Germany: Nightclub owner bans ‘aggressive’ refugees

Illustrative photo showing a fight outside a nightclub in the UK.

A Bavarian nightclub owner has introduced a ban on refugees after claiming that they were causing trouble in his establishment.

“You have to understand, until now there was no aggression” in the Amadeus nightclub in Ingolstadt, owner Martin T. told the Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ).

He claims that “the blacks have a problem with women, and the Arabs have a problem with aggression” when they’re on a night out.

Women have been insulted and other guests have been pestered for drinks and had their jackets stolen, Martin said – adding that the problems began when a new group arrived in the town’s accommodation centre last December.

The club isn’t just somewhere to have fun, the owner claims, but a place for asylum seekers to hunt for a German partner.

“They don’t have a lot of chance of remaining here,” Martin said. “They want to find a woman and marry her”…

Related: Lower Saxony: About 1500 crimes per day: Lower Saxony Interior Minister Boris Pistorius presented new crime statistics on Monday and explained this cheerily: “Lower Saxony is a secure State”.

In 2014, the authorities registered 94,549 crimes… In Lower Saxony, 1,514 offences are committed daily.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    A veritable lady killer’s ball.

  • Dana Garcia

    Aren’t nightclubs haraam? Why not hire an imam as a bouncer?

    • lolwut?

      I’m sure with a little digging there’s something in the Quran or Hadith that allows for it if you are hoping to invade a kafir’s country.

      The Quran is the Arabic version of Sun Tzu’s “The art of war”

  • mobuyus

    A life time ago I worked for the Sunshine Theatrical Agency as a driver and liaison with clubs we used to provide Dancers for. “Refugees ” would come in and order a glass of water then try their Don Juan routines on the girls. We would give them five minutes to finish the water under the watchful glare of a club bouncer then tell them to get lost in no uncertain terms. They would never return.

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      Why can’t that be done at the nationstate level?

      • mobuyus

        A lack of compassion and intestinal fortitude would be my guess.

      • Frau Katze

        That’s what we need to do.

      • lolwut?

        In Canada you’d have your license suspended after a single complaint.

  • lolwut?

    This sort of thing has made the news before and a few times in Canada
    which ended up with bars being threatened with having their licenses pulled.

    The bar I go to a lot has a problem with Somalians coming in, ordering a small glass of beer and sipping it for couple hours while harrassing women. they can’t risk kicking them out because the threat of a human rights complaint so they just have the bouncers stick to them like glue so they just pack up and leave.

    One bar in Vancouver went belly up after blacks pretty much took over the place
    and they made no money because they did the usual, buy a glass of beer and nurse it for as long as possible while harassing women.

    Reminds me of the Chris Rock show.

    Grand opening, grand closing.

    • mobuyus

      A number of years ago a Carload of “refugees” in their early thirties would sidle up to a local park and spark up conversations with the 14 and 15 year old girls and then take them to a downtown mall for ice-cream. Local fathers complained to the constabulary about this and were told that since no laws were being broken there was nothing to be done about this. A week later the ice-cream men showed up back at the park. Owing to the presence of about twenty-five concerned citizen fathers and a few mothers all armed with Louisville Sluggers the interlopers left never to return. Same thing happened at a local basketball court Somali youth started intimidating indigenous youth until it became a no go zone for the locals. That all stopped after motor cycle enthusiasts from a local motor cycling club paid the court a few visits. No midnight basketball here. The locals were able to once again enjoy the amenities that their tax dollars had paid for in the first place. I should add that no one was injured in all this but prevailing points of view were strongly put forward. Never give up and never give in.

      • lolwut?

        Public parks are one thing, but a licensed business is another.

        Putting up a fight can put you out of business pretty damn quick
        like that cake business in the USA is one example, they were only saved
        by the successful GoFundMe campaign that raised over $800,000.

        Here in Canada, a comedian got fined $15,000 for fighting back against
        lesbian hecklers in a comedy club.

        • mobuyus

          I think my point was that a determined citizenry with right on it’s side can accomplish much with out resorting to immediate violence. The threat of swift sure overwhelming retribution is often all that is needed to move wrong-doers along,on a more peaceful path. In my two examples there was no violence whatsoever. However non compliance would have brought about a different conclusion. Walk softly and all that. As far as being forced to bake foods for undesirables I would take to the task with relish and it would be bon appetite cock sucker. If you advertise that you will not bake cakes for deviants you will surely be receiving visits from publicity and money seeking deviants. As for the comic and the lesbians I am unaware of any payout as of yet.