The numbers have it, Islam equates with violence

THE science is settled – Islam is not a religion of peace.

This is not the opinion of some mad, frothy-mouthed, swivelled-eye Islamophobe (although you will be labelled far worse for making any such similar observations), it is a simple statement of empirical evidence. (Note to younger readers – empirical evidence is that which you can actually observe, such as how many legs on a spider, as opposed to “facts” that you’re taught at school these days, such as “Tuvalu is about to disappear under the waves” or “heterosexuality is not the norm”).

The reason it can be empirically observed that Islam is not a religion of peace is because that’s what the numbers tell us, and ultimately, science is merely a question of doing the maths.

  • (my browser firewall blocks that site in a way that it does only with sites that use EXTREME tracking devices. quite rare — checked it several times. fyi for those of you who are privacy/security wonks like myself)

    • How odd.

      • It usually only happens when I ACCIDENTALLY click on a link for a bad porn site. 🙂

      • The file it wants to put on my computer in order to view the article is named: “trustedreferrercheck.esi”

  • Barrington Minge

    So we needed science to work this one out?…I think not.

  • moraywatson

    They had me at “islam is not a religion…”.

    • So what was the “math” argument (briefly) — I can’t read the article. Sounds intriguing.

      • BradThomas

        Here is a direct quote:

        “In all of the worst conflicts in the world – as measured by the number of fatalities last year, that being more than 10,000 – Islam was either attacking itself or being attacked by itself. That is to say, the forces on both sides identify themselves as adherents of Islam.”

        It then noted similar statistics with regard to “medium” sized (1000-10000 deaths) conflicts and “smaller” (under 1000 deaths) conflicts. Of course, last year might have been an anomalous one in terms of Islamic violence but it doesn’t take a huge leap of faith to suggest that pretty well whatever year (from among, say, the last couple of decades) one looked at such data the results would be similarly indicative of the toxicity of Islam. I don’t know if anyone has done that though ….

        • Thanks Brad. Hey, my silly guess wasn’t too far off — its violence is so intrinsic its a “self-immolating” religion one could say. I would still call it a “religion” (to moray’s point above), but a false religion.

  • Tokenn

    All you h ave to do is a] Read some history; b] read the Koran and c] observe the conditions in the Islamic world today. Math skills not necessary.

  • The line in the sand should have been in the Seventies for Islamism.

    It’s take this long for people to wake up?

    God help us….

    • Alain

      Our leaders are still asleep.

      • DavidinNorthBurnaby

        If by “asleep” we mean cowering in silent fear or collaborating with the enemy.

      • They’ve take sleeping pills.

  • DavidinNorthBurnaby

    And still we’re told that “right wing extremists” are a bigger threat to both Canerduh and the Excited States than the poor, misunderstood muzzies. What a crock of crap.