Let’s Bully the Anti-Bullying Ambassador!

CanLit dominatrix Margaret Atwood is apparently also Chief Commissioner of what Kathy Shaidle calls the Royal Canadian Fashion Police. The other day she criticized the dress style of the lovely and enceinte Duchess of Cambridge.

  • ntt1

    Atwood has to stop botoxing her upper lip.

  • Surele Surele

    HRH looks gorgeous in anything she wears…Maggie, not so much.

    • Uncle_Waspy

      Some people just look batshit crazy; they can’t conceal it. Maggie falls into that category.

      • Guest

        ➼➼➼I RECEIVED FIRST DRAFT OF $13000!@ak8:



  • DD_Austin

    Atwood is a prevert, and surprise she is also a CBC darling

  • Uncle_Waspy

    It that same column….what the hell was Lauren Harper (the prime minister’s wife) thinking when she accepted the invitation to serve as ambassador at the LGBTQWERTY youth event? This had “ambush” written all over it in fabulous bright pink neon cursive font.

    • Minicapt

      Scorpions, they are …


  • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

    She calls the Duchess’ fashion uneventful. Unbelievable coming from the mouth of one of the most boring Canadian “icons” ever.

  • Norman_In_New_York

    Atwood is an unfunny knockoff of Joan Rivers.

    • Frau Katze

      Very unfunny.

  • dukestreet

    Margaret Atwood has to be about the worst dresser of ever seen. Having been required to read her books as part of my education,was close to the most boring and difficult to get through. I will never read her again and she has no business commenting on anyone else. Typical leftie: Do as I say not as I do.

  • ontario john

    The most over rated author in the history of writing. She was pushed onto the Canadian public not because of any talent, but because she was the poster child for the leftist mindset in this country.

  • Observer

    Someone who railed against the publishing companies demanding they share a portion of their gross revenues will all people claiming to be writers.

    Then thanks to years of getting free money from government funded “Arts Council(s)” she finally gets published and the money rolls in.

    Of course she never shares any of her publishing royalties as well as film royalties with the arts councils who funded her nor does she share her money with the unpublished authors she so much cared about when she was an unpublished author.

    While she still says governments need to be giving (more taxpayer money) to the “arts” she also want tax breaks for well off “artists” like herself.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    I keep forgetting who this “Atwood” chick is.
    My neighbors (who get their newspapers while still wearing their underwear) have more influence upon me.
    She is delusional in her sense of relevance.