Why is my government importing people who want to kill me?

Why is my government importing people who want to kill me?

The ususal suspects will think that a horrid question, bigoted, racist, hateful etc etc etc.

I don’t care. It’s a question that demands to be asked.

The fact is my government appears bent on my destruction.

How else to explain their insistence on importing a cult that at best is hatefully intolerant of my existence and that of my family and of course your own.

A cult that routinely spawns murderous terrorists. Not “High Risk” travelers as sugar coated by CSIS and the RCMP, not “victims’ or “militants” as portrayed by our useful idiot media, but bloodthirsty murderous terrorists who seek to join the most murderous branch of their already murderous death cult.

A cult that routinely spews hate from their Mosques, here in Canada. A hate directed at Christians, Jews, Atheists, Gays and anyone else on their never ending list of people to hate on Allah’s behalf.

I would be remiss by failing to point out that Islam is a cult so hateful they expend most of their evil energy killing other cult members in an ongoing orgy of sectarian violence.

Who thought it a good idea to import this cult to Canada? Who makes these decisions? These are questions I have long asked.

Is Citizenship & Immigration Canada ideologically twisted beyond reason and even belief?

Are they in a permanent state of immoral drunkenness having overdosed on the Multicultural Kumbaya Kool-Aid?

What could possibly have motivated them to so debase Canadian citizenship?

And what of our politicians who after every Muslim atrocity sickeningly mouth the lie that “Islam is a religion of peace”.

Islam is not a religion, it is a murder cult.

Sharia law sanctions armed Jihad. Period.

Sharia law sanctions the murder of adulterers, apostates, and gays. Period.

Sharia law sanctions slavery. Period.

Sharia law sanctions wife beating. Period.

Sharia law sanctions child marriage. Period.

The only peace Islam understands is supremacist dominance meaning at best dhimmitude for Christians and Jews and worse for the rest of you. Period.

Who in their right mind could possibly have considered such a perverse belief system compatible with our own?

There is no “modern” Islam. There is no “western” Islam. There is only Islam, and it is a hateful creed.

This is an election year. Don’t ask your member of parliament for an explanation, demand it.

Demand to know who is behind our death-wish immigration policy.

Demand they end it.

God forbid the day comes, but it is almost inevitable a major Muslim terror attack will succeed in Canada.

I hope every martinet bureaucrat and every stuffed shirt politician responsible for our criminally negligent immigration policy is sued by the survivors and victims families.

I hope we can jail them.

Share
  • DMB

    Pretty much sums up multiculturalism and diversity.

    • Yes it does, a one way street.

      • winniec

        I agree. Superb article!
        26 Main Things Wrong with Islam:

        1 No Golden Rule 2 No free speech 3 No democracy 4 Jihad – holy war of supremacism 5 Honour killings 6 Taqiyya – sacred lying 7 Taqlid – group think 8 Misogyny – repression of women 9 Rape of kafirsas jihad prizes 10 Genocide 11 Ethnic cleansing 12 Al-Walaa wal-Baraa – Islamic apartheid 13 Torture 14 Plundering 15 Cruel and unusual punishments 16 Backwardness – stagnation 17 Violence against women 18 Slavery 19 Discriminatory Sharia law 20 Hatred of the arts 21 Pedophilia disguised as child marriage 22 Fifty generations of cousin marriage and genetic defects 23 Cruelty to animals 24 Extortion tax to humiliate disbelievers 25 No historic basis 26 Obscurantism

      • Great stuff. I posted it.

    • Was this article published elsewhere? It needs to be. It is spot on correct.

      • It’s only here since I wrote it;)

        • Nice job.

          I hope you get a lot of readers and links.

        • P_F

          Thanks, BCF.
          When I was reading through the article I was thinking who else but our own BCF could write this??

        • pdxnag

          It is the central question of this era.

  • dance…dancetotheradio

    So many periods I thought I was reading Stephane Dion.

  • Alain

    Very accurate and reasonable. This is exactly what should flood the mail box of every federal politician. We all deserve a straight answer.

    • I should make an attachment available for people to tweet or email to their politicians.

      • Alain

        Yes, an excellent idea.

      • Exile1981

        What about provincial ones? I’m going to the candidates meet and greet for my part of Alberta later this week.

      • cmh

        we can cut and paste. thanks for this.

      • Morticiaa

        If I have trouble copying it I will let u know

      • Justin St.Denis

        I was think precisely that. Your “screed” reads very much like a letter from a genuinely frustrated and aware citizen of Canada. It also DEMANDS an answer or two. Even if that answer does just constitute multiculti platitudes, at least one gets DOCUMENTED PROOF of the respondant’s hypocrisy/stupidity

    • Morticiaa

      So copy it and do just that, I am

  • opo

    What’s the point in owning a Canadian passport?

