Why are 28 pages of the Joint Congressional Investigation into 9/11 still classified?

Following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Congress set up a joint committee to investigate. After nearly 6 months, the joint committee released its report – but the Bush administration redacted 28 pages of the report, citing the damage the information could do to our relationships with foreign governments.

  • FactsWillOut

    Harper is like a Kama-Sutra helper in the USA/Saudi bed.

  • Ho Hum

    Not only were the 28 pages redacted to protect the Saudi’s – no doubt it was done also to protect the Bush crime family. They didn’t want the American public to learn of the Bush’s close ties to the Saudi royal family (for instance Osama bin Laden’s brother – Salem – bankrolled George W’s failed oil company).

    Lucky for the Bush crime family that Obama – a Muslim Brotherhood supporter – followed George W into office and kept their secrets safe. Only a President Trump will have the guts to expose the Saudi ties to 9/11 (and Bush ties to the Saudi’s). All of the other establishment candidates be they Republican or Democrat would kept this information secret if elected.

    • Not sure I buy the Bush connection. But I do want the truth disclosed. If the Bush family was somehow involved, all involved need to be tried.

      If the Saudi’s are complicit, it is time for a little zero tolerance. Confiscation of all Saudi assets would get their attention. And help the national debt.

      And a few smart bombs in the middle of Mecca will also do the same.

      • Ho Hum

        I don’t think that the Bush’s were involved to the extent of planning the attacks or even having foreknowledge of the attacks but they were (and probably still are) extremely close to the House of Saud (which is not a secret) and if the House of Saud’s role in funding the terrorist attack was exposed the American public would have scrutinized the close ties the Bush’s have to the Saudi’s. By keeping Saudi involvement secret it was possible to perpetuate the myth that the Saudi’s are “allies” of the United States.

      • FactsWillOut

        No-one said Bush was complicit in 9/11. What is true, is that Bush was and is in bed with the Saudis, and the first thing he did after 9/11 was fly the Saudis out and proclaim publically that Islam is Peace, and spewed a bunch of crap about our Muslim brothers and sisters.
        I wonder how well that would have gone down after Pearl Harbor.

        • If Bush flew the Saudis out of the country after 9/11 he is complicit after the fact.

          Roast him.

  • FactsWillOut

    GWB calling 9/11 a lone wolf attack:


    Fuck him, fuck Obama, fuck them all.

  • bob e

    i would say more like the clinton crime family. you may recall hillary
    landing ‘under fire’ in sarajevo or somewhere. the US was directed to war against the serbs. who are anti muslim. bosnia/kosovo is now a muslim criminal
    paradise .. she has been on the wahabi side forever .. just ask her lover , huma of the ummah ..

  • simus1

    Most likely it shows a double game was being played by the Saudis just like the Dumpsterstanis, the Turks, etc, later, and the Americans were “keeping hands off” while asleep at the switch.

  • tom_billesley

    Advance warnings of 9/11 from the German secret service?

  • Maurixio Garciasanchez

    Lies always hide , the real truth always are in the front of eyes of people .

    • FactsWillOut

      For those with the eyes to see, yes.
      The news media lies, but photos of burning bridges, concrete and steel do not.