Scumbag Muslim Terrorist Entity IRFAN Canada Wants Tax Payers To Fund Its Legal Defense

OTTAWA – The federal government argues that an organization formally branded a terrorist entity last year — and prohibited from raising money — should not be given a state-funded lawyer to wage the first phase of its legal fight.

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney denied the Canadian branch of the International Relief Fund for the Afflicted and Needy permission last November to raise money to fight the listing.

The organization has asked the Federal Court of Canada to set aside Blaney’s decision — saying it’s unconstitutional — and affirm its right to solicit funds to pay a lawyer.

Meantime, the organization — known as IRFAN-Canada — is asking the court either to provide a state-funded lawyer or advance monies under a special provision for such cases.

“The absurdity of this dilemma cries out for state ordered funding in novel circumstances that have not previously been encountered in Canadian law,” the organization says in a new court submission.

Share
  • luna

    Parasitoids.

  • Palidor

    Ha this story is hilarious. Look I think this Hamas loving terrorist entity is to be fully condemned, but how exactly are they supposed to defend themselves if they aren’t allowed to raise money for their defense nor get a court appointed lawyer???

    So funny! The Federal lawyers even argued that Irfan should either represent themselves or somehow find a free lawyer.

    • Minicapt

      They can raise all the money they need, if they tried. However, they are being prohibited from issuing charity receipts for such donations. And the government is unwilling to pay the costs of a suit against it. I’d be thinking of attaching a comprehensive lien to each person on IRFAN’s nominal roll, in order to sequester sufficient funds to cover a future default by the Mohammedans.

      Cheers

      • Palidor

        Not quite Mini. Irfan is a designated terrorist entity and thus prohibited from ANY fundraising. They did not just have their charity status revoked. Irfan asked the Public Safety Minister for an exemption in order to fund raise specifically for their legal defense which the Minister denied.

        So as you can see they are in quite the dilly of a pickle.

        • Minicapt

          I stand corrected.

          Cheers

    • tom_billesley

      There must be plenty of liberal leftard lawyers that’ll do the work pro bono. Why hit the public purse?

  • cmh

    The Charter needs to be eliminated. This will never end while we have this charter. It is our own fault.

  • Raymond Hietapakka

    …F*** Irfan. Love IrfanView…

  • David Murrell

    Puzzling, in the sense that state-funded lawyers are provided for poor- and middle-class defendants, not well-funded “charities”. “Charities” such as IRFAN should pay their own way, as all corporate citizens.

  • Gary

    The fact that this Org has close ties to the hamas-linked CAIR-Canada , this is just a stall tactic to look innocent and allow the Mosques to not comment on their ties to it because it’s before the Courts.

    Hey Justin , wake-up and smell the Burka.