    • Terrorists love them.

    • Justin St.Denis

      They fetch a good price on eBay?

      They “work” really good when dealing with banks?

      Everybody really needs an official horrible “head shot”?

      Are any of my answers correct?

  • Ho Hum

    This is the most urgent issue facing Canada and it should be the number one campaign issue but I doubt very much that it will be debated. Oh I’m sure Trudeau will call Harper an “Islamophobe” for opposing the Niqab in citizenship ceremonies but Harper will respond by “proudly” pointing out that under his watch 300,000 Muslims came to Canada. He will “proudly” point to the fact that he is bringing 10,000’s more including refugees from Syria and Iraq. The problem is we do not have a nationalist party in Canada and unless we form one we are doomed.

    • The Star is reporting 67% of those surveyed agree with Harper.

  • Pontifex Maximus
  • Pontifex Maximus

    Jewish Involvement in Shaping American
    Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical
    Review
    Kevin MacDonald
    California State University-Long Beach
    This paper discusses Jewish involvement in shaping United States immigration policy. In addition to a periodic interest in fostering the immigration of co-religionists as a result of anti-Semitic movements, Jews have an interest in opposing the establishment of ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies in which they reside as minorities. Jews have been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at altering the ethnic status quo in the United States in favor of immigration of non-European peoples. These activities have involved leadership in Congress, organizing and funding anti-restrictionist groups composed of Jews and gentiles, and originating
    intellectual movements opposed to evolutionary and biological perspectives in the social sciences. http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Immigration.pdf

    • Frau Katze

      If you think it was only Jews, you’re crazy. The Christian churches are huge fans of mass immigration. Not to mention all the tree-hugger leftist crowd, and last but far from least, there’s the business class with their insatiable demand for cheap labour.

      Besides, not all Jews are in agreement. We routinely post their pieces on this site. Perhaps you didn’t know that people like Daniel Greenfield and Cherson & Molschsky are all Jews?

      • Pontifex Maximus

        They are the vanguard along with countless useful idiots most of whom are gentiles. There are smart Jews who are against immigration but alas the majority are rabid diversity-mongers

        • Justin St.Denis

          The majority? And you know this how? Please elucidate, because I am perceiving the faint stink of anti-Semitism here. You use a very broad brush, with no apparent regard for research.

          • Pontifex Maximus

            Jews Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform
            Ethics and Self-Interest Drive Unusual Nationwide Effort The American Jewish Committee leader is part of a nearly unprecedented push by Jewish groups for immigration reform

            I assume that the Jewish Daily Forward is not “antisemitic”!
            http://forward.com/articles/179296/jews-unite-behind-push-for-immigration-reform/?p=all#ixzz3Ufl6dvfP

          • Justin St.Denis

            LOL

            Not too bright, are you?

            Your equation boils down to this: I read an article in the Roman Catholic Times about social justice and how important the movement is. The majority of Catholics, therefore, endorse the social justice movement, including the LGBTQWERTY agenda.

            Not true.

            Example: A cow is female. Your mother is female. Your mother is a cow.

            Again here, not true.

            But you’re not that bright.

      • Pontifex Maximus

        “A congruent opinion is expressed by prominent Jewish social scientist and ethnic activist Earl Raab, who remarks very positively on the success of
        American immigration policy in altering the ethnic composition of the United States since 1965.1
        Raab notes that the Jewish community has taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of American immigration
        policy (1993a, 17), and he has also maintained that one factor inhibiting anti-Semitism in the contemporary United States is that “an increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop” (1995, 91). Or more colorfully:
        The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
        We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional
        constraints against bigotry more practical than ever. (Raab 1993b, 23)” http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7.pdf

      • Pontifex Maximus

        The “Christian” churches are led by utterly pathetic and thinly disguised quasi-Marxist buffoons; the corporate elites are internationalist and rootless traitors who deserve to decorate the lampposts!

        • Raymond Hietapakka

          …led by gelded ponies wearing horseblinders…

        • David Murrell

          Not all Christian churches. At my Baptist church, the pastor strongly criticizes Islam, citing its horrendous human rights abuses. That’s a good start.

          • Pontifex Maximus

            American Baptist Churchesleaves abortion policy to local churches and individuals. A resolution adopted in 1988, updated in 1994 and accepted as current policy, “acknowledges diversity of … convictions within our fellowship,” making no distinction between those who believe that human life begins at conception (with the consequence that abortion is immoral), and those who believe it can be morally acceptable based on “compassion and justice.” This relativism gives no protection to the unborn child, and little guidance to women and men who must live with the consequences of their choice. http://www.pregnantpause.org/people/wherchur.htm

        • mobuyus

          Decorating lampposts, wasn’t that the Nazi cure for treason heir maximus?

