What the Stabbings in Israel Reveal about Palestinian Society

Do cultures have personalities, meaningful collections of attitudes and behaviors? If so, what does the ongoing wave of stabbings of Israelis—elderly passersby, strangers on buses, boys on bikes, infants in carriages—say about Palestinian culture? Who are they, really?

One suggestion is that Palestinian culture has been overtaken by psychosis. But what is the underlying cause of this flight to unreality?

Part of the answer is sadomasochism.

  • Exile1981

    it’s very simple, islam.

    As soon as islam infests a nation it starts to infuses that society with hatred and a feeling of inferiority that twists the fabric of that society until the most evil of perversions become accepted.

    • Norman_In_New_York

      Islam is the elephant in the discussion room.

    • SDMatt

      Agreed – Islam is the problem.

    • Alain

      In my view it is the offspring of the marriage of Islam with a backwards, tribal and barbaric culture.

  • David

    October 12, 2015

    Muslim inbreeding

    By Carol Brown

    Inbreeding is common in Islamic
    culture. It’s been going on since Mohammed sanctioned first-cousin
    marriages 1,400 years ago. I guess there’s nothing like getting marriage
    advice handed down from one generation to the next that originated with a
    lunatic pedophile.

    PJ Media reports that
    because Mohammed encouraged inbreeding, many Muslims regard intermarriage as
    part of their religion. First-cousin marriages are also viewed as a
    source of social status, as a means of keeping wealth within the family, and as
    a form of control. In addition, it is a vehicle to safeguard families
    against the influence of non-Muslim outsiders, which contributes to insular
    communities that do not integrate into Western society.

    So just how many Muslims are inbred?

    A lot.

    As written in a seminal report by a
    Danish psychologist, Nicolai Sennels, “half of the world’s Muslims are inbred
    as a result of consanguineous marriages.” So we’re talking about one
    billion inbred Muslims. And rising.

    Inbreeding is more common among Muslims
    living in Islamic countries compared to those living in the West. But
    even among those in the West, the numbers are shockingly high. Sennels
    states that more than half the Pakistanis living in the U.K. are married to
    first cousins. Per an article at Bare
    Naked Islam, although Pakistanis account for 3% of births in the U.K., they
    make up 33% of children born with birth defects in the country.

    In addition to increased risk of
    genetic disorders, IQ is negatively affected. Normal IQ averages around
    100. “Low intelligence” is set at 85 or 90, mild disability at 70-79, and
    moderate disability at 50-69.

    Studies show that inbred children have
    an average IQ of 79. One study showed a
    400% increased risk for inbred children having an IQ lower than 70. The
    normal risk for having a child in this IQ range is 1.2%. That risk jumps
    to 6.2% when children are inbred.

    Not surprisingly, children with low IQ
    are far more likely to drop out of school and have limited job skills,
    resulting in limited prospects for employment. In addition, inbred
    individuals are at risk for a wide range of developmental abnormalities that result
    in poor social skills and lack of empathy, among other things. Inbreeding
    also results in a significantly higher percentage of still births as well as
    increased risk of mental illness, including schizophrenia and criminal
    insanity.

    All of these risks intensify as one
    generation after another inbreeds, compounding genetic abnormalities. And
    we’re 1,400 years in with no end in sight. That’s 50 generations’ worth
    of inbred Muslims.

    When you combine an Islamic “holy book”
    that teaches hate with rampant inbreeding, there is no doubt that Islamic
    culture is sub-par (to put it mildly) and not compatible with Western values
    and modernity. And yet this intellectually, physically, and spiritually
    compromised population continues to advance around the globe, gaining ground
    with each passing day.

    How can that be? For all of our
    intellectual, spiritual, and cultural superiority, perhaps we are the fools
    after all.

    (Videos on Muslim inbreeding can be
    found here, here, here, and here. Warning: Many of the images are
    graphic and not for the faint of heart.)

    Inbreeding is common in Islamic
    culture. It’s been going on since Mohammed sanctioned first-cousin
    marriages 1,400 years ago. I guess there’s nothing like getting marriage
    advice handed down from one generation to the next that originated with a
    lunatic pedophile.

    PJ Media reports that
    because Mohammed encouraged inbreeding, many Muslims regard intermarriage as
    part of their religion. First-cousin marriages are also viewed as a
    source of social status, as a means of keeping wealth within the family, and as
    a form of control. In addition, it is a vehicle to safeguard families
    against the influence of non-Muslim outsiders, which contributes to insular communities
    that do not integrate into Western society.

    So just how many Muslims are inbred?

    A lot.

    As written in a seminal report by a
    Danish psychologist, Nicolai Sennels, “half of the world’s Muslims are inbred
    as a result of consanguineous marriages.” So we’re talking about one
    billion inbred Muslims. And rising.

