NOAA refuses US Congress request for climate records

From Nature:

Although NOAA’s latest response to the committee skirted the issue, the agency suggests in a 27 October statement to Nature that it has no intention of handing over documents that reveal its internal deliberations.

Citing confidentiality, of course.

In response to queries from Nature, Smith released a statement accusing NOAA of rigging its temperature records and stonewalling the House committee.

“NOAA needs to come clean about why they altered the data to get the results they needed to advance this administration’s extreme climate change agenda,” Smith said. “The Committee intends to use all tools at its disposal to undertake its Constitutionally-mandated oversight responsibilities.”

Confidentiality is not supposed to protect people accused of rigging the data, unless they are reserving a legal defense.

NOAA spokeswoman Ciaran Clayton denies the accusations. She notes that the agency’s study was peer-reviewed and published in a respected scientific journal, and that the agency has provided the committee with temperature data and briefings on the research.

Peer review means nothing at all nowadays. See, for example, If peer review is working, why all the retractions? and the indispensable Retraction Watch.

“We stand behind our scientists, who conduct their work in an objective manner,” Clayton says. “We have provided all of the information the Committee needs to understand this issue.”

No you haven’t, Ms. Clayton: Those who pay your—and their—salaries want independent investigators to examine and vet the whole process thoroughly.

That said, the window for getting that kind of transparency closes a bit more with each advance of progressive government. With each citizen who waits anxiously for the government cheque, and cannot afford to know what is going on otherwise…

It is interesting to listen to progressives dismiss the rage of scandals around the climate data as a mere blip in the face of overwhelming evidence. They are counting on ‘crats and proles not to see that there is no way of knowing whether there is in fact an overwhelming mountain of evidence, without the rigorous examination the climate establishment wants to stonewall.

People who don’t follow the science beat, as I do, are often surprised to discover the amount of generally accepted bunk out there. Bunk that is accepted in part because no independent investigators were involved in its creation.

That has been disastrous for social sciences, for example, because it allowed monochromatic bias to dominate, with the resulting toxic rain of otherwise avoidable scandals.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    This makes me think they are being dishonest.
    It’s just a hunch of mine.

    • Gary

      Last week on the Radio I heard that September was the hottest on record but it was vague about how it was measured and where on Earth is was the hottest because even if N.American was hotter there are still about 7,000,000,000 other people around the world to make the Mean Temp the same as it was for the last 18 years.

    • Carol Amin


      .…my friend’s half-sister $97 working on a PC onIine……..A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $83, p/h..Learn More right Here….
      ➤➤➤ http://GlobalEmploymentReportsTopStarJobsPop/Get/$97hourly… ❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦

  • FactsWillOut

    Congress should defund the NOAA. Then again they should also defund the ACA, BLM, BATFE, EPA, DOE’s….
    The Kabuki theater continues.

    • Gary

      We should defund the CBC because they too refuse to show the details of their budget which they say is Journalism secrets they don’t want the competition to steal.
      Right…as if CTV and Global want to learn how to piss away $1 billion a year of THEIR money and end up fired for giving huge bonuses and raises to dolts to wasted $5 million on failed projects or buying US shows well above market value.

  • terrence

    Tony Heller regularly picks apart the crap that NOAA spews.

    If you have not checked out what he does, please do: