the most to cover up these matters.

    • Ho Hum

      Not surprising since NR is a nest of neocons who want to elect a President who will pursue endless wars in the middle east (and eastern Europe). To that end Jeb Bush or HilLIARy would suit their purpose. They are terrified of Trump because they know he will not be sucked into another neocon war.

      • Norman_In_New_York

        Trump as president may be unable to avoid conflict. The difference here is that if he is the real deal, the man who invokes Patton and MacArthur will fight it on our terms, to win.

  • Ho Hum

    I was lost after “to say nothing of the even more overdue investigation of Iran’s contributory role”

    What evidence is there that Iran was involved in 911? Shia Iran is a mortal enemy of Sunni Saudi Arabia. There is no evidence that Iran – or for that matter Iraq – had anything to do with 911.

    This is nothing but neo-con propaganda.

    • FactsWillOut

      Give it a couple of months, and it’s be “Putin was behind the whole thing.”
      Idiots like smashi will eat it up.

  • Meanwhile Obama was in Saudi Arabia last week to discuss the matter with the Sauds. To get their permission, or why?

    Hard to distinguish between the interests of the Left and the GOP these days.

    • simus1

      Being a good political jockey who gets results that smooth out a
      lot of issues that concern the oligarchs is not without its rewards,
      present and future.

  • A real “leader” would have named the financiers and: 1) nationalized 100% of all monies within the Western banking system, and 2) sent in the military and decimated their military forces.

    That would have gotten their attention.

    Like Osama bin Laden says, people back a strone horse. (But we’ve got a bunch of spineless PC whimps for “leaders”.)

    • johnbrooks3

      There is a good YouTube on “Follow the Money” that points out a lot of stuff that goes unnoticed. Like the Saudi’s giving money to the hijackers and such.

  • johnbrooks3

    Too many loose ends to pin it just on the Saudi’s.

  • Billy Bob Thornton

    So what was the point in the war in Afghanistan and Iraq?

    Seems to me these are just laying the foundation for more wars which people do not want or need.