Trump refuses to rule out using nuclear weapons against ISIS after Brussels terror attack


But he also said he didn’t want to talk at length about his thoughts because “the enemy is watching”.

By ‘enemy’, he means the GOP.

  • Smart move. I would use the. Starting with Mecca.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    We need cleaner and more environmentally friendly nuclear weapons.
    No really, we do.
    I want to make their use by us more palatable.

    • Ron MacDonald

      Tactical nuclear weapons have a very low yield.

      • Drunk_by_Noon

        But still way too much fallout.
        I’m thinking enhanced radiation weapons.
        Almost no fallout, and the area is pretty safe by as little as a week later.

        • Ron MacDonald

          I have no problem with that.

        • Justin St.Denis

          Nothing unthinkable about it. We are discussing how inevitable their use is. Agree entirely with what you are saying……

          • dance…dancetotheradio

            When are we going to discuss how islam is equivalent to the existential threat the Nazis and the japs?

        • Bataviawillem

          What do you mean ” unthinkable” I think about it all the time.

  • canminuteman

    He is not so dumb as his enemies make him out to be. A weapon that you tell your enemy you will never use is of no use at all. Even if you won’t use it, you don’t tell your enemy that.

    • Norman_In_New_York

      In other words, never say never.

    • ntt1

      But,but obummer told his enemies the exact date of his “tactical withdrawal” and that worked out just fine….,Oh wait….

    • dance…dancetotheradio

      Too rye aye.