          • Doug Kursk

            Herr..;)

      • Judging by Pontifex Maximus’ many anti-Jewish posts on this page, he/she is an anti-Semite. There is no denying that many Jews have been involved in non-Aryan immigration efforts – but it is not qua Jews that they so behaved, but in truth moved by their leftist values. Most Jews are well aware of the dangers posed by Muslim immigration and would do nothing to encourage it but indeed everything to oppose it. Obviously, Pontifex Maximus is looking at the issue with a big dose of prejudice, trying to ‘blame the Jews’ for the global plague of Muslim invasion.

        • Pontifex Maximus

          American Jewish Committee
          From Wikipedia “Louis B. Marshall (1856–1929) was a key founder and long-time president (1912–29). He made the organization the leading voice in the 1920s against immigration restriction, but could not stop passage of legislation setting quotas on the inflow of immigrants.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jewish_Committee

          Gee whiz, I did not know that Wikipedia is “antisemitic”! http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=1545

        • Well said Avi. I will leave Pontiflex Maximus’s posts up as an example of addle brained anti-semitism as you have refuted him expertly.

        • Justin St.Denis

          Thank you for that. I was unaware of this commenter’s record of anti-Semitism. I was simply getting that “smell” from that single comment here. I really, really genuinely LOATHE anti-Semites/Anti-Semitism. Encountering it here was kind of surprising.

        • David Murrell

          I agree with you, Avi.

        • Pontifex Maximus

          You are prejudiced against the truth; research the topic seriously and you will know that I am right!

          • I looked at the wikipedia article you recommended, but saw nothing there to justify your conclusions. Your mental image of Jews plotting to bring non-Europeans to North America so as to turn the racially European population into a minority is simply a page out of the Elders of Zion. I assure you, Jews are not plotting anything against their neighbors. Wake up. If anyone is plotting anything nefarious it is the Moslems – and I believe that because they themselves say it, and not out of some dark fantasy.

    • Raymond Hietapakka

      Izzat why they wouldn’t let Joooos into N.America during the 1930’s? The Joooos didn’t like any more Joooos coming in?

  • Pontifex Maximus

    Organized Jewry and their
    Shabbos goys are the foremost culprits in promoting the invasion of the West! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series#Understanding_Jewish_Influence_.282004.29

  • Pontifex Maximus

    The End of White People Interview with Dr. MacDonald https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgDY9yDi90o

    • Morticiaa

      Yes the premise is inevidable, whites will disappear sadly, and some of his observations interesting,
      But to make his points he places Jews and whites in two different camps
      And this is just silly…most Jews are white…he neeeds to compare religious based cultures….
      And yes, intellectually there are cultural/religious based factors that lead to superior results in Jewish genes… Adaptations through environmental factors
      Generations creating higher gene pools….and of course the converse is true

  • Pontifex Maximus

    Red Ice Radio – Kevin MacDonald – The Dispossession of Europeans & Pathological Altruism
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4goBcZY2Eo

  • Pontifex Maximus
  • Pontifex Maximus

    Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Lerner_Spectre

  • Morticiaa

    Yes excellent piece
    I am going to copy and send it to Stephen Harper, Jason kenney, and all other ministers, as facts and concerns written by you, but also felt by me
    Is that ok with u?

    • Morticiaa

      This above comment was left in relation to your main blog, not the video comment from pontifex

  • Pontifex Maximus

    To the members of the
    Privy council: just keep it up!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mkp8ZdQ9SqI

  • To tolerate Islam is national suicide. Any government or administrative body or individual who promotes or simply does not oppose Muslim immigration or diversity is killing the country it is supposed to be defending and serving.

  • Brett_McS

    Brilliant harangue!

  • Raymond Hietapakka

    Why? Pourqoui? 3 Simple Words. Lawyers, Lawyers, and more Lawyers…(sorry, that was 4).

  • ericdondero

    Obama’s importing Somalis, Nigerians, Ethiopians in record numbers here in the United States. They make reliable Democrat voters. 100% of them vote Democrat. And the Dems ensure that they’re all bused to the polling places or get absentee ballots.

  • ericdondero

    The way Obama and the Democrats figure it, if you can kill off the native white population who is individualistic, self-reliant, distrusting of government, you can institute the socialist utopia much faster. So, Obama and the Dems are pushing policies to promote faster white genocide.

  • irishrus

    Truth begins and ends with feelings and denial with lefties.

  • Mickey Oberman

    WHY? indeed!

