Clinton ‘greatly concerned’ about possible Trump Supreme Court nominees


“Based on his positions on a number of issues, there is good reason to believe a Trump nominee would seek to roll back our rights, further empower corporations, and undo so much of the progress we’ve achieved,” Clinton will say, according to the aide. Because of this, Clinton’s aide said the candidate will urge voters to put the Supreme Court “at the front of their minds as they consider their choice for President in 2016.”
  • Drunk_by_Noon

    I think she’s way more concerned about what criminal court judge will sentence her after her own criminal trial, if Trump wins.

    • My bet is she won’t be charged at all, that’s how Washington works.

    • They’ll find a way for Jugears to pardon her before January.

    • Bataviawillem

      I pray (although atheist) that I will see the day that happens and next the bumbler from the white house to the big house.
      It will never happen but one can dream.

  • Shebel

    First honest statement from Hillary. ))

  • Norman_In_New_York

    She had better be careful in raising the issue of the judiciary. People are likely to think “double standards of justice” if she opens her mouth too often.

  • Ed

    Says rapidly shrinking Ms. Tone deaf, who can’t imagine why getting $650,000 for a 1 hour speech might ndermine her credibility when carrying on about the corrupting influence of “big corporations.”

  • dance…dancetotheradio

    She says progress I say regress.

  • mauser 98

    Hill skates
    no way Trump will be President
    Washington will not let him near the books , records