Wired on what Apple v FBI is really about

“The loophole is not about Apple unlocking the phone but about making it easier for the FBI to attempt to unlock it on its own. ”

From Wired:

Apple specifically altered its software in 2014 to ensure that it would not be able to unlock customer phones and decrypt any of the most important data on them; but it turns out it overlooked a loophole in doing this that the government is now trying to exploit. The loophole is not about Apple unlocking the phone but about making it easier for the FBI to attempt to unlock it on its own. If the controversy over the San Bernardino phone causes Apple to take further steps to close that loophole so that it can’t assist the FBI in this way in the future, it could be seen as excessive obstinance and obstruction by Capitol Hill. And that could be the thing that causes lawmakers to finally step in with federal legislation that prevents Apple and other companies from locking the government out of devices.

If the FBI is successful in forcing Apple to comply with its request, it would also set a precedent for other countries to follow and ask Apple to provide their authorities with the same software tool. More.

Reality check: This is all okay if we trustin Justin.

See also: Bill Gates does NOT think Apple should build backdoor for government into customers’ phones

Share
  • Raymond Hietapakka

    In the 1880’s there was a native curse to be laid upon any Natives who showed the White Man where the silver mines were…so Weisaw the Indian simply TOLD Oliver Daunais where the Rabbit Mountain deposit was located, in a certain valley, and let him find it for himself…thereby avoiding the ancient curse…

  • Mark DeFord Eletion

    “Bill Gates does NOT think Apple should build backdoor for government into customers’ phones”

    Notice that this case is Apple versus the US government, not Microsoft vs USG. Microsoft’s windows series of operating systems don’t seem to have ever been a problem for governments (or hackers) to break into.