Bin Laden’s compound contained leftist literature

Some documents found in Osama bin Laden’s compound were declassified this week, and Rush Limbaugh wasn’t surprised by what was revealed.

“There are books by well known leftists, like Noam Chomsky,” he told his audience. “Bin Laden was reading books with titles like ‘Wage Inequality in France.’ He was a leftist.”

Share
  • JoKeR

    That’s just cool daddio.

    If you want to be a cool hep cat these days, lie around and not work for a living you just have to be a leftist!

    • k1992

      And if you join ISIS you still keep getting your benefits – now that’s cool!

    • Frau Katze

      Great pic!

  • Billy Bob Thornton

    That’s if you believe the Abbottabad raid because the fact is many sites show Bin Laden died in 2001. The reason why many sites continue to show the myth and many have bought into it has to do with both sides trusting everything the CIA says. Don’t forget it was that same CIA that got the intelligence for Iraq wrong. BCF wants to trust Obama on Bin Laden even though many on here want to demonize and not call him America or are birthers. The same with calling him a Manchurian candidate. It says a lot about how selective the right wing is.

    • Billy Bob Thornton

      The question is why do so many conservative media sources ignore the stories related to how the Bin Laden raid was staged and how the real Bin Laden died in 2001? I feel it has to do with wagging Bin Laden at us to make us scared and to wage more wars. It also seems like the left and right in the US agree on the same things. Hmm. Something tells me the US democracy is a show.

      • mobuyus

        So asshole how did a dead bin laden father four children after 2001? Did the CIA remove his sperm after his death? Was there any sperm left, after you had been syphoning bin laden’s prong for years? Tell me, you all knowing know nothing fuck.

        • Billy Bob Thornton

          I know this much that the governments in the West want a controlled populace and dividing us into smaller and smaller groups. Libertarians, nationalists and those outside the mainstream would definitely get behind not wanting large-scale war and these surveillance programs. You believe the articles you want and I will believe the ones that I want. Fox News and mainstream sources tend to parrot pro-mainstream lines. Who’d have thunk it?! Bin Laden was just something to wag at us and war was definitely a huge part of it. The government needed Bin Laden. I am merely against war and trying to promote an anti-war agenda. As for Iran, they have no history of waging war on other nations. The US and Britain lead in that category.

          • Minicapt
          • mobuyus

            Speaking of surveillance programs, did you ever notice that bird flying over your home. The one that never seems to eat or sleep…Ah forget about that. There is however a war whether you believe in it or not. And your iranian masters are up to their jaundiced eyeballs in it. In times of war there is no room for those trying to promote an anti-war agenda. You are only working for your side(iran) in the hopes that my side doesn’t go full WW3 on you fuckers. But it’s coming. We really don’t care what kind of islamic nut bar you are, shia sunni who gives a shit. It is coming and cannot be stopped because you fuckers just can’t help yourselves, it is your nature. Glomming onto the useful idiots of the left will only cost them dearly. I don’t like war, but there happen to be lots of assholes on your side that are in great need of being killed. Oh and I’ve never watched Fox News, My opinions were formed long before you were born, with a little help from islam itself.

          • Billy Bob Thornton

            Remember that Russia and China sat together in Moscow. Russia and Iran have already said that if Iran is attacked that Russia would defend Iran no matter what. Attacking Iran would be the biggest mistake ever because it would mean WW3. The US knows it but the truth is the US is bankrupt and wasted countless trillions on their war on terror. One does not have to be Muslim to not like the US foreign policy, which is based on serving the weapon makers, the Israel lobby, the Christian fundamentalists and those that never met a war they didn’t like aka the neocons. Iraq made it extremely difficult for the political class to get into wars. The public understands that one lie opens up Pandora’s box and once that is open it is extremely difficult to regain trust. As for siding with Iran, I side with no power because they are all interventionists. What we need is more anti-imperialists and people that are anti-war in parliaments and legislatures. Nice try labeling me but you just assume and therefore make an ass of yourself. You don’t know me. I stand with those that want peace because it is the right thing for humanity, not more wars where you don’t understand what your side is supporting. You are supporting it because it is your ideology. It is better to be against war since you have no idea where it will lead to.

          • mobuyus

            And you advocate surrender to your foreign friends,well you’d better start keeping an eye on that bird that never eats and never sleeps. I don’t like your peace it’s not good for Western Civilization. You look to China Russia and iran as utopias why don’t you go live there. I understand well what I support. Given the choice between righteousness and peace I will always stand for righteousness. It’s given us peace and is proven over and over. You’d be better off bird watching.

          • Billy Bob Thornton

            What’s righteous about wanting war on demand? Didn’t Iraq teach you to never trust a politician talking? Why should the US make the laws when all nations should follow the same laws? I view Russia, China and Iran as nations that have small debts, and understand real wealth, while the West is in decline due to inept politicians that think they know best, and follow their own narrow agendas. The West builds societies that are built on debt. Those debts lead to bigger wars, which we are experiencing now. Of course, you wish to follow such people and think they are always making the right decisions. I am only suggesting these things so as to ensure we don’t go into nuclear war. Your side doesn’t take into account these things. You could call it going with the flow. Peace means no war since it advocates policies which focus on domestic policy. Peace in your case which advocates war is dangerous since you don’t know what comes after. At least, I know the strategy of pre-emptive war has been a failure. You are completely in the dark on the subject and of the past 14+ years. The only thing you do is assume. WW3 would happen with attacking Iran. Unless you want WW3?

          • mobuyus

            Don’t trust your friends , our society is based on contract law. Yours run on who is the most corrupt and can kill the most opponents. This I know .He who beats his swords into plow shares is destined to plow the fields of he who didn’t . Keep an eye to the sky and by all means keep talking.

    • mobuyus

      Are you the best iranian intelligence can come up with?

    • Frau Katze

      Please talk sense. He didn’t die in 2001. We know everyone doesn’t agree with us, but crack pottery is going too far.

      • mauser 98
        • Frau Katze

          There was confusion in the early days. But it became clear later that he didn’t die in 2001.

          Do you have a reputable source that is STILL TODAY saying he was killed in 2001?

          • mauser 98

            a reputable source that he was killed in 2011?
            Obama??? ..CNN?..would the Pentagon lie?
            buried at sea to Muslim tradition? total crock

            “Bin Laden WAS NOT buried at sea, but flown to the
            U.S. for cremation at secret location, claims intelligence boss in leaked email”
            Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2111001/Osama-bin-Laden-WAS-NOT-buried-sea-flown-US-cremation-leaked-emails-reveal.html#ixzz3b3XZPdhh

            and 22 Seals from raid killed in helicopter crash,

            22 on same aircraft totally against rules
            ..read about Jessica Lynch Iraq story..a Pentagon fabrication

          • Frau Katze

            I’ll check it out.

          • Frau Katze

            It disputes that was buried at sea, but not that he was killed in 2011.

            They say he brought back to the U.S. and cremated.

            So that’s not a source saying he died in 2001.

          • mauser 98

            OK ..they are lying again
            and then they stop?

  • k

    Was the Leftist literature so he could educate himself on …
    how best to manipulate the Powerful Leftist Western Media?

    • Frau Katze

      Likely.