    Inbreeding is more common among Muslims
    living in Islamic countries compared to those living in the West. But
    even among those in the West, the numbers are shockingly high. Sennels
    states that more than half the Pakistanis living in the U.K. are married to
    first cousins. Per an article at Bare
    Naked Islam, although Pakistanis account for 3% of births in the U.K., they
    make up 33% of children born with birth defects in the country.

    In addition to increased risk of
    genetic disorders, IQ is negatively affected. Normal IQ averages around
    100. “Low intelligence” is set at 85 or 90, mild disability at 70-79, and
    moderate disability at 50-69.

    Studies show that inbred children have
    an average IQ of 79. One study showed a
    400% increased risk for inbred children having an IQ lower than 70. The
    normal risk for having a child in this IQ range is 1.2%. That risk jumps
    to 6.2% when children are inbred.

    Not surprisingly, children with low IQ
    are far more likely to drop out of school and have limited job skills,
    resulting in limited prospects for employment. In addition, inbred
    individuals are at risk for a wide range of developmental abnormalities that
    result in poor social skills and lack of empathy, among other things.
    Inbreeding also results in a significantly higher percentage of still births as
    well as increased risk of mental illness, including schizophrenia and criminal
    insanity.

    All of these risks intensify as one
    generation after another inbreeds, compounding genetic abnormalities. And
    we’re 1,400 years in with no end in sight. That’s 50 generations’ worth
    of inbred Muslims.

    When you combine an Islamic “holy book”
    that teaches hate with rampant inbreeding, there is no doubt that Islamic
    culture is sub-par (to put it mildly) and not compatible with Western values
    and modernity. And yet this intellectually, physically, and spiritually
    compromised population continues to advance around the globe, gaining ground
    with each passing day.

    How can that be? For all of our
    intellectual, spiritual, and cultural superiority, perhaps we are the fools
    after all.

    • Exile1981

      Maybe that is why Justin hangs out with Muslims so much, compared to them his IQ of 82 makes him feel smart.

    • H

      “Perhaps we are the fools after all”? Perhaps, but it depends on what a culture or even an individual’s goals are. If it is simply continued survival, breeding, dying, breeding, dying, then perhaps such retrograde cultures are superior.

      I guess earwigs and cockroaches and the like have been around an *awfully* long time. Are they successful species? Yes, clearly, in terms of survival. In terms of say, inventiveness, creativity, contentedness and satisfaction levels, etc., both of the species and the individuals in it, while they exist … perhaps not so much. Of course, these species presumably do not have the physical (mental) capacity for much other than to breed. So there are only so many criteria by which they may be judged. A human society, however, is rather more complex and it is reasonable to evaluate its successfulness based on multiple criteria – not just whether it continues to exist, what its birthrate is, or the length of its existence.

      To sum up (and rather crudely) – quantity (mere continuance and breeding) is not necessarily superior to quality (what the existences and experiences of the culture and its members are like *while* they are in existence).

      • Tom

        Um … maybe you should ease up on the booze?

        • Clausewitz

          Maybe you should ease up on the heroin.

          • Tom

            Maybe you should shut the f*ck up.

          • Clausewitz

            You can dish it, but you can’t take it. Typical.

      • Well stated. The comparison to species is apt.

  • Raymond Hietapakka

    …reminds me of way-old phrases…”you’re a real sucker for punishment” + “you’re your own worst enemy”…

  • Hard Little Machine

    What do you mean why? Who cares why? Do you care why serial murderers kill 50 hookers? Does it matter if mommy drank and uncle creepy touched them? No. They’re defective, that’s all. Lock them up or kill them.

  • Xavier

    I’m well aware that the U.S. isn’t perfect – and from what I hear, Canada might not be either although I’ll leave that for the residents to decide.

    What I will say though is that cultures that defend themselves and place enemy combatants in prisons aren’t necessarily sadists. The actions of a few (Abu Ghraib) does not justify the condemnation of an entire culture.

    Also, I strongly doubt the people who call themselves Palestinians (whatever they actually are) are masochistic. Like the author of this article, I’m not a psychologist but the amount of lying and bizarre propaganda the faux-Pallys use doesn’t indicate masochism. Incompetence, ignorance, and a dependence on a compliant world media – certainly. But not masochism.

    What I’m saying is that the faux-Pallys are inbred, violent, UN-enabled, jew-hating sand monkeys, and it’s erroneous to apply human psychological characteristics to them.

  • moraywatson

    islam

  • Billy Bob Thornton
    • Xavier

      I hope to be long lived enough and financially able to publish, as a self-financed vanity project, a coffee table photo book of the “flowers” I will leave on liberal graves. Lurch deserves several visits.

  • Billy Bob Thornton
    • PRESS TV? As if the Independent wasn’t bad enough. Billy, you embarrass yourself.

  • Billy Bob Thornton
    • Xavier

      How the hell does a British Quaker think he’s going to protect faux-pally olive farmers – and more importantly, why?

      When you place yourself in the middle of a conflict zone, you run the risk of being conflicted in the head.