  • chayisun

    Citizenship and immigration…..Just wonder how many employees within that section are muslims? Would be interesting to see.

    • I bet many.

    • P_F

      Actually quite a lot.
      A majority of Citizenship & Immigration department workforce constitutes new immigrants.

  • Canadian woman

    Who wrote this right on statement?

  • cmh

    Please consider giving this article its own Facebook page. It is already quoted on an existing page but should star on its own page. Please.

    • I do not use FB – they kicked me out because they said I was a cat.

      I’m not kidding.

  • Pontifex Maximus

    From Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique:

    Jewish Chronicle, the principle Jewish newspaper in England, opposed restriction on Commonwealth immigration in an editorial in the October 20, 1961 edition (p. 20). The editorial noted that Jews perceived the 1905 legislation as directed against them and stated, “all restrictions on immigration are in principle retrogressive steps, particularly for this country, and a disappointment to those throughout the world who would like to see the limitations on the freedom of movement reduced rather than increased. The issue is one of moral principle.”

    During the 1970s the Conservative Party opposed immigration into Britain because, in the words of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Britain was in danger of being “swamped” by peoples who lacked “fundamental British characteristics” (Alderman 1983, 148). Conservative politicians attempted to obtain Jewish support on this issue, but the anti-immigration policy was condemned by official Jewish organizations, including the Board of Deputies, on the basis that “Since all British Jews are, or are descended from, immigrant, it was unethical—even immoral, for a Jew to support immigration control, or at least tighter immigration control” (Alderman 1983, 148-149). (In its editorial of February 24, 1978 [p. 22] the Jewish Chronicle supported a non-restrictionist immigration policy, but was careful to avoid framing the issue as a Jewish issue, presumably because a Conservative Jewish Minister of Parliament, Keith Joseph, had appealed to Jews as Jews to support restriction. The Chronicle was most concerned to deny the existence of a Jewish vote.) Jews who did support the government policy did so out of fear that increased immigration would lead to a fascist backlash and therefore increased anti-Semitism.

    In the case of Canada, Abella (1990, 234-235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).

    • Pontifex you equate Judaism with leftism. That some idiot leftists happen also to be Jewish is coincidence. There are useful idiot leftists of every creed and colour who advocate for unfettered immigration etc.

      • Pontifex Maximus

        Jews are highly over-represented among the left; Bernie Farber is a poignant exemple. The Upper West Side Jewish elite is pathologically liberal and they are extremely influential; Elena Kagan is a quasi-parodic exemple. Yes, there are many factions within organized Jewry but it appears as if nearly all of them are uber-liberal, especially when it comes to immigration policy, and we must also honestly acknowledge that some of these organizations are indeed master at the art of lobbying the US polity; the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations is a perfect exemple: “For its first 30 years, the organization was headed by Yehuda Hellman. After his death in 1986,Malcolm Hoenlein became chairman. Hoenlein took a much stronger role in shaping U.S. policy, especially within the executive branch

        The Presidents’ Conference and AIPAC work together, with all members of the conference sitting on AIPAC’s executive committee, which is distinct from its board of directors. The two organizations follow a clear division of labor. The conference focuses on the executive branch of the U.S. government, while AIPAC lobbies in Congress.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_of_Presidents_of_Major_American_Jewish_Organizations

    • PM – one thing you need to take into consideration is the historical context, which varies. Before the Second WW and for some while after it, the Jews rightly felt as the target of anti-immigration proposals, so that they naturally opposed them. Of course, such proposals as of the late Sixties were directed at immigration from ex-colonies. I remember in the late 1960s attending a conference by Enoch Powell in the British House of Parliament, as an enthusiastic teenage student fan. He was concerned with the demise of Western civilization already then due to unbridled immigration. This immigration had nothing to do with Jews, but with the breakup of the British Empire. The last few decades have shown the disastrous effects of these leftist immigration policies all over the Western world. But this would not be the deadly danger it is today, were it not for the Muslim revival and world domination ambitions. This is an even newer situation, and the crux of the matter facing us today. To repeat, this has nothing to do with Jewish plots as you seem to imagine. You have to focus on reality and not let yourself be led astray by your silly fantasies.

  • pdxnag

    It is shocking to see a pregnant 17 year old Somali girl (with seditious Islamic garb) with 2 tiny tots in tow at the local grocery store. Welfare and food stamps and free housing accelerate the displacement policy.

  • Richard1ne

    Stop Muslim immigration and implement Geert Wilders’ plan.

  • Blue Hour

    I have written my elected officials and asked why they are importing misogyny in the form of Islam. They always reply with a generic “nation of immigrants” response and refuse to address the question. We revolted against the British for less. It is time for another revolution. This is not democracy.