Muslims tortured 1972 Munich Olympic massacre victims – including castrating one athlete while others watched

Palestinian Muslim terrorists who killed Israeli Olympians at the 1972 Games beat and tortured the victims and even castrated one of the hostages while his teammates watched.

The horrifying new details of the cruelty the 11 athletes went through have been revealed by Ankie Spitzer and Illna Romano, the widows of two men who were slain in the massacre, for the documentary Munich 1972 & Beyond.

Documents and photographs after the deadly attack on the Olympic Village, which went on for almost 20 hours, were initially covered up by German police, creating speculation as to how they were treated by their captors.

  • Clink9
  • BillyHW

    Muslims are disgusting animals. Not human.

  • cdnmohamhater

    you are continually crossing off the wrong word. you would go a long way further and be much more truthful if you would put your stroke through the word ‘terrorist’. as a matter of fact just eliminate the word totally and say palestinian muslim, or chinese muslim, or chechen muslim etc. Forget calling them terrorists because it leads your readers who are unaware of koranic scripture doctrine to think that there are two kinds of muslims….those that are terrorists and those that are not. All muslims are terrorists whether bombing or just praying for the defeat of the infidel and jew.

    • All Muslims are not terrorists. It’s an objectively ridiculous statement. This is the kind of bullshit that enables the left to call critics of Islam retarded piss-ignorant bigots.

      • If all Muslims were terrorists we’d be wasting our time fighting terrorism. May as well surrender right off the bat — that’s more than a billion people.

        • Drunk_by_Noon

          Au contraire, that would actually make it much easier.
          There might be a billion or more of them but they would be far from invulnerable.
          I would not trade places with them in an all-out fight to the death.

          • Do you know a billion Westerners willing to have “an all-out fight to the death”? Not enough of us ideologically motivated.

          • Drunk_by_Noon

            What do you think it would be, a one-on-one ‘cage match’?
            Vaccinate, release bioweapons, we win.

          • In that hypothetical scenario you are correct. I’ve said it all along, nuke ’em if necessary.

          • Drunk_by_Noon

            If we are going to practice mass democide, then bioweapons are much more environmentally friendly than nukes.

      • Drunk_by_Noon

        Although I do agree with your general sentiment, I also think we do need to find a word or term that also describes their general culpability in Palestinian terrorism.
        It just could not exist without a willing population to hide behind.

        • Anti-Semitism.

          • Drunk_by_Noon

            No, not strong enough.

      • TerryA

        Sorry, but that’s horse shit. All muzzies are the problem.

        • Maybe so, but “terrorist” isn’t a word vaguely meaning “someone I don’t like” or “a person I wouldn’t trust”. All Muslims are not violent. All Muslims do not have specific political aims that they personally are willing to advance through violence. To say that they are is, I’m sorry, terribly sloppy.

          • TerryA

            Well, I don’t agree. And people who stand in the middle of the road generally get run over. You better get fitted for a burka with your attitude, because that day is coming.

          • Terry, what do you take the word “terrorist” to mean? Does it have a specific meaning for you, or just a general negative connotation?

          • TerryA

            In a nut shell, it means islam. I don’t hate muslims in general, but any so called moderate or peaceful muslim is irrelevant. They will be defeated or cowed by the so called minority muslims. Moderates, if they exist, are middle of the road muslims and will do as they are told by the alledged minority. For a moderate to say guys like Isis is not real islam, is nonsense. And I doubt they even believe their own words.

            Anyway, islam rules by inflicting terror on its followers. Just try leaving. Or being female. Is that terrorism or a peaceful religion? Not that I think islam is a religion at all.

      • Drunk_by_Noon

        And then there is this:

        • I’ve seen that, it’s very good. (Actually I think I posted it.)

          Look, I can’t see why I’m having trouble making myself clear here. DbN, you’re an intelligent man, and we have known each other in the bloggy sense for some time. I’m not defending Islam. Really, do I even have to point that out?

          As a matter of fact I dislike the “good cop” side of Islamism more than I do the active jihadis. There’s not all that much glossing over guys who saw heads off in the street or machine-gun people at concerts, screaming “Allahu Akbar”. The insinuating, whiny little creep who wants to institute blasphemy laws and start passive-aggressive hashtags bugs me a lot more. It’s sort of like the old Nation of Islam I-Prefer-A-Redneck-To-A-Liberal thing.

          No. My point is that saying “all Muslims are terrorists” strips the word “terrorist” of any meaning, and plays into the hands of people who say that opposition to Islam is paranoid bigotry. I’m a pedant, okay? You don’t have to like the Egyptian lady who owns the local dress shop and “fasts” for Ramadan, but to claim that she has any interest in killing anyone is insane. Hysterical. She is no doubt not perfect. Likely she dislikes Jews and doesn’t do enough to denounce her violent co-religionists, with whom she probably to some degree sympathizes, albeit I doubt she’s thought it through systematically. But that makes her a dupe, a fellow-traveler, part of the problem. It doesn’t make her a terrorist.

          Sorry to go on but this all seems very obvious to me. And yet I have to spell it out.

          • Drunk_by_Noon

            Do I have to read all that?
            I’m kidding!!! I joke!!!
            PUT DOWN THE KATANA!

            No, I totally understand what you are saying and where you are coming from.
            I do, I really do.
            I get your point.

            Now I get to the other side of the coin.
            Islamic TERRORISTS, the head choppers with the weird beard kind, could not exist without the express or implied consent of the greater islamic community.
            QED: They are ALL our enemy.
            Every Muslim that has ever given a dime to an Islamic charity has indeed funded terrorism.
            What would you call that level of culpability?

            Getting back to the mafia example, is the little kid that runs “the numbers” back to the bookie a part of the Mafia even though he has never killed anyone?
            No, not in the normal sense of the word, but without a thousand little hands like his keeping the cogs moving, the entire enterprise would collapse.
            There is massive collective guilt here that really does extend to all Muslims, and not just the headcutters.

  • WalterBannon

    All of islam should be exterminated