Women with vagina piercings to be classed as suffering from FGM

Hundreds of women in London with vagina piercings will be recorded as victims of potentially illegal female genital mutilation under new NHS rules to be introduced next month.

The mandatory reporting regulations, sent to medical staff by the Department of Health, say that any woman whose labia or clitoris has been pierced must be classed as suffering FGM.

The rules will apply even when women have consented to the piercing and had the procedure in the belief that it will improve their sex lives and enhance their attractiveness.

It means that each of the women will also be classed as a potential crime victim and that those responsible for carrying out the piercing could be deemed guilty of an offence under legislation banning FGM.

Share
  • Stronger Than Dirt

    More insanity from the usual suspects.

    • MannieP

      It is not insanity. It is a calculated effort to legitimize forced clitoridectomy. By lumping piercings along with clitoridectomies and labiectomies, they are attempting to so dilute the law that it is ridiculed and repealed. Next they will be insisting that forced clitoridectomy be paid for by NHS.

      • Ed Ellison

        Just exactly what I was thinking.
        This is just the first step in making the practice not only legitimate, but part of day to day life of the majority.

      • The Goat

        It also shields them from the “racist” accusation.

        • tom_billesley

          To shield them from the “sexist” accusation, they’ll have to record a prince albert as MGM.

      • Stronger Than Dirt

        Point made.

  • Hard Little Machine

    So they will be charge with committing a felony on themselves?

    • MannieP

      Usually, they go to a piercer for the poke.

      • tom_billesley

        It’s a conspiracy!

  • Barrington Minge

    Only the UK could come up with this – nanny state running wild.
    The vast majority of women with pierced bits did it ‘cos they wanted to!!

  • Norman_In_New_York

    Maybe they can extend the ban to women who disfigure themselves with a plethora of tattoos. Yecch!

  • (1) Forced removal of the clitoris by Muslim fanatics in order to decrease sexual pleasure. And (2) Western (free choice) piercing to increase sexual pleasure, do not seam to be the same.

    Only the foolish PC would claim as much,

  • cmh

    They had to do this in order to have a population to go after because if they target only clitless muslims they would be branded as islamaphobic racists.

  • canminuteman

    Any woman who thinks a piercing (other than ear lobes) will increase her attractiveness needs a psychiatrist.

  • simus1

    Pharaonic Circumcision (FGM) is a torture procedure mainly performed on muslim girls aged 5 to 8 or thereabouts to ensure virginity and dampen sexuality which improves marriage prospects to some degree among the pickiest of families seeking matches for their sons.

    The term Vagina Piercings is medically illiterate and smacks of the constant misuse of a word often done by leftists until everyone concedes to their newly minted meaning. A piercing located in the actual vaginal canal would obviously be a lot more problematic during birth than any given one visible near the entrance which is bad enough.

    Perhaps retribution is in order. If all sensible people started calling the extreme tip of the penis, “vagina worm”, would leftists actually get the dig or would they run with it as a perfectly logical extension of their baffle gab?